IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ijodag/v16y2019i2d10.1057_s41310-019-00062-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social responsibility indicators: perspective of stakeholders in Brazil and in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Rosane Maria Seibert

    () (Rua Universidade das Missões)

  • Clea Beatriz Macagnan

    ()

  • Robert Dixon

    () (Durham University Business School – DUBS)

  • Davi Souza Simon

Abstract

This article aimed at the construction of representative indicators of social responsibility information, from the perspective of stakeholders in Brazil and the UK, for the disclosure of Philanthropic Higher Education Organizations (PHEOs) in its Internet websites. Using the grounded theory techniques, we raised evidence that enabled us to identify social responsibility information valued by PHEOs stakeholders in Brazil and the UK. We developed the research in four phases: systematization, evaluation, valuation and econometric validation of the indicators. As a result, we have built a relationship that includes 186 indicators of stakeholder interests. Of these, we identified 84 indicators, subdivided into ten categories of social responsibility, which include the indicators considered most relevant by the experts and stakeholders for the PHEOs disclosure. The article contributes to the formulation of the PHEOs disclosure policies and to the recommendations and regulations of the institutional bodies at the moment in which it demonstrates the information of interest of the stakeholders, as well as those that should be highlighted in the first place because they are considered more relevant. Therefore, from the results of this research, the PHEOs disclosure has the possibility to reflect the interests of external stakeholders, adding value to the transparency and accountability of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosane Maria Seibert & Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Robert Dixon & Davi Souza Simon, 2019. "Social responsibility indicators: perspective of stakeholders in Brazil and in the UK," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(2), pages 128-144, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:16:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-019-00062-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41310-019-00062-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41310-019-00062-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Corina Joseph & Ross Taplin, 2011. "The measurement of sustainability disclosure: Abundance versus occurrence," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 19-31, March.
    3. Robert M. Bushman & Abbie Smith, "undated". "Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance," Economic Policy Review y:2003:i:apr:p:65-87:n:v., Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. S. Zainon & R. Atan & Y. Bee Wah, 2014. "An empirical study on the determinants of information disclosure of Malaysian non-profit organizations," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(1), pages 35-55, April.
    5. Susan Lee Conway & Patricia Ann O'Keefe & Sue Louise Hrasky, 2015. "Legitimacy, accountability and impression management in NGOs: the Indian Ocean tsunami," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(7), pages 1075-1098, September.
    6. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2000. "The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1441-1478.
    7. Verrecchia, Robert E., 2001. "Essays on disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 97-180, December.
    8. Joseph, Corina & Taplin, Ross, 2011. "The measurement of sustainability disclosure: Abundance versus occurrence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 19-31.
    9. K.A.K. Gnanaweera & N. Kunori, 2018. "Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1423872-142, January.
    10. Caterina Pesci & Ericka Costa & Teerooven Soobaroyen, 2015. "The forms of repetition in social and environmental reports: insights from Hume's notion of 'impressions'," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6-7), pages 738-764, December.
    11. Bowman, Edward H. & Haire, Mason, 1976. "Social impact disclosure and corporate annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 11-21, January.
    12. Barry Ackers & Neil Stuart Eccles, 2015. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(4), pages 515-550, May.
    13. Core, John E., 2001. "A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 441-456, September.
    14. Andrews, Abigail, 2014. "Downward Accountability in Unequal Alliances: Explaining NGO Responses to Zapatista Demands," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 99-113.
    15. Contrafatto, Massimo, 2014. "The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 414-432.
    16. Ana Gisbert & Begoña Navallas & Domi Romero, 2014. "Proprietary costs, governance and the segment disclosure decision," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 733-763, August.
    17. Najah Attig & Sean Cleary, 2015. "Managerial Practices and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 121-136, September.
    18. Hofmann, Mary Ann & McSwain, Dwayne, 2013. "Financial disclosure management in the nonprofit sector: A framework for past and future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 61-87.
    19. Stuart Cooper & Richard Slack, 2015. "Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6-7), pages 801-840, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:16:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-019-00062-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.