IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v71y2009i1p25-48.html

Testing for lack of fit in inverse regression—with applications to biophotonic imaging

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolai Bissantz
  • Gerda Claeskens
  • Hajo Holzmann
  • Axel Munk

Abstract

Summary. We propose two test statistics for use in inverse regression problems Y=Kθ+ɛ, where K is a given linear operator which cannot be continuously inverted. Thus, only noisy, indirect observations Y for the function θ are available. Both test statistics have a counterpart in classical hypothesis testing, where they are called the order selection test and the data‐driven Neyman smooth test. We also introduce two model selection criteria which extend the classical Akaike information criterion and Bayes information criterion to inverse regression problems. In a simulation study we show that the inverse order selection and Neyman smooth tests outperform their direct counterparts in many cases. The theory is motivated by data arising in confocal fluorescence microscopy. Here, images are observed with blurring, modelled as convolution, and stochastic error at subsequent times. The aim is then to reduce the signal‐to‐noise ratio by averaging over the distinct images. In this context it is relevant to decide whether the images are still equal, or have changed by outside influences such as moving of the object table.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolai Bissantz & Gerda Claeskens & Hajo Holzmann & Axel Munk, 2009. "Testing for lack of fit in inverse regression—with applications to biophotonic imaging," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 25-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:25-48
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00670.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00670.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00670.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerda Claeskens & Nils Lid Hjort, 2004. "Goodness of Fit via Non‐parametric Likelihood Ratios," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(4), pages 487-513, December.
    2. Holzmann, Hajo & Bissantz, Nicolai & Munk, Axel, 2007. "Density testing in a contaminated sample," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 57-75, January.
    3. Axel Munk & Nicolai Bissantz & Thorsten Wagner & Gudrun Freitag, 2005. "On difference‐based variance estimation in nonparametric regression when the covariate is high dimensional," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 19-41, February.
    4. Iain M. Johnstone & Gérard Kerkyacharian & Dominique Picard & Marc Raimondo, 2004. "Wavelet deconvolution in a periodic setting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 547-573, August.
    5. Tadeusz Inglot & Teresa Ledwina, 2001. "Intermediate Approach to Comparison of Some Goodness-of-Fit Tests," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(4), pages 810-834, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Consentino, Fabrizio & Claeskens, Gerda, 2010. "Order selection tests with multiply imputed data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 2284-2295, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bissantz, Nicolai & Holzmann, Hajo & Proksch, Katharina, 2014. "Confidence regions for images observed under the Radon transform," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 86-107.
    2. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP29/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Bissantz, Nicolai & Hohage, T. & Munk, Axel & Ruymgaart, F., 2007. "Convergence rates of general regularization methods for statistical inverse problems and applications," Technical Reports 2007,04, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    4. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2012. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP14/12, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Weijia Jia & Weixing Song, 2018. "Goodness-of-fit tests in linear EV regression with replications," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 395-421, May.
    6. Bissantz, Nicolai & Holzmann, Hajo, 2007. "Statistical inference for inverse problems," Technical Reports 2007,40, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    7. Fang, Ying & Li, Qi & Wu, Ximing & Zhang, Daiqiang, 2015. "A data-driven smooth test of symmetry," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 490-501.
    8. Otsu, Taisuke & Taylor, Luke, 2021. "Specification Testing For Errors-In-Variables Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 747-768, August.
    9. Pierre Bellec, 2015. "Optimal bounds for aggregation of affine estimators," Working Papers 2015-06, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    10. Olivier Thas, 2009. "Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed modes," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 260-264, August.
    11. Patrick Marsh, 2019. "Correction to: Nonparametric series density estimation and testing," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(1), pages 101-101, March.
    12. Valentin Patilea & François Portier, 2025. "Density model checks via the lack-of-fitness," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Eckhard Liebscher, 2012. "Model checks for parametric regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 132-155, March.
    14. Kohtaro Hitomi & Masamune Iwasawa & Yoshihiko Nishiyama, 2018. "Rate Optimal Specification Test When the Number of Instruments is Large," KIER Working Papers 986, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    15. Emiliano, Paulo C. & Vivanco, Mário J.F. & de Menezes, Fortunato S., 2014. "Information criteria: How do they behave in different models?," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 141-153.
    16. Jan Mielniczuk & Małgorzata Wojtyś, 2010. "Estimation of Fisher information using model selection," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 163-187, September.
    17. P. G. Ferrario & H. Walk, 2012. "Nonparametric partitioning estimation of residual and local variance based on first and second nearest neighbours," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 1019-1039, December.
    18. Juhyun Park & Burkhardt Seifert, 2010. "Local additive estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 171-191, March.
    19. J. Beirlant & G. Claeskens & C. Croux & H. Degryse & H. Dewachter & G. Dhaene & J. Dhaene & I. Gijbels & M. Goovaerts & M. Hubert & F. Roodhooft & W. Schouten & M. Willekens, 2005. "Managing Uncertainty: Financial, Actuarial and Statistical Modeling," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(1), pages 23-48.
    20. Janssen Arnold, 2003. "Which power of goodness of fit tests can really be expected: intermediate versus contiguous alternatives," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 301-326, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:25-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.