IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on risk contagion mechanism of big fintech based on the SIRS model

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Li
  • Zhongming Tan
  • Chenyu Huang

Abstract

In recent years, while the relationship between the new financial institutions, represented by financial technology companies, and the traditional financial institutions(banks, securities, insurance, etc.) has been steadily enhanced, a New Relational Network has silently emerged. Along with the rapid expansion of big fintech companies, the possibility of financial risk breeding and spreading in the New Relational Network is also rising. This article analyzes and simulates the risk contagion mechanism of big fintech risks based on the SIRS epidemic model. The study’s findings imply that: when the number of big fintech companies infected with risk exceeds the risk threshold, the big fintech risk will spread in the New Relational Network. At this time, the number of big fintech companies infected with risk can be reduced below the threshold by enhancing the risk warning, risk management, risk buffering and blocking capabilities, and timely improving risk prevention and control measures in the post-infection phase. It means that the big fintech risk is controlled. For big fintech risks, proactive interventions are more effective than post-incident response measures. This paper makes the following recommendations for preventing big fintech risks: creating a risk monitoring and early warning system to raise the Big Fintech companies’ direct immunization rates; strengthening the big fintech companies’ risk management and risk mitigation capabilities; enhancing the internal and external supervision to achieve sustainable development of big fintech companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Li & Zhongming Tan & Chenyu Huang, 2023. "Research on risk contagion mechanism of big fintech based on the SIRS model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291230
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291230&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen, Shigang & Li, Jianping & Huang, Chuangxia & Zhu, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Extreme risk spillovers among traditional financial and FinTech institutions: A complex network perspective," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 190-202.
    2. Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Yi Huang & Hyun Song Shin & Pablo Zbinden, 2019. "BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(100), pages 761-799.
    3. Rainer Alt & Roman Beck & Martin T. Smits, 2018. "FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 235-243, August.
    4. Chaudhry, Sajid M. & Ahmed, Rizwan & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc & Benjasak, Chonlakan, 2022. "Tail risk and systemic risk of finance and technology (FinTech) firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Preziuso & Franziska Koefer & Michel Ehrenhard, 2023. "Open banking and inclusive finance in the European Union: perspectives from the Dutch stakeholder ecosystem," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Chen, Ning & Li, Shaofang & Lu, Shuai, 2023. "The extreme risk connectedness of the global financial system: G7 and BRICS evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Preziuso, Massimo & Koefer, Franziska & Ehrenhard, Michel, 2023. "Open banking and inclusive finance in the European Union: Perspectives from the Dutch stakeholder ecosystem," EIF Working Paper Series 2023/94, European Investment Fund (EIF).
    4. Drago, Carlo & Minnetti, Francesco & Di Nallo, Loris & Manzari, Alberto, 2025. "Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    5. Vuković, Darko B. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Kwakye, Bernard & Febtinugraini, Armike & Shakib, Mohammed, 2024. "Does fintech matter for financial inclusion and financial stability in BRICS markets?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Polasik, Michał & Huterska, Agnieszka & Iftikhar, Rehan & Mikula, Štěpán, 2020. "The impact of Payment Services Directive 2 on the PayTech sector development in Europe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 385-401.
    7. Zhang, Feng & Liu, Zhiyou & Feng, Fangfang & Li, Junjun, 2024. "Can FinTech promote enterprises’ ambidextrous innovation capability? Organizational resilience perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Jorge Padilla, 2020. "Big Tech “banks”, financial stability and regulation," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    9. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    10. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    11. Tang, Yunfeng & Zhang, Xuan & Lu, Shibao & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "Digital finance and air pollution in China: Evolution characteristics, impact mechanism and regional differences," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    12. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    13. Berger, Allen N. & Boot, Arnoud W.A., 2024. "Financial intermediation services and competition analyses: Review and paths forward for improvement," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Sun, Xiaoyan & Xie, Xuanli, 2024. "How does digital finance promote entrepreneurship? The roles of traditional financial institutions and BigTech firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Nourallah, Mustafa & Öhman, Peter & Hamati, Samer, 2024. "Financial technology and financial capability: Study of the European Union," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. repec:zbw:bofitp:2021_014 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Chaklader, Barnali & Gupta, Brij B. & Panigrahi, Prabin Kumar, 2023. "Analyzing the progress of FINTECH-companies and their integration with new technologies for innovation and entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. van der Cruijsen, Carin & de Haan, Jakob & Jonker, Nicole, 2022. "Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected public trust? Evidence for the US and the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1010-1024.
    19. Stefan Vachkov & Nedyalko Valkanov, 2021. "Regulation, Competition and Partnership in the Financial Sector," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 3, pages 259-276.
    20. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    21. Fred Huibers, 2021. "Regulatory Response to the Rise of Fintech Credit in The Netherlands," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.