IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61485-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific literature on carbon dioxide removal revealed as much larger through AI-enhanced systematic mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Lück

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)

  • Max Callaghan

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)

  • Malgorzata Borchers

    (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ))

  • Annette Cowie

    (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development / University of New England)

  • Sabine Fuss

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

  • Matthew Gidden

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
    Climate Analytics
    University of Maryland)

  • Jens Hartmann

    (University Hamburg)

  • Claudia Kammann

    (Hochschule Geisenheim University)

  • David P. Keller

    (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel)

  • Florian Kraxner

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))

  • William F. Lamb

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    University of Leeds)

  • Niall Dowell

    (Imperial College London)

  • Finn Müller-Hansen

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)

  • Gregory F. Nemet

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Benedict S. Probst

    (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
    University of Cambridge
    ETH Zurich)

  • Phil Renforth

    (Heriot-Watt University)

  • Tim Repke

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    University College London)

  • Wilfried Rickels

    (Kiel Institute for the World Economy)

  • Ingrid Schulte

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)

  • Pete Smith

    (University of Aberdeen)

  • Stephen M. Smith

    (University of Oxford)

  • Daniela Thrän

    (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ))

  • Tiffany G. Troxler

    (Department of Earth and Environment and Institute of Environment)

  • Volker Sick

    (University of Michigan)

  • Mijndert Spek

    (Heriot-Watt University)

