IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i5p575-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Goh, Swee
  • Richards, Gregory

Abstract

Implementation of organizational learning is complicated by the lack of a systematic approach that includes the measurement of learning capability. We propose that by identifying and measuring the essential organizational characteristics and management practices that promote organizational learning, one could develop a benchmark of learning capability that would enable managers to design interventions to overcome specific barriers in building a learning organization. Based upon a review of the literature, we developed an Organizational Learning Survey (OLS) to measure learning capability. Our research with five different organizations indicates that the OLS does discriminate between organizations on those characteristics important to learning. We also discuss the implications of using such an approach for intervention and change in building more effective learning organizations. The paper also discusses other perspectives of organizational learning, some of the limitations of the OLS measurement scale and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Goh, Swee & Richards, Gregory, 1997. "Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:5:p:575-583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237397000364
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:5:p:575-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.