IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v27y2025i1d10.1057_s41278-024-00291-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart ports for sustainable shipping: concept and practices revisited through the case study of China’s Tianjin port

Author

Listed:
  • Mingzheng Liu

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Kee-hung Lai

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Christina W. Y. Wong

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Xu Xin

    (Tongji University)

  • Venus Y. H. Lun

    (Logistics and Supply Chain MultiTech R&D Centre (LSCM))

Abstract

The development of smart ports is digitally transforming shipping and logistics operations, paving the way for a more sustainable shipping paradigm. Research has begun exploring this burgeoning field from diverse perspectives, from technological advancements to evaluation methodologies. Nevertheless, more research on the smart port concept is needed to gain insights into practices and evaluation. We fill the knowledge gap by applying population ecology theory to revisit the smart port concept. The “Tianjin port” is used as an illustration. By leveraging policy documents, industry research, company annual reports, and corporate social responsibility reports, we analyze the key stakeholders in the smart port ecosystem, their relationships, the system’s evolution, and the cargo and information flows within smart ports, drawing analogies to the ecological concepts of components, relationships, evolution, and flows. Based on these findings, we revisit the smart port concept from an ecological perspective. We also introduce the ecological concept of “health” into evaluating smart ports. “Health” in this paper concerns the evaluation of progress in smart port implementation (i.e., the varied pace of smart port development), overall stability (i.e., ability to maintain stable operations amid external uncertainties), and readiness for fully-fledged operations. This concept is operationalized through a novel evaluation framework comprising 4 first-level indicators (Vitality, Coordination, Development, and Growth) and 12 second-level indicators, enabling managers to identify their smart port’s development status and areas for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingzheng Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Christina W. Y. Wong & Xu Xin & Venus Y. H. Lun, 2025. "Smart ports for sustainable shipping: concept and practices revisited through the case study of China’s Tianjin port," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 27(1), pages 50-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:27:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-024-00291-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-024-00291-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-024-00291-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-024-00291-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Philipp, 2020. "Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 49-60, June.
    2. Yi Xiao & Zhuo Chen & Levi McNeil, 2022. "Digital empowerment for shipping development: a framework for establishing a smart shipping index system," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 850-863, August.
    3. Weslynne S. Ashton, 2009. "The Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Regional Industrial Ecosystem," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(2), pages 228-246, April.
    4. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    5. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Yassin Boullauazan & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander, 2023. "Developing and demonstrating a maturity model for smart ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 447-465, May.
    7. Baltazar, Ramon & Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 17 Port Governance, Devolution and the Matching Framework: A Configuration Theory Approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 379-403, January.
    8. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Olaf Merk, 2014. "Time Efficiency at World Container Ports," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/8, OECD Publishing.
    9. Li, Kevin X. & Li, Mengchi & Zhu, Yuhan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Tong, Hao & Zhou, Haoqing, 2023. "Smart port: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    11. Alaa Othman & Sara El-gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Alberto Rodrigo González & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Beatriz Molina Serrano & Alberto Camarero Orive, 2020. "Preparation of a Smart Port Indicator and Calculation of a Ranking for the Spanish Port System," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Daozhi Zhao & Tianyi Wang & Hongshuai Han, 2020. "Approach towards Sustainable and Smart Coal Port Development: The Case of Huanghua Port in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    14. G. Tomas M. Hult & Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez & Katarina Lagerström, 2020. "The theoretical evolution and use of the Uppsala Model of internationalization in the international business ecosystem," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(1), pages 38-49, February.
    15. Sheng-Che Lin & Hsien-Kuo Chang & Ying-Feng Chung, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    16. J. Barona & F. Ballini & M. Canepa, 2023. "Circular developments of maritime industrial ports in Europe: a semi-systematic review of the current situation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    17. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    18. Jia, Xiaohui & Cui, Yongmei, 2021. "Examining interrelationships of barriers in the evolution of maritime port smartification from a systematic perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 49-58.
    19. Oh, Deog-Seong & Phillips, Fred & Park, Sehee & Lee, Eunghyun, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-6.
    20. Jonas Mendes Constante & Peter W. Langen & Salvador Furió Pruñonosa, 2023. "Innovation ecosystems in ports: a comparative analysis of Rotterdam and Valencia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Antonios Paraskevas & Michael Madas & Vasileios Zeimpekis & Konstantinos Fouskas, 2024. "Smart Ports in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Li, Kevin X. & Li, Mengchi & Zhu, Yuhan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Tong, Hao & Zhou, Haoqing, 2023. "Smart port: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Alaa Othman & Sara El-gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Sheng-Che Lin & Hsien-Kuo Chang & Ying-Feng Chung, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Pedro López-Rubio & Norat Roig-Tierno & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2020. "Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Lepore, Dominique & Frontoni, Emanuele & Micozzi, Alessandra & Moccia, Sara & Romeo, Luca & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2023. "Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the COVID-19 crisis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-86.
    10. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Halil Ibrahim Cicekdagi & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Mehmet Cabir Akkoyunlu, 2023. "Enhancing search and rescue team performance: investigating factors behind social loafing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(3), pages 1315-1340, December.
    12. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    13. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    15. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Li, Zhaochen & Xu, Zimu, 2025. "Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    18. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    19. Alberto Tejero & Victor Rodriguez-Doncel & Ivan Pau, 2020. "Knowledge Graphs for Innovation Ecosystems," Papers 2001.08615, arXiv.org.
    20. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:27:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-024-00291-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.