IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dose blockchain-based agri-food supply chain guarantee the initial information authenticity? An evolutionary game perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Weixia Yang
  • Congli Xie
  • Lindong Ma

Abstract

Guarantee the initial information of the agri-food supply chain (AFSC) authenticity based on the blockchain is a complex problem. This paper develops an evolutionary game model of AFSC participants based on the blockchain and discusses the impacts of the key parameters on the dynamic evolution process of participants. To verify the theoretical results, simulation experiments and sensitivity analysis were conducted through Matlab 2022b. The study results show that: (1) Guaranteeing the initial information authenticity could become the common belief of all AFSC participants, with the scientific design of parameters; (2) Higher reward and synergistic effect, lower information cost and risk contribute to improving the probability of initial true information sharing. (3) when the default penalty is too severe, the enterprise will evolve into not sharing the initial true information. Finally, this study could provide some suggestions and countermeasures for the leading enterprise in the agricultural supply chain and local governments to guarantee initial information authenticity in China. That is the way to realize the sustainability of AFSC in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixia Yang & Congli Xie & Lindong Ma, 2023. "Dose blockchain-based agri-food supply chain guarantee the initial information authenticity? An evolutionary game perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286886
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286886
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286886&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jun & Qin, Yanjun & Zhou, Jingyang, 2021. "Incentive policies for prefabrication implementation of real estate enterprises: An evolutionary game theory-based analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Mohammed Alkahtani & Qazi Salman Khalid & Muhammad Jalees & Muhammad Omair & Ghulam Hussain & Catalin Iulian Pruncu, 2021. "E-Agricultural Supply Chain Management Coupled with Blockchain Effect and Cooperative Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Bo Yan & Jing Fan & Congyan Cai & Jing Fang, 2020. "Supply chain coordination of fresh Agri-products based on value loss," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 185-196, December.
    4. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    5. Bo Yan & Xinni Wang & Ping Shi, 2017. "Risk assessment and control of agricultural supply chains under Internet of Things," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 56(01), March.
    6. Shengzhong Zhang & Yingmin Yu & Qihong Zhu & Chun Martin Qiu & Aixuan Tian, 2020. "Green Innovation Mode under Carbon Tax and Innovation Subsidy: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Portfolio Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Horst Treiblmaier, 2019. "Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Feixiao Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Quality of Agricultural Products in Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Wang, Changfeng & Hu, Qiying, 2020. "Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    10. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Arim Park & Huan Li, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Bo Yan & Xinni Wang & Ping Shi, 2017. "Risk assessment and control of agricultural supply chains under Internet of Things," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Tönnissen, Stefan & Teuteberg, Frank, 2020. "Analysing the impact of blockchain-technology for operations and supply chain management: An explanatory model drawn from multiple case studies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    16. Ali, Jabir & Kumar, Sushil, 2011. "Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and farmers’ decision-making across the agricultural supply chain," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 149-159.
    17. Ge, Houtian & Gray, Richard & Nolan, James, 2015. "Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: A comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 208-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Uncovering dimensions of the impact of blockchain technology in supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    2. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Oguntegbe, Kunle Francis & Di Paola, Nadia & Vona, Roberto, 2022. "Behavioural antecedents to blockchain implementation in agrifood supply chain management: A thematic analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Qizheng He & Yong Sun & Maoan Yi, 2023. "Evolutionary Game of Pesticide Reduction Management for Sustainable Agriculture: An Analysis Based on Local Governments, Farmers, and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Weili Yin & Wenxue Ran, 2021. "Theoretical Exploration of Supply Chain Viability Utilizing Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2024. "A Multi-objective integrated approach to address sustainability in a meat supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Qianqian Gu & Lei Hang, 2022. "A Game Analysis-Based Behavioral Interaction Framework between Governments and Innovative Enterprises for Intellectual Property Regulation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Arunmozhi, Manimuthu & Venkatesh, V.G. & Arisian, Sobhan & Shi, Yangyan & Raja Sreedharan, V., 2022. "Application of blockchain and smart contracts in autonomous vehicle supply chains: An experimental design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Kumar, Shashank & Raut, Rakesh D. & Agrawal, Nishant & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Sharma, Mahak & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Integrated blockchain and internet of things in the food supply chain: Adoption barriers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Shiqi Xu & Wenjun Yin & Xingwei Li & Weihong Chen & Beiyu Yi & Yongquan Wang, 2023. "Evolutionary mechanism of green technology innovation behavior in the operation period of construction and demolition waste recycling public–private partnership projects," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4637-4650, December.
    12. Benini, Mario & Detti, Paolo & Nerozzi, Luca, 2025. "Optimization models and algorithms for sustainable crop planning and rotation: An arc flow formulation and a column generation approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Rizwan Manzoor & B. S. Sahay & Sujeet Kumar Singh, 2025. "Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an organizational theoretic overview and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1307-1354, May.
    14. Anqi Zhu & Bei Bian & Yiping Jiang & Jiaxiang Hu, 2020. "Integrated Tomato Picking and Distribution Scheduling Based on Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Chen, Xun-Qi & Lei, Yu-Tian & Wang, Yi-Ran, 2023. "Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Ji, Guojun & Zhou, Shu & Lai, Kee-Hung & Tan, Kim Hua & Kumar, Ajay, 2022. "Timing of blockchain adoption in a supply chain with competing manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    17. Sara Rye, 2022. "Analysis of the Disparity between Recurring and Temporary Collaborative Performance: A Literature Review between 1994 and 2021," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Leng Yi & Fukuda Hiroatsu, 2022. "Incentives for Innovation in Robotics and Automated Construction: Based on a Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Qiezeng Yuan, 2021. "How to Restrain Regulatory Capture and Promote Green Innovation in China. An Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Heng Chen & Jennifer K. Ryan, 2023. "Optimal specialty crop planning policies with yield learning and forward contract," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 359-378, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.