IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2025i67p191-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waves of commercial activity in Russia over the last millenn ium and evolution of entrepreneurship and its economic role

Author

Listed:
  • Zemtsov, S.

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Development economics research laboratory, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Imperception of general long-term economic patterns can lead to economic policy failures. Based on the review of scientific works since the 18th century and the analysis of archival data, the article proposes an approach to studying the evolutionary dynamics of commercial (business-like) activity based on assessing changes in the density of cities and small businesses. Five irregular spatio-temporal waves were discovered on the territory of modern Russia over the previous ten centuries. In the article, commercial activity in cities in the past (crafts, trades etc.) is considered as a primitive form of entrepreneurship. Frontier development of large territories required adventurous and entrepreneurial spirits. Although in Soviet times the dynamics of small enterprise density was asynchronous with the rates of economic growth, in general over the last century and half a positive relationship was observed between them, including that at the regional level in the new century. Many of the identified patterns were proved to be historically consistent: 1) entrepreneurship can be considered a persistent phenomenon, in particular, the density of small businesses exceeded pre-Soviet assessments, taking into account inaccuracy of data and evolution of economic agents; 2) the spread of entrepreneurship in space was according to the models of innovation diffusion: in particular, we distinguished relatively stable leading regions (cores), such as Moscow, St. Petersburg and the South of the Far East, and lagging ones (periphery); 3) at each stage, the long-term influence of several significant factors of business activity was revealed, such as geographical features of a territory, transport routes, socio-cultural conditions, institutional transformations (reforms), accumulation of human capital in cities and technological changes. Continuing the centuries-old scientific discussion on strategies to promote business activity, it is proposed to influence the characteristics identified above. It is essential to avoid situations of excessive monopolization of the economy and / or growth of the informal sector, since the weakening of one of the production factors (entrepreneurial capital) will have long-term negative effects for economic development. Thus, the restriction of entrepreneurial initiatives led to a decrease in the efficiency of the national economy and weakened the possibilities for its transformation in the late Soviet period; underestimation of the need to accumulate experience and root entrepreneurship intensified negative economic trends after accelerated liberalization in the 1990s. The beginning of the sixth wave will be likely associated with the spread of the digital economy and requires stimulation of online entrepreneurship amid further depopulation. The set of studies of the cyclical dynamics of social processes can be supplemented with a new parameter - business activity, but further cliometric studies are required, as well as verification for other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zemtsov, S., 2025. "Waves of commercial activity in Russia over the last millenn ium and evolution of entrepreneurship and its economic role," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 191-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:67:p:191-223
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2025_2_191-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2025-67-191-223r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2025_2_191-223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audretsch, David B. & Lehmann, Erik E., 2005. "Does the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship hold for regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1191-1202, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giancarlo Giudici & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2019. "The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 815-830, April.
    2. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    3. Mikaela Backman & Charlie Karlsson, 2016. "Determinants of self-employment among commuters and non-commuters," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 755-774, November.
    4. Mark J. O. Bagley, 2019. "Networks, geography and the survival of the firm," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1173-1209, September.
    5. Andrews, RJ & Fazio, Catherine & Guzman, Jorge & Liu, Yupeng & Stern, Scott, 2022. "The Startup Cartography Project: Measuring and mapping entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    6. Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI & Qiuhan ZHAO, 2023. "University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation," Discussion papers 23027, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Chengguang Li & Rodrigo Isidor & Luis Alfonso Dau & Rudy Kabst, 2018. "The More the Merrier? Immigrant Share and Entrepreneurial Activities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(5), pages 698-733, September.
    8. Sam Tavassoli & Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol & Pia Arenius, 2023. "Colocation of Entrepreneurs and New Firm Survival: Role of New Firm Founder’s Experiential Relatedness to Local Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1421-1459, July.
    9. Muhammad Naveed Iftikhar & Maha Ahmad & David B. Audretsch, 0. "The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: the developing country context," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    10. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    11. Haifeng Qian, 2013. "Diversity Versus Tolerance: The Social Drivers of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2718-2735, October.
    12. Julie Ann Elston & Alois Weidinger, 2019. "Entrepreneurial intention and regional internationalization in China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1001-1015, December.
    13. Florencia Garcia-Vicente & Daniel Garcia-Swartz & Martin Campbell-Kelly, 2017. "Information technology clusters and regional growth in America, 1970–1980," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1021-1046, April.
    14. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2006. "Innovation and Peripherality: A Comparative Study in Six EU Member Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p295, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Kim, Younghwan & Kim, Wonjoon & Yang, Taeyong, 2012. "The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 154-166.
    16. Elsie Harper-Anderson & David A. Lewis, 2018. "What Makes Business Incubation Work? Measuring the Influence of Incubator Quality and Regional Capacity on Incubator Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(1), pages 60-77, February.
    17. Karol J. Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2017. "Digitization of heritage collections as indicator of innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 227-246, April.
    18. João J. M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 181-205, February.
    19. Alfredo Monte & Luca Pennacchio, 2020. "Historical roots of regional entrepreneurship: the role of knowledge and creativity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Lleo, María & Cervello, Roberto, 2017. "The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 73-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N1 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations
    • N90 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • B0 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:67:p:191-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.