IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jobman/v32y2025i3d10.1057_s41262-025-00379-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical validation of a new technique (‘select-and-rank’) to measure brand preference

Author

Listed:
  • Kosmo Karantonis

    (University of Southern Denmark)

  • Oliver Schnittka

    (University of Southern Denmark)

  • Mario Farsky

    (Boston Consulting Group (BCG))

  • Henrik Sattler

    (University of Hamburg)

Abstract

This study introduces and validates a novel quantitative survey-based technique (select-and-rank, SAR) designed to measure brand preference as an outcome of consumer-based brand equity (CBBE). The SAR method combines simplicity with predictive accuracy by leveraging a ranking-based approach leaning on a Zipf distribution—a model demonstrated to effectively represent market shares. Its development addresses the need for a practical and reliable tool in large-scale brand studies, distinguishing itself from traditional methods by offering improved measurement capabilities and reduced cognitive load. Using data from a market representative sample, this initial study demonstrates SAR’s ability to accurately capture brand preference dynamics while comparing its performance against widely used existing measurement techniques. The findings reveal SAR’s enhanced accuracy, robustness, and scalability, making it a valuable addition to the CBBE research toolkit. The study also highlights managerial implications, offering brand managers a technique to capture consumer preferences to assist in optimizing brand positioning and strategy in competitive markets. Finally, recommendations for future research are provided to extend SAR’s application to additional dimensions of CBBE.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosmo Karantonis & Oliver Schnittka & Mario Farsky & Henrik Sattler, 2025. "Empirical validation of a new technique (‘select-and-rank’) to measure brand preference," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(3), pages 227-237, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:32:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1057_s41262-025-00379-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41262-025-00379-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41262-025-00379-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41262-025-00379-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louviere, Jordan J. & Islam, Towhidul, 2008. "A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(9), pages 903-911, September.
    2. Sanaz Farjam & Xu Hongyi, 2015. "Reviewing the Concept of Brand Equity and Evaluating Consumer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) Models," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(8), pages 14-29, July.
    3. Karniouchina, Ekaterina V. & Moore, William L. & van der Rhee, Bo & Verma, Rohit, 2009. "Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 340-348, August.
    4. Vithala R. Rao, 2014. "Applied Conjoint Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-540-87753-0, December.
    5. Menictas, Con & Wang, Paul Z. & Louviere, Jordan J., 2012. "Assessing the validity of brand equity constructs," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-8.
    6. Min Ding & Rajdeep Grewal & John Liechty, 2005. "Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis," Framed Field Experiments 00139, The Field Experiments Website.
    7. Mario Farsky & Oliver Schnittka & Henrik Sattler & Björn Höfer & Carina Lorth, 2017. "Brand-anchored discrete choice experiment (BDCE) vs. direct attribute rating (DAR): An empirical comparison of predictive validity," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 231-240, June.
    8. Voleti, Sudhir & Srinivasan, V. & Ghosh, Pulak, 2017. "An approach to improve the predictive power of choice-based conjoint analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 325-335.
    9. Travis Tae Oh & Kevin Lane Keller & Scott A. Neslin & David J. Reibstein & Donald R. Lehmann, 2020. "The past, present, and future of brand research," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 151-162, September.
    10. Maren Hein & Peter Kurz & Winfried J. Steiner, 2020. "Analyzing the capabilities of the HB logit model for choice-based conjoint analysis: a simulation study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 1-36, February.
    11. Anja Plumeyer & Pascal Kottemann & Daniel Böger & Reinhold Decker, 2019. "Measuring brand image: a systematic review, practical guidance, and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 227-265, April.
    12. Netemeyer, Richard G. & Krishnan, Balaji & Pullig, Chris & Wang, Guangping & Yagci, Mehmet & Dean, Dwane & Ricks, Joe & Wirth, Ferdinand, 2004. "Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 209-224, February.
