IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v34y2025i1p489-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Insights On Why Romania Should Be Downgraded To Junk Status In 2025

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian NEGREA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Adriana GIURGIU

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Ciprian Beniamin BENEA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

In 2025, Romania’s potential downgrade to junk status could be driven by a combination of worsening fiscal health, political instability, economic slowdown, and external challenges. A downgrade would likely reflect a loss of confidence in the country’s ability to maintain economic stability, service its debt, and attract investment. However, such a scenario would likely be preceded by warning signals, such as increased debt levels, budget deficits, economic contraction, or growing political unrest. Downgrading a country's credit rating to «junk» status is a serious financial move and would typically be based on a range of economic, fiscal, and political factors. If Romania were to face such a downgrade in 2025, the reasons could stem from several issues. Rising government debt level, which is today almost 54% of the GDP, it could become a concern for investors, especially if the country struggles to meet its debt obligations or service the debt. The 7% annual budget deficit negotiated with the European Commission could be in peril and if it increases, it could create uncertainty around the ability to manage public finances effectively. The fail to enact sufficient reforms to stabilize Romania’s finances combined with a lack of political will to implement harsh fiscal consolidation measures could lead to a downgrade. If the economy slows down significantly or enters a recession, it could raise doubts about the country’s future economic prospects, and the USA tariffs are a big push in that direction, hitting the country traditional European trade partners, due to the fact that more than 70% of goods and services are traded with the EU. Due to these factors, the paper addresses the possibility of a downgrade to JUNK status for the Romanian economy, and what the economic impact should be, plus the necessary measures that have to be addressed in order to put the economy back on track. The paper will analyze statistical data from Eurostat, UNCTAD statistical data base, and TradingEconomics in order to assess the impact and possible measures in comparison the what Greece and Argentina did in order to improve their countries rating. Romania doesn’t have to invent the weal; it can learn from other countries best case scenarios and the good case measures that those economies have taken. Despite some credit agencies downgrade, the Romanian economy has the potential to recover quickly, supported by strong domestic measures, resilient growth sectors, and a proactive governmental approach to economic stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian NEGREA & Adriana GIURGIU & Ciprian Beniamin BENEA, 2025. "Some Insights On Why Romania Should Be Downgraded To Junk Status In 2025," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 489-499, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:489-499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Adrian-NEGREA-Adriana-GIURGIU-Ciprian-Beniamin-BENEA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:489-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.