IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05331-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How WeChat groups enhance political trust in rural China: evidence from the China Rural Revitalization Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Limin Zhao

    (Department of Economics, Party School of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Committee of CPC)

  • Xu Ma

    (Ningxia Normal University)

  • Shi Jiao

    (Institute of Curriculum and Textbook Research, Ministry of Education)

  • Chengming Hu

    (Guizhou Research Center for the Construction of the CPC)

Abstract

With the deepening implementation of the “Digital Nation” strategy, WeChat groups, as an emerging digital governance tool, have played a crucial role in the political ecology of rural China. This study utilizes data from the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey (CRRS) and employs the ordered probit model to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the intrinsic relationship and influencing mechanism between WeChat groups and political trust in rural China. Furthermore, the study identified the varying impacts of three control variables—education level, age, and region—on political trust. The findings of the study demonstrate that the establishment of WeChat groups has a considerable impact on the political trust of rural residents. Further analysis indicates that WeChat groups significantly enhance rural political trust through three pathways: strengthening rural governance performance, effectively curbing rural corruption, and expanding villagers’ political participation. Moreover, the impact of WeChat groups on political trust varies significantly across different demographic groups. Notably, the influence of rural WeChat groups on villagers with a low level of education, the rural elderly population, and villagers in rural areas of central and western China is particularly evident. Based on the above findings, in the process of promoting rural governance in China, the opportunity of technological embedding should be fully utilized to construct diversified channels for villagers’ political participation. At the same time, education on supervision and anti-corruption should be strengthened, humanistic care of digital governance should be emphasized, and technological inclusiveness of the elderly group should be enhanced in particular. By fully exploring the potential of modern technology and empowering rural political trust, we can build a harmonious, efficient and equitable rural political ecology.

