IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting death and lost to follow-up among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: Derivation and external validation of a risk score in Haiti

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret L McNairy
  • Deanna Jannat-Khah
  • Jean W Pape
  • Adias Marcelin
  • Patrice Joseph
  • Jean Edward Mathon
  • Serena Koenig
  • Martin Wells
  • Daniel W Fitzgerald
  • Arthur Evans

Abstract

Background: Over 18 million adults have initiated life-saving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-poor settings; however, mortality and lost-to-follow-up rates continue to be high among patients in their first year after treatment start. Clinical decision tools are needed to identify patients at high risk for poor outcomes in order to provide individualized risk assessment and intervention. This study aimed to develop and externally validate risk prediction tools that estimate the probability of dying or of being lost to follow-up (LTF) during the year after starting ART. Methods: We used a derivation cohort of 7,031 adults age 15–70 years initiating ART from 2007 to 2013 at 6 clinics in Haiti; 242 (3.5%) had documented death and 1,521 (21.6%) were LTF at 1 year after starting ART. The following routinely collected data were used as predictors in two logistic regression models (one to predict death and another to predict LTF): age, gender, weight, CD4 count, WHO Stage, and diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). The validation cohort consisted of 1,835 adults initiating ART at a different HIV clinic in Haiti during 2012. We assessed model discrimination by measuring the C-statistic, and measured model calibration by how closely the predicted probabilities approximated actual probabilities of the two outcomes. We derived a nomogram and a point-based risk score from the predictive models. Findings: The model predicting death within the year after starting ART had a C-statistic of 0.75 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.81). There was no evidence for significant overfitting and the predictions were well calibrated. The strongest predictors of 1-year mortality were male gender, low weight, low CD4 count, advanced WHO stage, and the absence of TB. In the validation cohort, the C-statistic was 0.69 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.77). A point-based risk score for death had a C-statistic 0.73 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.76) and categorizes patients as low risk (

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret L McNairy & Deanna Jannat-Khah & Jean W Pape & Adias Marcelin & Patrice Joseph & Jean Edward Mathon & Serena Koenig & Martin Wells & Daniel W Fitzgerald & Arthur Evans, 2018. "Predicting death and lost to follow-up among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: Derivation and external validation of a risk score in Haiti," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201945
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201945&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horton, Nicholas J. & Kleinman, Ken P., 2007. "Much Ado About Nothing: A Comparison of Missing Data Methods and Software to Fit Incomplete Data Regression Models," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 79-90, February.
    2. Margaret L McNairy & Elaine J Abrams & Miriam Rabkin & Wafaa M El-Sadr, 2017. "Clinical decision tools are needed to identify HIV-positive patients at high risk for poor outcomes after initiation of antiretroviral therapy," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-6, April.
    3. Nancy Puttkammer & Steven Zeliadt & Jean Gabriel Balan & Janet Baseman & Rodney Destiné & Jean Wysler Domerçant & Garilus France & Nathaelf Hyppolite & Valérie Pelletier & Nernst Atwood Raphael & Kenn, 2014. "Development of an Electronic Medical Record Based Alert for Risk of HIV Treatment Failure in a Low-Resource Setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McDonough, Ian K. & Millimet, Daniel L., 2017. "Missing data, imputation, and endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 141-155.
    2. Zhong, Hua & Hu, Wuyang, 2015. "Farmers’ Willingness to Engage in Best Management Practices: an Application of Multiple Imputation," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196962, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Cain Polidano & Ha Vu, 2012. "Labour market impacts from disability onset," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2012-583, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    4. David (David Patrick) Madden, 2012. "The relationship between low birthweight and socioeconomic status in Ireland," Working Papers 201214, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    5. Valentino Dardanoni & Giuseppe De Luca & Salvatore Modica & Franco Peracchi, 2012. "A generalized missing-indicator approach to regression with imputed covariates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 12(4), pages 575-604, December.
    6. Trimborn, Simon & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2018. "CRIX an Index for cryptocurrencies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 107-122.
    7. Kristian Kleinke & Mark Stemmler & Jost Reinecke & Friedrich Lösel, 2011. "Efficient ways to impute incomplete panel data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 351-373, December.
    8. Brady T. West & Patricia Berglund & Steven G. Heeringa, 2008. "A closer examination of subpopulation analysis of complex-sample survey data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 8(4), pages 520-531, December.
    9. Dardanoni, Valentino & Modica, Salvatore & Peracchi, Franco, 2011. "Regression with imputed covariates: A generalized missing-indicator approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 362-368, June.
    10. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Trimborn, Simon, 2015. "CRIX or evaluating blockchain based currencies," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-048, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    11. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2016-021 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Labohm, Katharina & Baaken, Dominik & Hess, Sebastian, 2021. "Mikromarktstrukturen der Rohmilchautomaten in Deutschland," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317053, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    13. Fulvio Castellacci & José Miguel Natera, 2011. "A new panel dataset for cross-country analyses of national systems, growth and development (CANA)," Working Papers del Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales 1105, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales.
    14. Rachel Griffith & Rodrigo Lluberas & Melanie Lührmann, 2016. "Gluttony And Sloth? Calories, Labor Market Activity And The Rise Of Obesity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(6), pages 1253-1286, December.
    15. Göran Kauermann & Mehboob Ali, 2021. "Semi-parametric regression when some (expensive) covariates are missing by design," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1675-1696, August.
    16. Celeste Combrinck & Vanessa Scherman & David Maree & Sarah Howie, 2018. "Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(1), pages 21582440187, February.
    17. Hapfelmeier, A. & Ulm, K., 2014. "Variable selection by Random Forests using data with missing values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 129-139.
    18. Werber Borut & Baggia Alenka & Žnidaršič Anja, 2018. "Factors Affecting the Intentions to Use RFID Subcutaneous Microchip Implants for Healthcare Purposes," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(2), pages 121-133, May.
    19. Adriano Zanin Zambom & Gregory J. Matthews, 2021. "Sure independence screening in the presence of missing data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 817-845, April.
    20. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2021. "Matrix Completion, Counterfactuals, and Factor Analysis of Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1746-1763, October.
    21. Audronė Telešienė & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Daphne Goldman & Ralph Hansmann, 2021. "Evaluating an Educational Intervention Designed to Foster Environmental Citizenship among Undergraduate University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.