IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v34y2025i1p489-499.html

Some Insights On Why Romania Should Be Downgraded To Junk Status In 2025

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian NEGREA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Adriana GIURGIU

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Ciprian Beniamin BENEA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

In 2025, Romania’s potential downgrade to junk status could be driven by a combination of worsening fiscal health, political instability, economic slowdown, and external challenges. A downgrade would likely reflect a loss of confidence in the country’s ability to maintain economic stability, service its debt, and attract investment. However, such a scenario would likely be preceded by warning signals, such as increased debt levels, budget deficits, economic contraction, or growing political unrest. Downgrading a country's credit rating to «junk» status is a serious financial move and would typically be based on a range of economic, fiscal, and political factors. If Romania were to face such a downgrade in 2025, the reasons could stem from several issues. Rising government debt level, which is today almost 54% of the GDP, it could become a concern for investors, especially if the country struggles to meet its debt obligations or service the debt. The 7% annual budget deficit negotiated with the European Commission could be in peril and if it increases, it could create uncertainty around the ability to manage public finances effectively. The fail to enact sufficient reforms to stabilize Romania’s finances combined with a lack of political will to implement harsh fiscal consolidation measures could lead to a downgrade. If the economy slows down significantly or enters a recession, it could raise doubts about the country’s future economic prospects, and the USA tariffs are a big push in that direction, hitting the country traditional European trade partners, due to the fact that more than 70% of goods and services are traded with the EU. Due to these factors, the paper addresses the possibility of a downgrade to JUNK status for the Romanian economy, and what the economic impact should be, plus the necessary measures that have to be addressed in order to put the economy back on track. The paper will analyze statistical data from Eurostat, UNCTAD statistical data base, and TradingEconomics in order to assess the impact and possible measures in comparison the what Greece and Argentina did in order to improve their countries rating. Romania doesn’t have to invent the weal; it can learn from other countries best case scenarios and the good case measures that those economies have taken. Despite some credit agencies downgrade, the Romanian economy has the potential to recover quickly, supported by strong domestic measures, resilient growth sectors, and a proactive governmental approach to economic stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian NEGREA & Adriana GIURGIU & Ciprian Beniamin BENEA, 2025. "Some Insights On Why Romania Should Be Downgraded To Junk Status In 2025," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 489-499, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:489-499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Adrian-NEGREA-Adriana-GIURGIU-Ciprian-Beniamin-BENEA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afonso, António & Furceri, Davide & Gomes, Pedro, 2012. "Sovereign credit ratings and financial markets linkages: Application to European data," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 606-638.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Liu & BRUCE MORLEY, 2013. "Sovereign Credit Ratings, The Macroeconomy And Credit Default Swap Spreads," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 56(3-4), pages 335-348.
    2. Polito, Vito & Wickens, Michael, 2015. "Sovereign credit ratings in the European Union: A model-based fiscal analysis," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 220-247.
    3. Kinateder, Harald & Wagner, Niklas, 2017. "Quantitative easing and the pricing of EMU sovereign debt," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Afonso, António & Gomes, Pedro & Taamouti, Abderrahim, 2014. "Sovereign credit ratings, market volatility, and financial gains," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 20-33.
    5. Baker, Jessica & Carreras, Oriol & Kirby, Simon & Meaning, Jack & Piggott, Rebecca, 2016. "Modelling events: The short-term economic impact of leaving the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 339-350.
    6. Sahibzada, Irfan Ullah, 2023. "To what extent do sovereign rating actions affect global equity market sectors?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 240-261.
    7. Ho, Amy Yueh-Fang & Liang, Hsin-Yu & Jian, Jhih-Shan, 2023. "How does national culture affect the spillover effects of sovereign ratings on corporate ratings?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 671-691.
    8. Mink, Mark & de Haan, Jakob, 2013. "Contagion during the Greek sovereign debt crisis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 102-113.
    9. J. Alsubaiei, Bader & Calice, Giovanni & Vivian, Andrew, 2021. "Sovereign CDS and mutual funds: Global evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Binici, Mahir & Hutchison, Michael & Miao, Evan Weicheng, 2020. "Market price effects of agency sovereign debt announcements: Importance of prior credit states," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 769-787.
    11. Ehrmann, Michael & Osbat, Chiara & Stráský, Jan & Uusküla, Lenno, 2014. "The euro exchange rate during the European sovereign debt crisis – Dancing to its own tune?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(PB), pages 319-339.
    12. Deena Zaidi, 2015. "Eurozone Debt Crisis and Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies," Global Credit Review (GCR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(01), pages 99-111.
    13. Chien-Lung Hsu & Chun-Hao Chiang, 2015. "The financial crisis research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 161-177, October.
    14. Gwion Williams & Rasha Alsakka & Owain ap Gwilym, 2013. "The Impact of Sovereign Credit Signals on Bank Share Prices during the European Sovereign Debt Crisis," Working Papers 13007, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    15. Alsakka, Rasha & ap Gwilym, Owain, 2013. "Rating agencies’ signals during the European sovereign debt crisis: Market impact and spillovers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 144-162.
    16. Patrycja Klusak & Matthew Agarwala & Matt Burke & Moritz Kraemer & Kamiar Mohaddes, 2023. "Rising Temperatures, Falling Ratings: The Effect of Climate Change on Sovereign Creditworthiness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7468-7491, December.
    17. Erdem, Orhan & Varli, Yusuf, 2014. "Understanding the sovereign credit ratings of emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 42-57.
    18. Bustillo, Inés & Perrotti, Daniel & Velloso, Helvia, 2019. "Sovereign credit ratings in Latin America and the Caribbean: history and impact on bond spreads," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123197, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Susanna Saroyan & Lilit Popoyan, 2017. "Bank-sovereign ties against interbank market integration: the case of the Italian segment," LEM Papers Series 2017/02, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Jinho Choi & Alexander den Ruijter & Kimi Xu Jiang & Edmund Moshammer, 2022. "Japan’s sovereign rating in the post-pandemic era," Working Papers 52, European Stability Mechanism.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:489-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.