IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Trends in child care use and cost between 1999 and 2002

Listed author(s):
  • Justine McNamara


    (University of Canberra)

  • Rebecca Cassells

    (University of Canberra)

Despite the widely-acknowledged importance of high quality, affordable child care, quantitative research into child care policy in Australia is relatively limited. In this study, recently-released data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ 1999 and 2002 Child Care Surveys are used to examine trends in formal and informal child care use and costs for children not yet attending school over the three year period between the two surveys. The data were analysed using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Remote Access Data Laboratory (RADL). The time period examined is particularly important in policy terms, as the new Child Care Benefit (CCB) was introduced in July 2000. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses are employed in examining the data. Results show a statistically significant increase in the use of long day care and family day care services between 1999 and 2002, accompanied by a fall in the use of informal care services. Increases in formal care use appeared to be stronger for some groups, including children whose mothers worked part-time, and children from low income families. Parents’ out-of-pocket costs for care fell very slightly in real terms over the period, with more substantial falls in costs for sole parent and low income families.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School in its journal Australian Journal of Labour Economics.

Volume (Year): 9 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
Pages: 125-146

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:9:y:2006:i:2:p:125-146
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:9:y:2006:i:2:p:125-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.