IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i10p2284-2295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Order selection tests with multiply imputed data

Author

Listed:
  • Consentino, Fabrizio
  • Claeskens, Gerda

Abstract

Nonparametric tests for the null hypothesis that a function has a prescribed form are developed and applied to data sets with missing observations. Omnibus nonparametric tests such as the order selection tests, do not need to specify a particular alternative parametric form, and have power against a large range of alternatives. More specifically, likelihood-based order selection tests are defined that can be used for multiply imputed data when the data are missing-at-random. A simulation study and data analysis illustrate the performance of the tests. In addition, an Akaike information criterion for model selection is presented that can be used with multiply imputed datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Consentino, Fabrizio & Claeskens, Gerda, 2010. "Order selection tests with multiply imputed data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 2284-2295, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:10:p:2284-2295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00154-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horton, Nicholas J. & Kleinman, Ken P., 2007. "Much Ado About Nothing: A Comparison of Missing Data Methods and Software to Fit Incomplete Data Regression Models," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 79-90, February.
    2. Jerome P. Reiter, 2007. "Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(2), pages 502-508.
    3. Gerda Claeskens & Nils Lid Hjort, 2004. "Goodness of Fit via Non‐parametric Likelihood Ratios," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(4), pages 487-513, December.
    4. Xiaowei Yang & Thomas R. Belin & W. John Boscardin, 2005. "Imputation and Variable Selection in Linear Regression Models with Missing Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 498-506, June.
    5. Nicolai Bissantz & Gerda Claeskens & Hajo Holzmann & Axel Munk, 2009. "Testing for lack of fit in inverse regression—with applications to biophotonic imaging," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 25-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Grund & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2016. "Multiple Imputation of Multilevel Missing Data," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, October.
    2. Lee, Min Cherng & Mitra, Robin, 2016. "Multiply imputing missing values in data sets with mixed measurement scales using a sequence of generalised linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 24-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriano Zanin Zambom & Gregory J. Matthews, 2021. "Sure independence screening in the presence of missing data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 817-845, April.
    2. Joost R. Ginkel, 2020. "Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for $${R}^{{2}}$$R2 in Multiply Imputed Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 185-205, March.
    3. McDonough, Ian K. & Millimet, Daniel L., 2017. "Missing data, imputation, and endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 141-155.
    4. Yajuan Si & Jerome P. Reiter, 2013. "Nonparametric Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Categorical Variables in Large-Scale Assessment Surveys," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(5), pages 499-521, October.
    5. Zhong, Hua & Hu, Wuyang, 2015. "Farmers’ Willingness to Engage in Best Management Practices: an Application of Multiple Imputation," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196962, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Cain Polidano & Ha Vu, 2012. "Labour market impacts from disability onset," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2012-583, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    7. David (David Patrick) Madden, 2012. "The relationship between low birthweight and socioeconomic status in Ireland," Working Papers 201214, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    8. Valentino Dardanoni & Giuseppe De Luca & Salvatore Modica & Franco Peracchi, 2012. "A generalized missing-indicator approach to regression with imputed covariates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 12(4), pages 575-604, December.
    9. Trimborn, Simon & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2018. "CRIX an Index for cryptocurrencies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 107-122.
    10. Prince Allotey & Ofer Harel, 2023. "Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Incomplete Data with Application to HIV Prevalence in Ghana," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 307-329, November.
    11. Kristian Kleinke & Mark Stemmler & Jost Reinecke & Friedrich Lösel, 2011. "Efficient ways to impute incomplete panel data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 351-373, December.
    12. Patrick Marsh, 2019. "Nonparametric conditional density specification testing and quantile estimation; with application to S&P500 returns," Discussion Papers 19/02, University of Nottingham, Granger Centre for Time Series Econometrics.
    13. Brady T. West & Patricia Berglund & Steven G. Heeringa, 2008. "A closer examination of subpopulation analysis of complex-sample survey data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 8(4), pages 520-531, December.
    14. Dardanoni, Valentino & Modica, Salvatore & Peracchi, Franco, 2011. "Regression with imputed covariates: A generalized missing-indicator approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 362-368, June.
    15. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Trimborn, Simon, 2015. "CRIX or evaluating blockchain based currencies," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-048, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2016-021 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Labohm, Katharina & Baaken, Dominik & Hess, Sebastian, 2021. "Mikromarktstrukturen der Rohmilchautomaten in Deutschland," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317053, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Yunxi Zhang & Soeun Kim, 2024. "Gaussian Graphical Model Estimation and Selection for High-Dimensional Incomplete Data Using Multiple Imputation and Horseshoe Estimators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Fang, Ying & Li, Qi & Wu, Ximing & Zhang, Daiqiang, 2015. "A data-driven smooth test of symmetry," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 490-501.
    20. Nitzan Cohen & Yakir Berchenko, 2021. "Normalized Information Criteria and Model Selection in the Presence of Missing Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-23, October.
    21. Fulvio Castellacci & José Miguel Natera, 2011. "A new panel dataset for cross-country analyses of national systems, growth and development (CANA)," Working Papers del Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales 1105, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:10:p:2284-2295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.