IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v44y2018i6p1325-1342..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a Consumable Past: How Memory Making Shapes Marketization

Author

Listed:
  • Katja H Brunk
  • Markus Giesler
  • Benjamin J Hartmann
  • Darren DahlEditor
  • Craig ThompsonAssociate Editor

Abstract

Consumer researchers tend to equate successful marketization—the transition from a socialist to a capitalist economy—with the consensual acquiescence to an idealized definition of the socialist past. For this reason, little research has examined how memories about socialism influence marketization over time. To redress this gap, we bring prior consumer research on commercial mythmaking and popular memory to bear on an in-depth analysis of the marketization of the former German Democratic Republic. We find that, owing to a progressive sequence of conflicts between commercialized memories of socialism promoted by marketing agents and countermemories advocating socialism as a political alternative, definitions of the past, and by extension, capitalism’s hegemony are subject to ongoing contestation and change. Our theoretical framework of hegemonic memory making explains relationships among consumption, memory making, and market systems that have not been recognized by prior research on consumption and nostalgia.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja H Brunk & Markus Giesler & Benjamin J Hartmann & Darren DahlEditor & Craig ThompsonAssociate Editor, 2018. "Creating a Consumable Past: How Memory Making Shapes Marketization," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2018:i:6:p:1325-1342.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucx100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauline Maclaran & Stephen Brown, 2005. "The Center Cannot Hold: Consuming the Utopian Marketplace," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 311-323, September.
    2. Holbrook, Morris B, 1993. "Nostalgia and Consumption Preferences: Some Emerging Patterns of Consumer Tastes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 245-256, September.
    3. Stephen Brown & Pierre McDonagh & Clifford J. Shultz II, 2013. "Titanic: Consuming the Myths and Meanings of an Ambiguous Brand," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 595-614.
    4. Kozinets, Robert V, 2002. "Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 20-38, June.
    5. Michelle F. Weinberger & Melanie Wallendorf, 2012. "Intracommunity Gifting at the Intersection of Contemporary Moral and Market Economies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 74-92.
    6. Markus Giesler & Craig J. Thompson, 2016. "A Tutorial in Consumer Research: Process Theorization in Cultural Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 497-508.
    7. Craig Thompson & Kelly Tian, 2008. "Reconstructing the South: How Commercial Myths Compete for Identity Value through the Ideological Shaping of Popular Memories and Countermemories," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(5), pages 595-613, July.
    8. Marius K. Luedicke & Craig J. Thompson & Markus Giesler, 2010. "Consumer Identity Work as Moral Protagonism: How Myth and Ideology Animate a Brand-Mediated Moral Conflict," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(6), pages 1016-1032, April.
    9. Robin Canniford & Avi Shankar, 2013. "Purifying Practices: How Consumers Assemble Romantic Experiences of Nature," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1069.
    10. Lily Dong & Kelly Tian, 2009. "The Use of Western Brands in Asserting Chinese National Identity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 504-523.
    11. Markus Giesler & Ela Veresiu, 2014. "Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 840-857.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amatulli, Cesare & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Sestino, Andrea & Guido, Gianluigi & Belk, Russell, 2023. "The influence of a lockdown on consumption: An exploratory study on generation Z's consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Kwan, Canice M.C. & Cheng, Shirley Y.Y. & Tsang, Alex S.L., 2023. "Societal reminiscence and decisions for a better society: A belief in progress explanation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    4. Zanette, Maria Carolina & Brito, Eliane Pereira Zamith & Fontenelle, Isleide Arruda & de Camargo Heck, Marina, 2021. "Eating one’s own otherness: When producers commercialize their ethnicities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 134-144.
    5. Hartmann, Benjamin J. & Brunk, Katja H., 2019. "Nostalgia marketing and (re-)enchantment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 669-686.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:904-925. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bernd Schmitt & J Joško Brakus & Alessandro Biraglia, 2022. "Consumption Ideology [Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 74-95.
    3. Hartmann, Benjamin J. & Brunk, Katja H., 2019. "Nostalgia marketing and (re-)enchantment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 669-686.
    4. Hong, Soonkwan & Vicdan, Handan, 2016. "Re-imagining the utopian: Transformation of a sustainable lifestyle in ecovillages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 120-136.
    5. Robert Caruana & Sarah Glozer & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2020. "‘Alternative Hedonism’: Exploring the Role of Pleasure in Moral Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 143-158, September.
    6. Husemann, Katharina C. & Eckhardt, Giana M. & Grohs, Reinhard & Saceanu, Raluca E., 2016. "The dynamic interplay between structure, anastructure and antistructure in extraordinary experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3361-3370.
    7. Bernard Cova, 2021. "The new frontier of consumer experiences: escape through pain," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 60-69, June.
    8. Aleksandrina Atanasova, 2021. "Re-examining utopia in contemporary consumption: conceptualization and implications for marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 23-39, June.
    9. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    10. Jack Coffin & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2021. "The Möbius strip of market spatiality: mobilizing transdisciplinary dialogues between CCT and the marketing mainstream," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 40-59, June.
    11. Ulusoy, Ebru, 2016. "Experiential responsible consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 284-297.
    12. Nguyen, Hieu P. & Chen, Steven & Mukherjee, Sayantani, 2014. "Reverse stigma in the Freegan community," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1877-1884.
    13. Kozinets, Robert V., 2019. "YouTube utopianism: Social media profanation and the clicktivism of capitalist critique," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 65-81.
    14. Justyna Kramarczyk & Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2022. "Accumulative vs. Appreciative Expressions of Materialism: Revising Materialism in Light of Polish Simplifiers and New Materialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 701-719, February.
    15. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.
    16. Donald R. Lehmann & Jeffrey R. Parker, 2017. "Disadoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 36-51, June.
    17. Stoeckl, Verena E. & Luedicke, Marius K., 2015. "Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2452-2463.
    18. Vivien Blanchet, 2020. "Happy Christmases are all alike; each unhappy Christmas is unhappy in its own way," Post-Print hal-02437257, HAL.
    19. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2017. "Liquid Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 582-597.
    20. Rebecca Scott & Julien Cayla & Bernard Cova, 2017. "Selling Pain to the Saturated Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 22-43.
    21. McGinnis, Lee Phillip & Gentry, James W., 2009. "Underdog consumption: An exploration into meanings and motives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 191-199, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2018:i:6:p:1325-1342.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.