IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i1p767-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Learning, Quality And Innovation - Evidence From Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Botezat Elena-Aurelia

    (University of Oradea)

  • Tomescu Ada Mirela

    (University of Oradea)

Abstract

Organizational learning is a new management paradigm and is defined as the collective capability based on experiential and cognitive processes. This study considers organizational learning as a multidisciplinary and complex process, involving four dimensions: managerial commitment; systems perspective; openness and experimentation; and knowledge transfer and integration. Companies working in the footwear and clothing industry must face and meet increased quality requirements, must be flexible to the needs of different market segments, move quickly in the direction of meeting customers the needs, and must provide a user-friendly interface. The current requirements of organizational learning (related to quality management) consider a new way of thinking, centred on providing more comfort and convenience. Organizational learning has an important role in innovation as it stimulates creativity, supports gaining new knowledge, increases the potential of understanding, and stimulates the desire to put new ideas into practice. Product innovation, as well as, the innovation process is based on a deep understanding of consumer needs, of the actions of competitors, and of the technological development. It is possible, only, through the commitment of the management. Organizational learning has the potential to explore and, therewith, capitalize on the available knowledge in an organization. Moreover, organizational learning often involves an implicit knowledge and the actions involving dexterity are often based on such kind of knowledge that with time creates organizational routines. Since this study is an exploratory one, we chose the interview method, method that belongs to qualitative research. The purpose of this study was to assess the mechanisms of organizational learning and their relation to quality and innovation. The results of our research confirm once more that Romanian companies are preoccupied by profit rather than performance, by productivity and not creativity, of compliance and not innovation. We can say that the concern for quality management and innovation aimed at organizational learning is driven by necessity rather than opportunity. Communities of practice (the apprenticeship system), compared with any other learning solutions proposed by the theory and practice of management, have the advantage of being operated with good results in the area of Bihor. The findings of the present study allow us to suggest that the revival of communities of practice is a solution to revitalising organizational learning in the manufacturing industry companies. Our future research efforts will be directed to this organizational solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Botezat Elena-Aurelia & Tomescu Ada Mirela, 2017. "Organizational Learning, Quality And Innovation - Evidence From Manufacturing Industry," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 767-772, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:767-772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/77.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerez-Gomez, Pilar & Cespedes-Lorente, Jose & Valle-Cabrera, Ramon, 2005. "Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 715-725, June.
    2. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    3. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    4. Goh, Swee & Richards, Gregory, 1997. "Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Algarni, Mohammad A. & Ali, Murad & Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. & Albort-Morant, Gema, 2023. "The differential effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity on imitation and innovation strategies, and its impact on sustained competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Rangus, Kaja & Slavec, Alenka, 2017. "The interplay of decentralization, employee involvement and absorptive capacity on firms' innovation and business performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 195-203.
    3. Diego R. Toubes & Noelia Araújo-Vila & José A. Fraiz-Brea, 2021. "Organizational Learning Capacity and Sustainability Challenges in Times of Crisis: A Study on Tourism SMEs in Galicia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Barasa, Laura & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, Patrick & Kimuyu, Peter & Kinyanjui, Bethuel, 2017. "Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 280-291.
    5. Joaquín Camps & Antonio Majocchi, 2010. "Learning Atmosphere and Ethical Behavior, Does It Make Sense?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 129-147, June.
    6. Joaquín García-Cruz & Juan Carlos Real, 2012. "Trust as a consequence of perceived commitment: Implications on organizational learning capability and product innovation," Working Papers 12.03, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Organization and Marketing (former Department of Business Administration).
    7. Cetrulo, Armanda & Cirillo, Valeria & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Organized Labour and R&D: Evidence from Italy," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1195, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    8. repec:thr:techub:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Gallego-Nicholls, José Fernando & Guijarro-García, María, 2021. "A recipe for success: Crowdsourcing, online social networks, and their impact on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Chee‐Yang Fong & Keng‐Boon Ooi & Boon‐In Tan & Voon‐Hsien Lee & Alain Yee‐Loong Chong, 2011. "HRM practices and knowledge sharing: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(5/6), pages 704-723, August.
    11. Nguyen, Bang & Yu, Xiaoyu & Melewar, T.C. & Gupta, Suraksha, 2016. "Critical brand innovation factors (CBIF): Understanding innovation and market performance in the Chinese high-tech service industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2471-2479.
    12. Fu, Xiaolan & Hou, Jun & Liu, Xiaohui, 2018. "Unpacking the Relationship between Outward Direct Investment and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese firms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 111-123.
    13. Eftychia Kessopoulou & Katerina Gotzamani & Styliani Xanthopoulou & George Tsiotras, 2023. "Conceptualizing and Validating a Model for Benchlearning Capability: Results from the Greek Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Gomes, Giancarlo & Seman, Laio Oriel & De Montreuil Carmona, Linda Jessica, 2022. "Industry does matter: Analysing innovation, firm performance and organisational learning heterogeneities on Brazilian manufacturing sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 544-555.
    15. Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa & Javier Martínez-Falcó, 2022. "Driving Innovation by Managing Entrepreneurial Orientation, Cooperation and Learning for the Sustainability of Companies in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Jorge Ferreira & Sofia Cardim & Arnaldo Coelho, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 620-644, June.
    17. Nofal Razan Jamil & Bader Obeidat, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability on the Effect of Transformational Leadership on Entrepreneurial Orientation," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 7(2), pages 111-136, April.
    18. Alexandra Luciana GUTA, 2018. "Organizational Learning Capability. Model Testing In Universities," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 229-240, September.
    19. Feng, Cong & Fay, Scott, 2020. "Store Closings and Retailer Profitability: A Contingency Perspective," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 411-433.
    20. Dhir, Sanjay & Ongsakul, Viput & Ahmed, Zafar U. & Rajan, Rishabh, 2020. "Integration of knowledge and enhancing competitiveness: A case of acquisition of Zain by Bharti Airtel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 674-684.
    21. Muhammad Zeeshan Younas, 2023. "Regional institutional quality and firm-level innovation: a case of selected south asian economies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 615-643, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational learning; quality; innovation; community of practice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:767-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.