IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proactive Contact Tracing

Author

Listed:
  • Prateek Gupta
  • Tegan Maharaj
  • Martin Weiss
  • Nasim Rahaman
  • Hannah Alsdurf
  • Nanor Minoyan
  • Soren Harnois-Leblanc
  • Joanna Merckx
  • Andrew Williams
  • Victor Schmidt
  • Pierre-Luc St-Charles
  • Akshay Patel
  • Yang Zhang
  • David L Buckeridge
  • Christopher Pal
  • Bernhard Schölkopf
  • Yoshua Bengio

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred an unprecedented demand for interventions that can reduce disease spread without excessively restricting daily activity, given negative impacts on mental health and economic outcomes. Digital contact tracing (DCT) apps have emerged as a component of the epidemic management toolkit. Existing DCT apps typically recommend quarantine to all digitally-recorded contacts of test-confirmed cases. Over-reliance on testing may, however, impede the effectiveness of such apps, since by the time cases are confirmed through testing, onward transmissions are likely to have occurred. Furthermore, most cases are infectious over a short period; only a subset of their contacts are likely to become infected. These apps do not fully utilize data sources to base their predictions of transmission risk during an encounter, leading to recommendations of quarantine to many uninfected people and associated slowdowns in economic activity. This phenomenon, commonly termed as “pingdemic,” may additionally contribute to reduced compliance to public health measures. In this work, we propose a novel DCT framework, Proactive Contact Tracing (PCT), which uses multiple sources of information (e.g. self-reported symptoms, received messages from contacts) to estimate app users’ infectiousness histories and provide behavioral recommendations. PCT methods are by design proactive, predicting spread before it occurs. We present an interpretable instance of this framework, the Rule-based PCT algorithm, designed via a multi-disciplinary collaboration among epidemiologists, computer scientists, and behavior experts. Finally, we develop an agent-based model that allows us to compare different DCT methods and evaluate their performance in negotiating the trade-off between epidemic control and restricting population mobility. Performing extensive sensitivity analysis across user behavior, public health policy, and virological parameters, we compare Rule-based PCT to i) binary contact tracing (BCT), which exclusively relies on test results and recommends a fixed-duration quarantine, and ii) household quarantine (HQ). Our results suggest that both BCT and Rule-based PCT improve upon HQ, however, Rule-based PCT is more efficient at controlling spread of disease than BCT across a range of scenarios. In terms of cost-effectiveness, we show that Rule-based PCT pareto-dominates BCT, as demonstrated by a decrease in Disability Adjusted Life Years, as well as Temporary Productivity Loss. Overall, we find that Rule-based PCT outperforms existing approaches across a varying range of parameters. By leveraging anonymized infectiousness estimates received from digitally-recorded contacts, PCT is able to notify potentially infected users earlier than BCT methods and prevent onward transmissions. Our results suggest that PCT-based applications could be a useful tool in managing future epidemics.Author summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed the capacity of many governments undertaking contact tracing. Digital tracing applications, which automate the contact tracing process by sensing proximity between users, can limit the spread of infectious diseases, thereby reducing this burden. Though helpful in averting cases, especially when a sufficient number of people use them, such apps, due to the inefficient use of information sources, have important socioeconomic costs when lots of uninfected individuals are asked to stay at home. We proposed a digital contact tracing framework, Proactive Contact Tracing (PCT), which uses multiple sources of information to predict whether a given individual is likely to be infectious on any given day, and recommends appropriately cautious behaviors. We designed Rule-based PCT algorithm as an interpretable PCT algorithm, with the rules designed in a close collaboration with epidemiologists, computer scientists, and behavior experts. With the help of a detailed simulator, we examined how Rule-based PCT performs in comparison to a) quarantining household members, and b) recommending a fixed quarantine to digital contacts of cases identified through testing. Our cost-effective method was better able to control the epidemic while minimizing restrictions on human activity, under a wide range of simulation parameters. Our PCT framework efficiently leverages data and uses predictions to generate early warning signals and prevent cases from infecting others. Such proactive methods should be considered alongside existing interventions, including in the context of low compliance to social distancing and emergence of highly-infectious variants capable of evading vaccine-based protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Prateek Gupta & Tegan Maharaj & Martin Weiss & Nasim Rahaman & Hannah Alsdurf & Nanor Minoyan & Soren Harnois-Leblanc & Joanna Merckx & Andrew Williams & Victor Schmidt & Pierre-Luc St-Charles & Aksha, 2023. "Proactive Contact Tracing," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000199
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000199
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000199&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Briscese, Guglielmo & Lacetera, Nicola & Macis, Mario & Tonin, Mirco, 2023. "Expectations, reference points, and compliance with COVID-19 social distancing measures," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. G. Cencetti & G. Santin & A. Longa & E. Pigani & A. Barrat & C. Cattuto & S. Lehmann & M. Salathé & B. Lepri, 2021. "Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Sandile Cele & Laurelle Jackson & David S. Khoury & Khadija Khan & Thandeka Moyo-Gwete & Houriiyah Tegally & James Emmanuel San & Deborah Cromer & Cathrine Scheepers & Daniel G. Amoako & Farina Karim , 2022. "Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization," Nature, Nature, vol. 602(7898), pages 654-656, February.
