IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269314.html

Digital economy, technological progress, and city export trade

Author

Listed:
  • Linlin Zhang
  • An Pan
  • Shuangshuang Feng
  • Yaoyao Qin

Abstract

The development of the digital economy is conducive to the innovative development of foreign trade and the formation of a “dual circulation” development pattern in China. Based on the panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities in China from 2005 to 2019, this paper examines the influence of the digital economy on urban export trade and its heterogeneity. And we use a mediating effect model to explore the possible mediating role of technological progress in the above influences. The results find that: (1) The improvement of the digital economy can promote cities export; (2) The promotion of the digital economy to the growth of city export scale is heterogeneous, which is more significant in the western and northeastern cities with relatively remote geographical locations, and the third-tier and lower cities with relatively backward economic development. (3) Technological progress has played a significant role in promoting the growth of export for the digital economy. Thus, it’s of great importance for China to increase investment in digital economy infrastructure and pay more attention to the differences in diverse city development processes. It should also support basic research and development in information technology to promote high-quality development of China’s foreign trade through the digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Linlin Zhang & An Pan & Shuangshuang Feng & Yaoyao Qin, 2022. "Digital economy, technological progress, and city export trade," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269314
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269314&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sufang Zheng & Rabnawaz Khan, 2021. "Performance evaluation of e-commerce firms in China: Using three-stage data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Masahisa Fujita & Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561476, December.
    3. Clarke, George R.G., 2008. "Has the internet increased exports for firms from low and middle-income countries," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 16-37, March.
    4. Nakatani, Ryota, 2021. "Total factor productivity enablers in the ICT industry: A cross-country firm-level analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    5. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    6. Abeliansky, Ana L. & Hilbert, Martin, 2017. "Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 35-48.
    7. Eva Hagsten & Patricia Kotnik, 2017. "ICT as facilitator of internationalisation in small- and medium-sized firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 431-446, February.
    8. Marc J. Melitz & Giancarlo I. P. Ottaviano, 2021. "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Firms and Workers in a Globalized World Larger Markets, Tougher Competition, chapter 4, pages 87-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Andreas Lendle & Marcelo Olarreaga & Simon Schropp & Pierre‐Louis Vézina, 2016. "There Goes Gravity: eBay and the Death of Distance," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(591), pages 406-441, March.
    10. Robert M X Wu & Zhongwu Zhang & Wanjun Yan & Jianfeng Fan & Jinwen Gou & Bao Liu & Ergun Gide & Jeffrey Soar & Bo Shen & Syed Fazal-e-Hasan & Zengquan Liu & Peng Zhang & Peilin Wang & Xinxin Cui & Zha, 2022. "A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Marc J. Melitz & Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, 2008. "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity (DOI:10.111/j.1467-937x.2007.00463.x)," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 985-985.
    12. Andrew B. Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2007. "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(1), pages 31-66.
    13. David Audretsch & Diana Heger & Tobias Veith, 2015. "Infrastructure and entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 219-230, February.
    14. Ganguly, Shrimoyee & Acharyya, Rajat, 2021. "Deficit versus balanced budget financing of ICT Infrastructure and Export Quality," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haisheng Hu, 2025. "Analysis of the impact mechanism of the China-EU geographical indications agreement policy on agricultural product Exports," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(3), pages 891-913, September.
    2. Voxi Heinrich Amavilah & Antonio Rodriguez Andres, 2023. "Technological knowledge progress: Were famous laws almost correct in developing and emerging economies?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Zhibo Yang & Liyou Fu & Yirong Chen, 2023. "Digital economy and pollution reduction–Mechanism and regional heterogeneity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Chang Qing Lin & Wen Xin Huang, 2026. "Export Product Quality and Export Volume Growth: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 16(1), pages 21582440251, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongjin Wang & Wenbin Wang, 2025. "Trade Theories in the Digital Age," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(2), pages 1-40, March.
    2. Zhang, Yuan & Li, Huanjie, 2025. "Cross-border E-commerce and energy efficiency: Evidence from China's cross-border E-commerce pilot zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Michele Imbruno & Joël Cariolle & Jaime de Melo, 2025. "Digital connectivity and firm participation in foreign markets: An exporter-based bilateral analysis," Post-Print hal-05570207, HAL.
    4. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm & Iyer, Harish, 2018. "Does bridging the Internet Access Divide contribute to enhancing countries' integration into the global trade in services markets?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 61-77.
    5. Guzmán Ourens, 2020. "The long-term impact of trade with firm heterogeneity," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(4), pages 887-919, November.
    6. Gan, Li & Hernandez, Manuel A. & Ma, Shuang, 2016. "The higher costs of doing business in China: Minimum wages and firms' export behavior," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 81-94.
    7. Fulvio Castellacci, 2014. "Service Firms Heterogeneity, International Collaborations and Export Participation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 259-285, June.
    8. Jürgen Meckl & Benjamin Weigert, 2013. "Special Issue. Guest Editor: Zhihao Yu," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 549-558, August.
    9. Albert Guangzhou Hu & Zhengning Liu, 2014. "Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 488-512, August.
    10. Kichko, Sergei & Ozhegova, Alina & Tarasov, Alexander, 2025. "Quality distortions in monopolistic competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Fatou Cissé & Ji Eun Choi, 2015. "Do firms learn by exporting or learn to export? Evidence from Senegalese manufacturing plant," WIDER Working Paper Series 057, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Imbruno, Michele & Ketterer, Tobias D., 2018. "Energy efficiency gains from importing intermediate inputs: Firm-level evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 117-141.
    13. Anders Akerman & Edwin Leuven & Magne Mogstad, 2022. "Information Frictions, Internet, and the Relationship between Distance and Trade," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 133-163, January.
    14. Pengfei Wang & Danyang Xie, 2018. "Trade, Sectorial Reallocation, and Growth," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 19(1), pages 49-74, May.
    15. Alcalá, Francisco, 2016. "Specialization across goods and export quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 216-232.
    16. Carlo Perroni & Davide Suverato, 2023. "Skills scarcity and export intensity," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 719-757, May.
    17. Pang, Suqin & Li, Zhaohua & Wang, Yong, 2024. "Digital technology and domestic value-added ratio in export: Evidence from China's pilot zones for integrating informatization and industrialization," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 424-439.
    18. Mallick, Sushanta & Marques, Helena, 2016. "Pricing strategy of emerging market exporters in alternate currency regimes: The role of comparative advantage," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 68-81.
    19. Ehsan U. Choudhri & Antonio Marasco, 2017. "Is Foreign Technological Advance Harmful in the Melitz Model?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 149-166, February.
    20. Bekkers, Eddy & Stehrer, Robert, 2015. "Reallocation effects in the specific factors and Heckscher–Ohlin models under firm heterogeneity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 104-119.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.