  • Jan C. Minx

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    University of Leeds)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removal plays an important role in any strategy to limit global warming to well below 2 °C. Keeping abreast with the scientific evidence using rigorous evidence synthesis methods is an important prerequisite for sustainably scaling these methods. Here, we use artificial intelligence to provide a comprehensive systematic map of carbon dioxide removal research. We find a total of 28,976 studies on carbon dioxide removal—3–4 times more than previously suggested. Growth in research is faster than for the field of climate change research as a whole, but very concentrated in specific areas—such as biochar, certain research methods like lab and field experiments, and particular regions like China. Patterns of carbon dioxide removal research contrast with trends in patenting and deployment, highlighting the differing development stages of these technologies. As carbon dioxide removal gains importance for the Paris climate goals, our systematic map can support rigorous evidence synthesis for the IPCC and other assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Lück & Max Callaghan & Malgorzata Borchers & Annette Cowie & Sabine Fuss & Matthew Gidden & Jens Hartmann & Claudia Kammann & David P. Keller & Florian Kraxner & William F. Lamb & Niall Dowell &, 2025. "Scientific literature on carbon dioxide removal revealed as much larger through AI-enhanced systematic mapping," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61485-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61485-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61485-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-61485-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neal R. Haddaway & Max W. Callaghan & Alexandra M. Collins & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & James Thomas & Denny John, 2020. "On the use of computer‐assistance to facilitate systematic mapping," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    2. Lea Berrang‐Ford & Friederike Döbbe & Ruth Garside & Neal Haddaway & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Vivian Welch & Howard White, 2020. "Editorial: Evidence synthesis for accelerated learning on climate solutions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    3. Gunnar Luderer & Zoi Vrontisi & Christoph Bertram & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Robert C. Pietzcker & Joeri Rogelj & Harmen Sytze Boer & Laurent Drouet & Johannes Emmerling & Oliver Fricko & Shinichiro Fu, 2018. "Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 626-633, July.
    4. Max W. Callaghan & Jan C. Minx & Piers M. Forster, 2020. "A topography of climate change research," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(2), pages 118-123, February.
    5. Max Callaghan & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Shruti Nath & Quentin Lejeune & Thomas R. Knutson & Markus Reichstein & Gerrit Hansen & Emily Theokritoff & Marina Andrijevic & Robert J. Brecha & Michael , 2021. "Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(11), pages 966-972, November.
    6. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Gaurav Ganti & Quentin Lejeune & Biqing Zhu & Peter Pfleiderer & Ruben Prütz & Philippe Ciais & Thomas L. Frölicher & Sabine Fuss & Thomas Gasser & Matthew J. Gidden & Cha, 2024. "Overconfidence in climate overshoot," Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8033), pages 366-373, October.
    7. Rob Bellamy, 2018. "Incentivize negative emissions responsibly," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 532-534, July.
    8. Emily Cox & Neil Robert Edwards, 2019. "Beyond carbon pricing: policy levers for negative emissions technologies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1144-1156, October.
    9. Sabine Fuss & Josep G. Canadell & Glen P. Peters & Massimo Tavoni & Robbie M. Andrew & Philippe Ciais & Robert B. Jackson & Chris D. Jones & Florian Kraxner & Nebosja Nakicenovic & Corinne Le Quéré & , 2014. "Betting on negative emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 850-853, October.
    10. Kang, Jia-Ning & Zhang, Yun-Long & Chen, Weiming, 2022. "Delivering negative emissions innovation on the right track: A patent analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Holly Jean Buck & Wim Carton & Jens Friis Lund & Nils Markusson, 2023. "Why residual emissions matter right now," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(4), pages 351-358, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shinichiro Fujimori & Tomoko Hasegawa & Volker Krey & Keywan Riahi & Christoph Bertram & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Valentina Bosetti & Jessica Callen & Jacques Després & Jonathan Doelman & Laurent Drou, 2019. "A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(5), pages 386-396, May.
    2. Negri, Valentina & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Fajardy, Mathilde & Reiner, David M. & Mac Dowell, Niall & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Abel, Dennis & Lieth, Jonas & Jünger, Stefan, 2024. "Mapping the spatial turn in social science energy research. A computational literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Paul Wolfram & Stephanie Weber & Kenneth Gillingham & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Michael G. Windisch & Florian Humpenöder & Leon Merfort & Nico Bauer & Gunnar Luderer & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Jens Heinke & Christoph Müller & Gabriel Abrahao & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Alexander Popp, 2025. "Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Sean Low & Livia Fritz & Chad M. Baum & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2024. "Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Florian Leblanc & Ruben Bibas & Silvana Mima & Matteo Muratori & Shogo Sakamoto & Fuminori Sano & Nico Bauer & Vassilis Daioglou & Shinichiro Fujimori & Matthew J. Gidden & Estsushi Kato & Steven K. R, 2022. "The contribution of bioenergy to the decarbonization of transport: a multi-model assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Bryan K. Mignone & Leon Clarke & James A. Edmonds & Angelo Gurgel & Howard J. Herzog & Jeremiah X. Johnson & Dharik S. Mallapragada & Haewon McJeon & Jennifer Morris & Patrick R. O’Rourke & Sergey Pal, 2024. "Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Viola Becattini & Paolo Gabrielli & Linda Frattini & David Weisbach & Marco Mazzotti, 2022. "A two-step carbon pricing scheme enabling a net-zero and net-negative CO $$_2$$ 2 -emissions world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Clara Bachorz & Philipp C. Verpoort & Gunnar Luderer & Falko Ueckerdt, 2025. "Exploring techno-economic landscapes of abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    12. Heleen L. Soest & Lara Aleluia Reis & Luiz Bernardo Baptista & Christoph Bertram & Jacques Després & Laurent Drouet & Michel Elzen & Panagiotis Fragkos & Oliver Fricko & Shinichiro Fujimori & Neil Gra, 2022. "Author Correction: Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, December.
    13. Lea Berrang‐Ford & Friederike Döbbe & Ruth Garside & Neal Haddaway & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Vivian Welch & Howard White, 2020. "Editorial: Evidence synthesis for accelerated learning on climate solutions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    14. Coppens, Léo & Venmans, Frank, 2025. "The welfare properties of climate targets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Neal R. Haddaway & Max W. Callaghan & Alexandra M. Collins & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & James Thomas & Denny John, 2020. "On the use of computer‐assistance to facilitate systematic mapping," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    16. Frischmuth, Felix & Härtel, Philipp, 2022. "Hydrogen sourcing strategies and cross-sectoral flexibility trade-offs in net-neutral energy scenarios for Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    17. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    18. Ángel Galán-Martín & Daniel Vázquez & Selene Cobo & Niall Dowell & José Antonio Caballero & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2021. "Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Kimon Keramidas & Silvana Mima & Adrien Bidaud, 2024. "Opportunities and roadblocks in the decarbonisation of the global steel sector: A demand and production modelling approach," Post-Print hal-04383385, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61485-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.