Suggested Citation

  • Limin Zhao & Xu Ma & Shi Jiao & Chengming Hu, 2025. "How WeChat groups enhance political trust in rural China: evidence from the China Rural Revitalization Survey," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05331-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05331-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05331-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05331-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanisch, Marvin & Goldsby, Curtis M. & Fabian, Nicolai E. & Oehmichen, Jana, 2023. "Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Rezki, Jahen F., 2023. "Does the mobile phone affect social development? Evidence from Indonesian villages," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3).
    3. Xuanwei Zhao & Fangzhu Dong, 2025. "Digital infrastructure construction and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from Broadband China Strategy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Joanna Sleigh & Effy Vayena, 2021. "Public engagement with health data governance: the role of visuality," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Lijuan Yang, 2023. "Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Chuanfeng Sun & Guihuang Jiang & Jingqiang Zhang, 2024. "An Analysis of Hotspots, Subject Structure, and Emerging Trends in Digital Governance Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    7. Yanglin Li & Yuezheng Yang & Shuyao Shi & Bin Wang & Guangquan Chen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Seniors’ Knowledge-Based Digital Marginalization in the Era of Information Technology Advancements," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12622-12650, September.
    8. Zixue Tai & Bai He & Jianping Liu, 2023. "Local News Deserts in China: The Role of Social Media and Personal Communication Networks," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 426-436.
    9. Wang, Weihua & Zhang, Yuting & Zhao, Junjie, 2023. "Technological or social? Influencing factors and mechanisms of the psychological digital divide in rural Chinese elderly," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Bei Qin & David Strömberg & Yanhui Wu, 2017. "Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 117-140, Winter.
    11. Pablo Pedraza & Ian Vollbracht, 2023. "General theory of data, artificial intelligence and governance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Ziqiang Han & Kai Lin & Peng Tao, 2019. "Perceived Quality of Governance and Trust in Government in Rural China: A Comparison Between Villagers and Officials," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1726-1743, August.
    13. Michele Crepaz & Gizem Arikan, 2024. "The effects of transparency regulation on political trust and perceived corruption: Evidence from a survey experiment," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 896-913, July.
    14. Zixue Tai & Bai He & Jianping Liu, 2023. "Local News Deserts in China: The Role of Social Media and Personal Communication Networks," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 426-436.
    15. Zhen Zhang & Jingjing Yu & Jingyao Tian, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Community Participation, Social Capital Cultivation and Sustainable Community Renewal: A Case Study from Xi’an’s Southern Suburbs, China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11007-11040, September.
    16. Meng, Xiangyi & Zhang, Li, 2011. "Democratic participation, fiscal reform and local governance: Empirical evidence on Chinese villages," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 88-97, March.
    17. Meral Ugur-Cinar & Kursat Cinar & Tekin Kose, 2020. "How Does Education Affect Political Trust?: An Analysis of Moderating Factors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 779-808, November.
    18. Raymond Saner & Lichia Yiu & Melanie Nguyen, 2020. "Monitoring the SDGs: Digital and social technologies to ensure citizen participation, inclusiveness and transparency," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(4), pages 483-500, July.
    19. Christopher J. Anderson & Yuliya V. Tverdova, 2003. "Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 91-109, January.
    20. Hua Pang & Taoyi Yang, 2024. "Network Structure Matters: Unpacking Associations Among Informational WeChat Use, Network Heterogeneity, Network Capital, and Civic Involvement," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    21. Hilary Oliva Faxon, 2022. "Welcome to the Digital Village: Networking Geographies of Agrarian Change," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(7), pages 2096-2110, October.
    22. Zhou, Jiao & Yang, Fiona Fan & Lin, Geng & Xie, Xiaoru, 2023. "WeChat business and place identity construction in rural China: A case study of Beiqishui village, Zhouzhi county," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    23. Ernan Cui & Ran Tao & Travis J. Warner & Dali L. Yang, 2015. "How Do Land Takings Affect Political Trust in Rural China?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63, pages 91-109, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guanghua Han & Simin Yan, 2019. "Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public’s Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Fang, Ming & Lai, Weizheng & Xia, Congling, 2025. "Anti-corruption and political trust: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Yanjun Li & Hamza Umer, 2025. "The non‐linear impact of corruption investigations on political trust," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 43(3), pages 539-564, July.
    4. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    5. Kunxi Nie & Yueji Zhu, 2025. "Internet access, female’s non-farm employment, and income effects: insights from China," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Maria Kravtsova & Aleksey Oshchepkov, 2019. "Market And Network Corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 209/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Ali Abdelzadeh, 2014. "The Impact of Political Conviction on the Relation Between Winning or Losing and Political Dissatisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    8. Di Guardo, Maria Chiara & Marrocu, Emanuela & Paci, Raffaele, 2016. "The effect of local corruption on ownership strategy in cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4225-4241.
    9. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    10. Xiaoyue Yan & Mike S. Schäfer, 2025. "Multimodal climate change communication on WeChat: analyzing visual/textual clusters on China’s largest social media platform," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(7), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Gebka, Bartosz & Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Wildman, John, 2024. "The transition from COVID-19 infections to deaths: Do governance quality and corruption affect it?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 235-253.
    12. Tähtinen, Tuuli, 2024. "When Facebook Is the Internet: The Role of Social Media in Ethnic Conflict," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    14. Massimo Arnone & Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Political Trust in Italy: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Shape Confidence in Parties," Working Papers hal-04920996, HAL.
    15. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel & Luís de Sousa, 2018. "Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 653-674, November.
    16. Zafar Nazarov & Anastassia Obydenkova, 2022. "Public Health, Democracy, and Transition: Global Evidence and Post-Communism," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 261-285, February.
    17. Gabriel Caldas Montes & Paulo Henrique Luna, 2021. "Fiscal transparency, legal system and perception of the control on corruption: empirical evidence from panel data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 2005-2037, April.
    18. Meng Li & Yang Xu, 2025. "The Impact of Computing Infrastructure Construction on Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Establishment of China’s National Supercomputing C," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Wu, Tao & Delios, Andrew & Chen, Zhaowei & Wang, Xin, 2023. "Rethinking corruption in international business: An empirical review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    20. Barry Eichengreen & Orkun Saka & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "The Political Scar of Epidemics," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(660), pages 1683-1700.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05331-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.