IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v16y2021i4p1217-1228..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-evolutionary game of manufacturers’ abatement behavior under carbon tax-subsidy policy
[Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is better response to global warming than cap and trade]

Author

Listed:
  • Suyong Zhang
  • Chuanxu Wang
  • Panos M Pardalos

Abstract

In the context of carbon tax-subsidy policy, our paper develops the models of the tripartite evolutionary game between consumers, manufacturers and local governments and analyzes the impacts of carbon tax-subsidy policy on the strategies of consumers, manufacturers and local governments. Through the construction of replicated dynamic equations, we get the evolutionary stable strategy. Then, the numerical analysis is performed with system dynamics simulation. The results show that (i) the local governments should strengthen the consumers’ awareness of environmental protection through higher financial subsidies, (ii) the taxation intensity coefficient accelerates the dynamic system to evolve into a stable state and (iii) an appropriate punishment by the government accelerates the dynamic system to evolve into a stable state. Our research is expected to provide a reference for local governments to implement effective carbon tax-subsidy policy on manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Suyong Zhang & Chuanxu Wang & Panos M Pardalos, 2021. "Co-evolutionary game of manufacturers’ abatement behavior under carbon tax-subsidy policy [Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is better response to global warming than cap and trade]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 1217-1228.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:1217-1228.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctaa081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bansal, Sangeeta, 2008. "Choice and design of regulatory instruments in the presence of green consumers," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 345-368, August.
    2. Raufer, Roger & Li, Shaoyi, 2009. "Emissions trading in China: A conceptual ‘leapfrog’ approach?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 904-912.
    3. Bansal, Sangeeta & Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis, 2003. "Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 333-355, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maccarrone, Giovanni & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2023. "Shop Until You Drop: the Unexpected Effects of Anticonsumerism and Environmentalism," FEEM Working Papers 330384, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    2. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    3. Doni, Nicola & Ricchiuti, Giorgio, 2013. "Market equilibrium in the presence of green consumers and responsible firms: A comparative statics analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 380-395.
    4. Corinne Langinier & Amrita Ray Chaudhuri, 2020. "Green Technology and Patents in the Presence of Green Consumers," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(1), pages 73-101.
    5. Marco A. Marini & Ornella Tarola & Jacques-François Thisse, 2020. "Is Environmentalism the Right Strategy to Decarbonize the World?," Working Papers 2020.31, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Yoshinori Wada, 2019. "Discriminatory tax and subsidy on environmental behaviors," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(1), pages 25-36, January.
    7. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.
    8. Sangeeta Bansal, "undated". "Market Provision of Quality: Impact of Economic Growth," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 12-03, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    9. Toshimitsu, Tsuyoshi, 2010. "On the paradoxical case of a consumer-based environmental subsidy policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 159-164, January.
    10. Christos Constantatos & Christos Pargianas & Eftichios S. Sartzetakis, 2021. "Green consumers and environmental policy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(1), pages 105-140, February.
    11. Ourania Karakosta, 2018. "Tax Competition in Vertically Differentiated Markets with Environmentally Conscious Consumers," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(4), pages 693-711, April.
    12. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Isamu Matsukawa, 2012. "The Welfare Effects of Environmental Taxation on a Green Market Where Consumers Emit a Pollutant," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 52(1), pages 87-107, May.
    14. Alexander Haupt & Magdalena Stadejek, 2010. "The Choice of Environmental Policy Instruments: Energy Efficiency and Redistribution," CESifo Working Paper Series 2986, CESifo.
    15. Brzeskot, Magdalena & Haupt, Alexander, 2013. "Environmental policy and the energy efficiency of vertically differentiated consumer products," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 444-453.
    16. Burani, Nadia & Mantovani, Andrea, 2024. "Environmental policies with green network effect and price discrimination," TSE Working Papers 24-1513, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    17. Wenjun Sun & Naoto Jinji, 2014. "The Effects of Emission Taxes on Pollution through the Diffusion of Clean Technology:The Presence of Green Consumers," Discussion papers e-14-014, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    18. Giulia Ceccantoni & Ornella Tarola & Cecilia Vergari, 2022. "Tax and pollution in a vertically differentiated duopoly: when consumers matter," Working Papers 3/22, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    19. Charu Grover & Sangeeta Bansal, 2021. "Effect of green network and emission tax on consumer choice under discrete continuous framework," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 641-666, October.
    20. H. Eggert & M. Greaker, 2011. "Trade, GMOs and Environmental Risk: Are Current Policies Likely to Improve Welfare?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(4), pages 587-608, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:1217-1228.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.