IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-667202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Purifying Practices: How Consumers Assemble Romantic Experiences of Nature

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Canniford
  • Avi Shankar

Abstract

Prior consumer research theorizes nature as an ideal stage for romantic consumption experiences by framing nature as external to culture. The same studies, however, problematize this framing by highlighting the consumer-cultural resources through which nature is harnessed and interpreted. Through an ethnography of surfing culture, this article theorizes consumers' experiences of nature as emerging from assemblages of heterogeneous resources. A theory of assemblage shows that material geographies are vital to the reproduction of romantic discourses. Assemblages of nature are characterized by fragility and contestation, however, due to service structures, technological resources, and social tensions that betray the ideal of external nature. Consumers overcome these contradictions through purifying practices. Purifying practices preserve romantic beliefs that nature is external to culture by masking or purging problematic elements of assemblages. The negative environmental effects of these practices are discussed and compared with sustainable purifying practices that redress the damaging impact of consuming nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Canniford & Avi Shankar, 2013. "Purifying Practices: How Consumers Assemble Romantic Experiences of Nature," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1069.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/667202
    DOI: 10.1086/667202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/667202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/667202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/667202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/667202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.