IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v12y2021i4p907-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of emotional intelligence and ethics of SME employees on knowledge sharing in Central-European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ladislav Mura

    (Pan-European University, Slovakia)

  • Tibor Zsigmond

    (J. Selye University in Komárno, Slovakia)

  • Renáta Machová

    (J. Selye University, Slovakia)

Abstract

Research background: The research examines the impact of emotional intelligence and ethics on knowledge sharing within organizations. It examines the impact of emotional intelligence (EQ) on the ethical behavior of the individual. The focus is on the individuals working in the SME sector. A questionnaire survey was considered the most appropriate technique to conduct the research. The study is based on 1162 responses, collected from three countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia). Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between knowledge sharing, ethics and emotional intelligence. Furthermore, nationality, gender, education, and the age of the respondents influencing EQ are also examined. The additional goal is to explore the factors that influence employee behavior. Methods: We identified four hypotheses. To test these hypotheses, we used variance analysis and logistic regression. The AES scale was chosen to assess EQ, which consisted of 33 items. The results obtained are compared with the opinion of SME owners resulting from structured interviews. Findings & value added: About 20% of enterprises are not using any motivation tool to initiate knowledge sharing of their employees. The most common (47.2%) reason for silencing knowledge — the lack of appreciation — did not appear among the answer of company owners. According to the employee perceptions, gender has impact on the level of emotional intelligence, while nationality, education and age group have no impact on the EQ. SME owners do not address much attention to gender. The occurrence of unethical behavior does not depend on the size of the enterprise. According to employee opinion, the EQ has positive impact on knowledge sharing, while it is not affected by ethics. The majority of owners also agreed with the positive impact of EQ. The attitude of employees and owners differ in different aspects. The results have shown that gender plays an influential role in EQ. The research of this complex problem laid down the empirical foundations for the V4 countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladislav Mura & Tibor Zsigmond & Renáta Machová, 2021. "The effects of emotional intelligence and ethics of SME employees on knowledge sharing in Central-European countries," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 907-934, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:907-934
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2021.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2021.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph McManus, 2021. "Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 153-168, February.
    2. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Aldrich, J., 1995. "Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Yule," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9502, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    4. Martina Minárová & Denisa Malá & Filip Smutný, 2020. "Emotional Intelligence of Managers in Family Businesses in Slovakia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Noman Shaheer & Jingtao Yi & Sali Li & Liang Chen, 2019. "State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 221-238, September.
    6. Rosa Forte & Tiago Oliveira, 2019. "The role of export consortia in the internationalization of small and medium enterprises: A review," International Entrepreneurship Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(4), pages 7-23.
    7. Siachou, Evangelia & Trichina, Eleni & Papasolomou, Ioanna & Sakka, Georgia, 2021. "Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 195-213.
    8. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2021. "Transparency In Public Administration As A Challenge For A Good Democratic Governance," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 149-164, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberta Dutra de Andrade & Paulo Gonçalves Pinheiro & Matheus Dantas Madeira Pontes & Thayanne Lima Duarte Pontes, 2023. "Unleashing Knowledge Sharing in Emerging Economy Startups: A Multilevel Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Marcela-Sefora Nemțeanu & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2023. "Negative Impact of Telework, Job Insecurity, and Work–Life Conflict on Employee Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Tasneem Sadiq & Rob van Tulder & Karen Maas, 2022. "Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Bilan, Yuriy & Oliinyk, Olena & Mishchuk, Halyna & Skare, Marinko, 2023. "Impact of information and communications technology on the development and use of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Nicholas A Jamnick & Javier Botella & David B Pyne & David J Bishop, 2018. "Manipulating graded exercise test variables affects the validity of the lactate threshold and V˙O2peak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. repec:rdg:wpaper:em-dp2013-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Karim M. Abadir & Gabriel Talmain, 2012. "Beyond Co-Integration: Modelling Co-Movements in Macro finance," Working Paper series 25_12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    5. Yu Yan & Shusen Qi, 2021. "I Know What I Need: Optimization of Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 311-332, November.
    6. Serrano Cinca, C. & Mar Molinero, C. & Gallizo Larraz, J.L., 2005. "Country and size effects in financial ratios: A European perspective," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 26-47, August.
    7. Jorge Hochstetter & Felipe Vásquez & Mauricio Diéguez & Ana Bustamante & Jeferson Arango-López, 2023. "Transparency and E-Government in Electronic Public Procurement as Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard, 2010. "Can statistics do without artefacts?," MPRA Paper 42867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Qin Yang & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Marek Hanusch, 2013. "Islam and democracy: a response," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 315-321, March.
    11. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2023. "Discrete Fourier Transforms of Fractional Processes with Econometric Applications," Advances in Econometrics, in: Essays in Honor of Joon Y. Park: Econometric Theory, volume 45, pages 3-71, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    12. Gerardo A. Miranda & Jennifer L. Welbourne, 2023. "Examining Incivility Through a Moral Lens: Coworker Morality Appraisals, Other-Condemning Emotions, and Instigated Incivility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 501-519, January.
    13. Kim, Ji-Hyun, 1999. "Spurious correlation between ratios with a common divisor," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 383-386, October.
    14. George Lãzãroiu & Armenia Androniceanu & Iulia Grecu & Gheorghe Grecu & Octav Neguri?ã, 2022. "Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1047-1080, December.
    15. Sood, Kirti & Singh, Simarjeet & Behl, Abhishek & Sindhwani, Rahul & Kaur, Sandeepa & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Lipovetsky, Stan & Conklin, W. Michael, 2006. "Data aggregation and Simpson's paradox gauged by index numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 334-351, July.
    17. Böddeling, Annika & Witte, Benjamin, 2011. "An investigation into the causal relation between institutions and economic development," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 9/2011, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    18. You, Wen & Davis, George C. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & McIntosh, Alex, 2005. "Parental Time and Children's Obesity Measures," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19386, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. M. Eileen Magnello, 2009. "Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 77(1), pages 3-29, April.
    20. Chen, Yantai & Luo, Haibei & Chen, Jin & Guo, Yanlin, 2022. "Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1138-1154.
    21. Charles G. Renfro, 2009. "The Practice of Econometric Theory," Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, Springer, number 978-3-540-75571-5, July-Dece.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    emotional intelligence; business ethics; personal ethics; knowledge sharing; small and medium enterprises;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:907-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.