IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v31y2009i4p695-711.html

Submission Patterns, Submission Policies, and Revealed Preferences for Agricultural Economics Journals

Author

Listed:
  • Jayson L. Lusk
  • M. Darren Hudson

Abstract

We document the submission, rejection, and resubmission patterns of ninety-six papers published in five agricultural and environmental economics journals and use this information to infer authors' preferences among the set of journals. These data are augmented with stated preferences about submission fees, page charges, and membership requirements to forecast the effect of chances in journal submission policies on submission rates. We predict that if the American Journal of Agricultural Economics were to eliminate page charges and adopt a $100 submission fee, submissions to the journal would rise 18% and submissions to the Review of Agricultural Economics would fall 6.5%. Copyright 2009 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association

Suggested Citation

  • Jayson L. Lusk & M. Darren Hudson, 2009. "Submission Patterns, Submission Policies, and Revealed Preferences for Agricultural Economics Journals," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 695-711, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:31:y:2009:i:4:p:695-711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeynep Didem Unutmaz Durmuşoğlu & Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, 2021. "A TOPSIS model for understanding the authors choice of journal selection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 521-543, January.
    2. Petrolia, Daniel R. & Hudson, Darren, 2013. "Why Is the Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics Not in the Major Citation Indices and Does It Really Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 381-388, August.
    3. Hayk Amirkhanyan & Michał Krawczyk & Maciej Wilamowski, 2023. "Do male and female authors employ different journal choice strategies?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 5905-5928, November.
    4. Bachir Kassas & Glory E. Orivri & Marco A. Palma & Octavio Ramirez, 2025. "Assessing research output quality in agricultural economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 4-24, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:31:y:2009:i:4:p:695-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Oxford University Press to update the entry or send us the correct address or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.