IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The issue of statistical power for overall model fit in evaluating structural equation models

Listed author(s):
  • Richard HERMIDA

    ()

    (George Mason University, 3575 Owasso Street, Shoreview, MN, USA, 55126)

  • Joseph N. LUCHMAN

    ()

    (George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, USA, 22030)

  • Vias NICOLAIDES

    ()

    (George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, USA, 22030)

  • Cristina WILCOX

    ()

    (George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, USA, 22030)

Registered author(s):

    Statistical power is an important concept for psychological research. However, examining the power of a structural equation model (SEM) is rare in practice. This article provides an accessible review of the concept of statistical power for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) index of overall model fit in structural equation modeling. By way of example, we examine the current state of power in the literature by reviewing studies in top Industrial - Organizational (I/O) Psychology journals using SEMs. Results indicate that in many studies, power is very low, which implies acceptance of invalid models. Additionally, we examined methodological situations which may have an influence on statistical power of SEMs. Results showed that power varies significantly as a function of model type and whether or not the model is the main model for the study. Finally, results indicated that power is significantly related to model fit statistics used in evaluating SEMs. The results from this quantitative review imply that researchers should be more vigilant with respect to power in structural equation modeling. We therefore conclude by offering methodological best practices to increase confidence in the interpretation of structural equation modeling results with respect to statistical power issues.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://cmss.univnt.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_III_issue_1/CMSS_vol_III_issue_1_art.003.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences in its journal Computational Methods in Social Sciences (CMSS).

    Volume (Year): 3 (2015)
    Issue (Month): 1 (June)
    Pages: 25-42

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ntu:ntcmss:vol3-iss1-15-025
    Contact details of provider: Phone: +040.21.330.90.32
    Fax: +040.21.330.86.08
    Web page: http://www.univnt.ro/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. McQuitty, Shaun, 2004. "Statistical power and structural equation models in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 175-183, February.
    2. Le, Huy & Schmidt, Frank L. & Harter, James K. & Lauver, Kristy J., 2010. "The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 112-125, July.
    3. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1987. "Practical Issues in Structural Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 78-117, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntu:ntcmss:vol3-iss1-15-025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stefan Ciucu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.