IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v25y2022i1d10.1057_s41299-021-00110-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Approach to Measuring University Reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Katie Angliss

    (University of Plymouth)

Abstract

Competition among universities has existed for many decades, with universities now under intense scrutiny due to increased marketisation with perceptions of their reputation becoming ever more important to remain competitive. Current measures of university reputation, such as league table rankings, focus predominantly on student achievement and research success. However, these measures do not consider perceptions from these institutions’ diverse range of stakeholders. Measuring reputation from multiple stakeholders and multiple areas of organisations has previously been done in for-profit organisations using the RepTrak™ model. Nevertheless, the characteristics used in this model have not been tested for their applicability to measure University reputation within the United Kingdom, presenting an opportunity measure and understand university reputation from alternative globally accepted criteria. Data were collected through online questionnaires that received 594 responses, and analysed using Exploratory, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis. This research confirms characteristics used in the RepTrak™ model are also applicable to measuring a university’s reputation, offering a clearer measure of university reputation from multiple stakeholder groups. Key findings identified differing perceptions of the importance of measured characteristics by internal and external stakeholders, with ‘performance’ and ‘products and services’ perceived as the most important, respectively. These findings provide clear evidence for the need to tailor marketing and PR communications to different audiences to maximise opportunities for improving perceptions of a university’s reputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Angliss, 2022. "An Alternative Approach to Measuring University Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 33-49, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00110-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-021-00110-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-021-00110-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-021-00110-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Un Yang & Sue Westcott Alessandri & Dennis F. Kinsey, 2008. "An Integrative Analysis of Reputation and Relational Quality: A Study of University-Student Relationships," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 145-170, March.
    2. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    3. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & Krey, Nina & Babin, Barry J. & Ivens, Bjoern S., 2016. "Brand management in higher education: The University Brand Personality Scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3077-3086.
    4. Pucciarelli, Francesca & Kaplan, Andreas, 2016. "Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-320.
    5. Juana Patlán Pérez & Edgar Martínez Torres, 2017. "Evaluation of the organizational image of a university in a higher education institution," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(1), pages 123-140, Enero-Mar.
    6. Caruana, Albert & Ewing, Michael T., 2010. "How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1103-1110, September.
    7. Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando, Amaia & Zorrilla, Pilar & Forcada, Javier, 2018. "A Review Of Higher Education Image And Reputation Literature: Knowledge Gaps And A Research Agenda," European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 24(1), pages 8-16.
    8. Plewa, Carolin & Ho, Joanne & Conduit, Jodie & Karpen, Ingo O., 2016. "Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3087-3095.
    9. Deephouse, David L. & Newburry, William & Soleimani, Abrahim, 2016. "The effects of institutional development and national culture on cross-national differences in corporate reputation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 463-473.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marelby Amado & Alfredo Guzmán & Fernando Juarez, 2023. "Relationship between perceived value, student experience, and university reputation: structural equation modeling," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. María Dolores Aledo‐Ruiz & Eva Martínez‐Caro & José Manuel Santos‐Jaén, 2022. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 578-592, May.
    3. Bernhard Swoboda & Cathrin Huber & Tassilo Schuster & Johannes Hirschmann, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Effects Across Nations: The Impact of Country Distances and Firm-Specific Resources," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 717-748, October.
    4. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    5. Prashant Mahajan & Vaishali Patil, 2021. "Making it normal for new enrollments: Effect of institutional and pandemic influence on selecting an engineering institution under the COVID-19 pandemic situation," Papers 2103.13297, arXiv.org.
    6. Gill, Seerat Kaur & Dhir, Amandeep & Singh, Gurparkash & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Transformative Quality in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Conceptualisation, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 275-286.
    7. Zubaida Qazi & Wasim Qazi & Syed Ali Raza & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2022. "The Antecedents Affecting University Reputation and Student Satisfaction: A Study in Higher Education Context," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 253-271, November.
    8. Terason Sid, 2021. "Predicting Sports Facility Revisit Intentions Based on Experience and Mediating Effects of Perceived Value," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 35-41, September.
    9. S. Venus Jin & Aziz Muqaddam, 2019. "Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 522-537, September.
    10. Jayanti, Rama K. & Raghunath, S., 2018. "Institutional entrepreneur strategies in emerging economies: Creating market exclusivity for the rising affluent," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 87-98.
    11. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    12. Iuliana Pârvu & Dragos Mihai Ipate, 2022. "Customer Segments On The Higher Education Market," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 56(2), pages 141-147.
    13. Faiz Muhammad Khuwaja & Waheed Ali Umrani & Sanober Salman Shaikh & Ammar Ahmed & Sanaullah Shar, 2019. "University Markor: A Context-Specific Scale to Measure Market-Orientation in Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    14. Dowling, Michael & O’Gorman, Colm & Puncheva, Petya & Vanwalleghem, Dieter, 2019. "Trust and SME attitudes towards equity financing across Europe," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    15. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    16. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    17. Boddewyn, Jean J. & Peng, Mike W., 2021. "Reciprocity and informal institutions in international market entry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    18. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    19. Andrea Pérez & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque, 2015. "How Customer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility Influences the Image of Companies: Evidence from the Banking Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 155-168, May.
    20. Carroll, Ryall & Kachersky, Luke, 2019. "Service fundraising and the role of perceived donation efficacy in individual charitable giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 254-263.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00110-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.