IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jbkreg/v21y2020i3d10.1057_s41261-019-00109-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fragmented approach toward close-out netting provisions in Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore compared

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Walters

    (Victoria University
    The New University)

  • Leon Trakman

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

Close-out netting provisions are a relatively new addition to the financial legal framework. Their primary objective is to strengthen the regulation and manage the risk associated with over-the-counter derivatives. They have been adopted by the financial industry and used in financial transactions to assist in controlling and allocating financial risks. They are becoming an effective tool that provides an efficient process in calculating and settling on a net balance. However, they have been criticized for being unable to save some of the larger financial institution throughout the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. This paper examines how close-out netting provisions are applied under the UNIDROIT Principles which serves as the benchmark on how jurisdictions have incorporated them into national law. It examines the current approach taken by Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, stressing their importance in the increasing interconnected financial markets across Southeast Asia and Oceania. While this paper is limited in its scope only referring to the international framework and four national countries, the analysis undertaken can arguably be applied to other national and supranational legal systems. The paper challenges the fragmented approach to regulation of close-out netting provisions in a global setting. It highlights the divergent approaches currently adopted in defining, negotiating, drafting, interpreting and enforcing close-out netting provisions. It argues that nation states should adapt the UNIDROIT Principles in light of their national law and policy. It also presents a way forward in enforcing close-out netting provisions within contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Walters & Leon Trakman, 2020. "The fragmented approach toward close-out netting provisions in Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore compared," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 224-240, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1057_s41261-019-00109-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41261-019-00109-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41261-019-00109-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41261-019-00109-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bliss, Robert R. & Kaufman, George G., 2006. "Derivatives and systemic risk: Netting, collateral, and closeout," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 55-70, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vuillemey, Guillaume & Peltonen, Tuomas A., 2015. "Disentangling the bond–CDS nexus: A stress test model of the CDS market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-45.
    2. Tallman, Ellis W & Wicker, Elmus R., 2009. "Banking and Financial Crises in United States History: What Guidance can History Offer Policymakers?," MPRA Paper 21839, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Robert R. Bliss & George G. Kaufman, 2006. "A comparison of U.S. corporate and bank insolvency resolution," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 30(Q II), pages 44-55.
    4. Darrell Duffie & Haoxiang Zhu, 2011. "Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 74-95.
    5. Sabrina Pellerin & John R. Walter, 2012. "Orderly liquidation authority as an alternative to bankruptcy," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 98(1Q), pages 1-31.
    6. Arping, Stefan, 2014. "Credit protection and lending relationships," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 7-19.
    7. Peltonen, Tuomas A. & Scheicher, Martin & Vuillemey, Guillaume, 2014. "The network structure of the CDS market and its determinants," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 118-133.
    8. Guillaume Vuillemey, 2015. "Derivatives markets : from bank risk management to financial stability [Les marchés de dérivés : gestion des risques bancaires et stabilité financière]," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03507099, HAL.
    9. Matej Marinc & Razvan Vlahu, 2011. "The Economic Perspective of Bank Bankruptcy Law," DNB Working Papers 310, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    10. Donaldson, Jason & Micheler, Eva, 2016. "Resaleable debt and systemic risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119000, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Mr. John Kiff & Ms. Jennifer A. Elliott & Mr. Elias G. Kazarian & Ms. Jodi G Scarlata & Carolyne Spackman, 2009. "Credit Derivatives: Systemic Risks and Policy Options?," IMF Working Papers 2009/254, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Donaldson, Jason Roderick & Micheler, Eva, 2018. "Resaleable debt and systemic risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 485-504.
    13. Chryssa Papathanassiou, 2012. "Central Counterparties and Derivatives," Chapters, in: Kern Alexander & Rahul Dhumale (ed.), Research Handbook on International Financial Regulation, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Loon, Yee Cheng & Zhong, Zhaodong Ken, 2014. "The impact of central clearing on counterparty risk, liquidity, and trading: Evidence from the credit default swap market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 91-115.
    15. Harrison, Ian & Anderson, Steve & Twaddle, James, 2007. "Pre-positioning for effective resolution of bank failures," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 324-341, December.
    16. Hitoshi Hayakawa, 2018. "Does a central clearing counterparty reduce liquidity needs?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 13(1), pages 9-50, April.
    17. Michael J. Fleming & Asani Sarkar, 2013. "The failure resolution of Lehman Brothers," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Dec, pages 175-206.
    18. Vicente, L.A.B.G. & Cerezetti, F.V. & De Faria, S.R. & Iwashita, T. & Pereira, O.R., 2015. "Managing risk in multi-asset class, multimarket central counterparties: The CORE approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 119-130.
    19. EDOARDO GAFFEO & Lucio Gobbi & Massimo Molinari, 2018. "Bilateral netting and systemic liquidity shortages in banking networks," DEM Working Papers 2018/06, Department of Economics and Management.
    20. Arora, Navneet & Gandhi, Priyank & Longstaff, Francis A., 2012. "Counterparty credit risk and the credit default swap market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 280-293.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1057_s41261-019-00109-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.