IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of rhetorical devices on audience responses with online videos: An augmented elaboration likelihood model

Author

Listed:
  • Guangchao Charles Feng
  • Yiwen Luo
  • Zhenwei Yu
  • Jinlang Wen

Abstract

The way in which information is linguistically presented can impact audience attention, emotion, and cognitive responses, even if the content remains unchanged. The present study aims to examine the effects of rhetorical devices on audience responses by introducing a new theoretical framework, the augmented elaboration likelihood model (A-ELM), which integrates elements of the Elaboration Likelihood Model and narrative theory. The results show that the mediation effects of attention on the relationships between rhetorical devices and affective and cognitive elaborations are moderated by involvement. Nonnarrative evidence, combined narrative and numerical evidence, source credibility, and tropes versus the lack of figures of speech, elicit better audience responses in low-involvement situations, whereas numerical evidence outperforms narratives in high-involvement situations. This study not only offers a novel theoretical framework in the form of A-ELM, but also has important implications for advancing methodologies and practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangchao Charles Feng & Yiwen Luo & Zhenwei Yu & Jinlang Wen, 2023. "Effects of rhetorical devices on audience responses with online videos: An augmented elaboration likelihood model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282663
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282663
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282663&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    2. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1996. "Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 424-438, March.
    3. Swasy, John L & Munch, James M, 1985. "Examining the Target of Receiver Elaborations: Rhetorical Question Effects on," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 877-886, March.
    4. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 2003. "Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures under Directed Processing versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 579-587, March.
    5. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1999. "Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 37-54, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carnevale, Marina & Luna, David & Lerman, Dawn, 2017. "Brand linguistics: A theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 572-591.
    2. Albinsson, Pia A. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Burman, Bidisha, 2025. "How allusion enhances consumer response to hope appeals in health messaging," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Gavin L. Fox & Stephen J. Lind, 2020. "A framework for viral marketing replication and mutation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 206-222, December.
    4. Boujena, Othman & Ulrich, Isabelle & Piris, Yolande & Chicheportiche, Laëtitia, 2021. "Using food pictorial metaphor in the advertising of non-food brands: An exploratory investigation of consumer interpretation and affective response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Dass, Mayukh & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Kumar, Piyush & Thomas, Sunil, 2014. "A study of the antecedents of slogan liking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2504-2511.
    6. Joy, Annamma & Sherry Jr., John F. & Deschenes, Jonathan, 2009. "Conceptual blending in advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.
    7. Shuo Cao & Huili Wang & Xiaoxia Zou, 2020. "The Effect of Visual Structure of Pictorial Metaphors on Advertisement Attitudes," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-60, March.
    8. Eliza K. Dehay & Jan R. Landwehr, 2019. "A MAP for effective advertising: the metaphoric advertising processing model," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 289-303, December.
    9. Huang, Xiaozhi & Wei, Meiting & Cao, Xin, 2024. "Visual metaphors and white space: How the visual rhetorical language in advertising influences consumer responses to paradox brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Aner Tal & Yaniv Gvili & Moty Amar, 2021. "Visual Size Matters: The Effect of Product Depiction Size on Calorie Estimates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Wu, Laurie & Shen, Han & Fan, Alei & Mattila, Anna S., 2017. "The impact of language style on consumers′ reactions to online reviews," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 590-596.
    12. Bertele, Kerrie & Feiereisen, Stephanie & Storey, Chris & van Laer, Tom, 2020. "It’s not what you say, it’s the way you say it! Effective message styles for promoting innovative new services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-49.
    13. Michael Thomas, 2019. "Was Television Responsible for a New Generation of Smokers?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 689-707.
    14. Varsha Jain & Subhadip Roy & Adwita Pant, 2013. "Effect of colour and relative product size (RPS) on consumer attitudes," Transnational Marketing Journal, Oxbridge Publishing House, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 41-58, October.
    15. Kohli, Chiranjeev & Leuthesser, Lance & Suri, Rajneesh, 2007. "Got slogan? Guidelines for creating effective slogans," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 415-422.
    16. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
    17. Davison, Jane, 2014. "Visual rhetoric and the case of intellectual capital," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 20-37.
    18. Stallen, Mirre & Smidts, Ale & Rijpkema, Mark & Smit, Gitty & Klucharev, Vasily & Fernández, Guillén, 2010. "Celebrities and shoes on the female brain: The neural correlates of product evaluation in the context of fame," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 802-811, October.
    19. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    20. Jakina Debnam, 2017. "Selection Effects and Heterogeneous Demand Responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax Vote," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1172-1187.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.