    4. Pablo Rodríguez & Santiago Graña & Eva Elisa Alvarez-León & Manuela Battaglini & Francisco Javier Darias & Miguel A. Hernán & Raquel López & Paloma Llaneza & Maria Cristina Martín & Oriana Ramirez-Rub, 2021. "A population-based controlled experiment assessing the epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brodeur, Abel & Clark, Andrew E. & Fleche, Sarah & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2021. "COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Taha Y. Taha & Irene P. Chen & Jennifer M. Hayashi & Takako Tabata & Keith Walcott & Gabriella R. Kimmerly & Abdullah M. Syed & Alison Ciling & Rahul K. Suryawanshi & Hannah S. Martin & Bryan H. Bach , 2023. "Rapid assembly of SARS-CoV-2 genomes reveals attenuation of the Omicron BA.1 variant through NSP6," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanie & Adhikari, Tamanna, 2020. "A tale of three countries: How did Covid-19 lockdown impact happiness?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 584, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Jesper Akesson & Sam Ashworth-Hayes & Robert Hahn & Robert Metcalfe & Itzhak Rasooly, 2022. "Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 147-190, April.
    5. Gabriella Conti & Pamela Giustinelli, 2025. "For Better or Worse? Subjective Expectations and Cost‐Benefit Trade‐Offs in Health Behavior: An Application to Lockdown Compliance in the United Kingdom," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 992-1012, May.
    6. Hassen Kared & Asia-Sophia Wolf & Amin Alirezaylavasani & Anthony Ravussin & Guri Solum & Trung The Tran & Fridtjof Lund-Johansen & John Torgils Vaage & Lise Sofie Nissen-Meyer & Unni C. Nygaard & Ola, 2022. "Immune responses in Omicron SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in vaccinated adults," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai & Wright, Taylor, 2021. "On the effects of COVID-19 safer-at-home policies on social distancing, car crashes and pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Suman Das & Janmejay Singh & Heena Shaman & Balwant Singh & Anbalagan Anantharaj & Patil Sharanabasava & Rajesh Pandey & Rakesh Lodha & Anil Kumar Pandey & Guruprasad R. Medigeshi, 2022. "Pre-existing antibody levels negatively correlate with antibody titers after a single dose of BBV152 vaccination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Leto Peel & Tiago P. Peixoto & Manlio De Domenico, 2022. "Statistical inference links data and theory in network science," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Marcel Rolf Pfeifer, 2021. "Human Resources during COVID-19: A Monthly Survey on Mental Health and Working Attitudes of Czech Employees and Managers during the Year 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Seoryeong Park & Jaewon Choi & Yonghee Lee & Jinsung Noh & Namphil Kim & JinAh Lee & Geummi Cho & Sujeong Kim & Duck Kyun Yoo & Chang Kyung Kang & Pyoeng Gyun Choe & Nam Joong Kim & Wan Beom Park & Se, 2024. "An ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induces anti-Omicron variants antibodies by hypermutation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Delphine Planas & Timothée Bruel & Isabelle Staropoli & Florence Guivel-Benhassine & Françoise Porrot & Piet Maes & Ludivine Grzelak & Matthieu Prot & Said Mougari & Cyril Planchais & Julien Puech & M, 2023. "Resistance of Omicron subvariants BA.2.75.2, BA.4.6, and BQ.1.1 to neutralizing antibodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Massimiliano Ferraresi & Christos Kotsogiannis & Leonzio Rizzo & Riccardo Secomandi, 2020. "The ‘Great Lockdown’ and its Determinants," Working papers 91, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    14. Durante, Ruben & Guiso, Luigi & Gulino, Giorgio, 2021. "Asocial capital: Civic culture and social distancing during COVID-19," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Meriem Bekliz & Kenneth Adea & Pauline Vetter & Christiane S. Eberhardt & Krisztina Hosszu-Fellous & Diem-Lan Vu & Olha Puhach & Manel Essaidi-Laziosi & Sophie Waldvogel-Abramowski & Caroline Stephan , 2022. "Neutralization capacity of antibodies elicited through homologous or heterologous infection or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Panarello, Demetrio & Tassinari, Giorgio, 2022. "One year of COVID-19 in Italy: are containment policies enough to shape the pandemic pattern?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Raffaele Palladino & Michelangelo Mercogliano & Claudio Fiorilla & Alessandro Frangiosa & Sabrina Iodice & Stefano Sanduzzi Zamparelli & Emma Montella & Maria Triassi & Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, 2022. "Association between COVID-19 and Sick Leave for Healthcare Workers in a Large Academic Hospital in Southern Italy: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-8, August.
    18. Atul Pokharel & Robert Soulé & Avi Silberschatz, 2021. "A case for location based contact tracing," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 420-438, June.
    19. Alejandro Jara & Cristobal Cuadrado & Eduardo A. Undurraga & Christian García & Manuel Nájera & María Paz Bertoglia & Verónica Vergara & Jorge Fernández & Heriberto García-Escorza & Rafael Araos, 2023. "Effectiveness of the second COVID-19 booster against Omicron: a large-scale cohort study in Chile," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, December.
    20. Brancati, Emanuele & Brancati, Raffaele, 2020. "Heterogeneous Shocks in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Panel Evidence from Italian Firms," GLO Discussion Paper Series 649, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.