    13. Heo, Cindy Yoonjoung & Kim, Bona & Park, Kwangsoo & Back, Robin M., 2022. "A comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Likert Scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 368-377.
    14. de Haan, Evert & Verhoef, Peter C. & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2015. "The predictive ability of different customer feedback metrics for retention," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 195-206.
    15. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Cheng, Haotian & Zhang, Tong & Lambert, Dayton M. & Feuz, Ryan, 2023. "An empirical comparison of conjoint and best-worst scaling case III methods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    2. Deli Yang & Mahmut Sonmez & Mario Gonzalez & Yi Liu & Carol Y. Yoder, 2019. "Consumer-based brand equity and consumer-based brand performance: evidence from smartphone brands in the USA," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 717-732, November.
    3. Meise, Jan Niklas & Rudolph, Thomas & Kenning, Peter & Phillips, Diane M., 2014. "Feed them facts: Value perceptions and consumer use of sustainability-related product information," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 510-519.
    4. Hein, Maren & Goeken, Nils & Kurz, Peter & Steiner, Winfried J., 2022. "Using Hierarchical Bayes draws for improving shares of choice predictions in conjoint simulations: A study based on conjoint choice data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 630-651.
    5. Verena Sablotny-Wackershauser & Marcel Lichters & Daniel Guhl & Paul Bengart & Bodo Vogt, 2024. "Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 610-633, May.
    6. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    7. Coderre, François & Sirieix, Lucie & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2022. "The facets of consumer-based food label equity: Measurement, structure and managerial relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Raffaele Filieri & Zhibin Lin & Simona D’Antone & Elena Chatzopoulou, 2019. "A cultural approach to brand equity: the role of brand mianzi and brand popularity in China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 376-394, July.
    9. Rina Makgosa & Boikanyo A. Molefhi, 2012. "Rebranding an Institution of Higher Education in Botswana," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Prashant Kumar & Tao Meng & Sajal Kabiraj, 2019. "Effect of Crowdsourcing on Consumer Brand Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 42-58, January.
    11. Anselmsson, Johan & Bondesson, Niklas, 2015. "Brand value chain in practise; the relationship between mindset and market performance metrics: A study of the Swedish market for FMCG," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 58-70.
    12. Tzu-En Lu & Yi-Hsuan Lee & Jer-Wei Hsu, 2020. "Does Service Recovery Really Work? The Multilevel Effects of Online Service Recovery Based on Brand Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Developing a Sustainable Omnichannel Strategic Framework toward Circular Revolution: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Rajesh Sharma, 2020. "Building Consumer-based Brand Equity for Fast Fashion Apparel Brands in the Indian Consumer Market," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 45(3), pages 337-365, August.
    15. Buil, Isabel & de Chernatony, Leslie & Martínez, Eva, 2013. "Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-122.
    16. Abhishek Mishra, 2014. "Effect of Experiential Value on Consumer-Based Brand Equity: An Interactive Device Perspective," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(4), pages 396-410, November.
    17. Abhishek Dwivedi & Dean Wilkie & Lester Johnson & Jay Weerawardena, 2016. "Establishing measures and drivers of consumer brand engagement behaviours," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 41-69, September.
    18. Rahhal El Makkaoui, 2023. "Nature of Customer Experience in the Sharing Economy [La nature de l'expérience client dans l'économie collaborative]," Post-Print hal-04450139, HAL.
    19. Katharina Petra Zeugner Roth & Adamantios Diamantopoulos & Mª Ángeles Montesinos, 2008. "Home Country Image, Country Brand Equity and Consumers’ Product Preferences: An Empirical Study," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 577-602, November.
    20. Bose, Sunny & Roy, Sanjit Kumar & Alwi, Sharifah Faridah Syed & Nguyen, Bang, 2020. "Measuring customer based place brand equity (CBPBE) from a public diplomacy perspective: Evidence from West Bengal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 734-744.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:32:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1057_s41262-025-00379-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.