IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2013061041191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers behaviour of students when shopping for organic food in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Zámková

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Tolstého 16, 586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic
    Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Prokop

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Tolstého 16, 586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Organic farming and organic food are terms that attract the attention of not only farmers, but also economists. It is paper, which could address many consumers in the future. A healthier way of life is becoming more and more popular.This paper primarily aims to collect basic knowledge of organic farming, organic food and its labelling. Furthermore, according to conducted marketing research (1.289 respondents were addressed in questionnaire survey), it is aim to characterize the factors that influence respondents when buying organic food. Based on the results of research another goal is to identify the main factors that could make the younger generation of Czechs buy organic food more frequently. Then according to the statistical data processing this paper aims to formulate recommendations to producers and traders of organic products to entice young people to become customers of this article for many years. Next goal is to compare the results with some other European countries. Interesting relationship between frequency of organic food purchases and other indicators will be assessed by using analysis of contingency tables. An intention is also to identify the target group for marketing strategies. What the respondents most often link with various organic labelling will be identified by using correspondence analysis of monitored data and better flows of information will be proposed.It is clear from the research that organic food is most often bought by women and respondents with higher level of household life. It is purchased mainly fruit and vegetables, as well as dairy products. Respondents mostly make their purchases of organic food in hypermarkets and supermarkets. In addition to the primary reason of disinterest in buying organic food, which is the price, respondents also don't believe that organic food is better than conventional food and it is not attractive for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Zámková & Martin Prokop, 2013. "Consumers behaviour of students when shopping for organic food in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 1191-1201.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2013061041191
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361041191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201361041191.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201361041191.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201361041191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nenadic, Oleg & Greenacre, Michael, 2007. "Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two- and Three-dimensional Graphics: The ca Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristína Predanocyová & Peter Šedík & Ľubica Kubicová & Elena Horská, 2018. "Consumption and Offer of Organic Food on the Slovak Market," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(5), pages 1315-1323.
    2. Martina Zámková & Stanislav Rojík & Ladislav Pilař & Martina Chalupová & Martin Prokop & Radek Stolín & Paweł Dziekański & Mansoor Maitah, 2021. "Customer Preferences for Organic Agriculture Produce in the Czech Republic: 2016 and 2019," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Balcarová, T. & Pokorná, J. & Pilař, L., 2014. "The Influence of Children on the Parents Buying Behavior: Food Purchase in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Katja Lozar Manfreda & Charalampia Anastasiou & Knut Kalgraff Skjak & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2018. "Mode comparison study on willingness to buy and willingness to pay for organic foods: paper-and-pencil versus computerized questionnaire," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 587-603, September.
    5. Martina Zámková & Martin Prokop, 2014. "Comparison of Consumer Behavior of Slovaks and Czechs in the Market of Organic Products by Using Correspondence Analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 783-795.
    6. Švecová Jana & Odehnalová Pavla, 2019. "The determinants of consumer behaviour of students from Brno when purchasing organic food," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 49-64, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Greenacre, 2012. "Fuzzy coding in constrained ordinations," Economics Working Papers 1325, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Richards, Greg & van der Ark, L. Andries, 2013. "Dimensions of cultural consumption among tourists: Multiple correspondence analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 71-76.
    3. Michael Greenacre, 2008. "Correspondence analysis of raw data," Economics Working Papers 1112, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jul 2009.
    4. M. L. M. Souza & R. R. Bastos & M. D. T. Vieira, 2022. "Calculating weighted scores from a multiple correspondence analysis solution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4841-4854, December.
    5. Greenacre, Michael, 2009. "Power transformations in correspondence analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3107-3116, June.
    6. Gangl, Katharina & Kastlunger, Barbara & Kirchler, Erich & Voracek, Martin, 2012. "Confidence in the economy in times of crisis: Social representations of experts and laypeople," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 603-614.
    7. Martina Zámková & Martin Prokop, 2014. "Comparison of Consumer Behavior of Slovaks and Czechs in the Market of Organic Products by Using Correspondence Analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 783-795.
    8. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    9. Chao Wu & Xiaofang Guo & Jun Zhao & Quan Lv & Hongbin Li & Edward B. McNeil & Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong & Hongning Zhou, 2017. "Behaviors Related to Mosquito-Borne Diseases among Different Ethnic Minority Groups along the China-Laos Border Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Monroy-Gómez-Franco, Luis, 2023. "Shades of social mobility: Colorism, ethnic origin and intergenerational social mobility," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 247-266.
    11. Mier, Mathias & Siala, Kais & Govorukha, Kristina & Mayer, Philip, 2023. "Collaboration, decarbonization, and distributional effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    12. James Flamino & Alessandro Galeazzi & Stuart Feldman & Michael W. Macy & Brendan Cross & Zhenkun Zhou & Matteo Serafino & Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2023. "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 904-916, June.
    13. Luigi Bollani & Alessandro Bonadonna & Giovanni Peira, 2019. "The Millennials’ Concept of Sustainability in the Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Huynh Evertsen, Phuc & Rasmussen, Einar & Nenadic, Oleg, 2022. "Commercializing circular economy innovations: A taxonomy of academic spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Peter Ingwersen & Antonio Eleazar Serrano-López, 2018. "Smart city research 1990–2016," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1205-1236, November.
    16. Natalia Korcz & Emilia Janeczko, 2022. "Forest Education with the Use of Educational Infrastructure in the Opinion of the Public-Experience from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Oliver Wieczorek & Melanie Malzahn, 2024. "Exploring an extinct society through the lens of Habitus-Field theory and the Tocharian text corpus," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Huichen Gao & Shijuan Wang, 2022. "The Intellectual Structure of Research on Rural-to-Urban Migrants: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Júlio Miguel Alvarenga & Cecília Rodrigues Vieira & Leandro Braga Godinho & Pedro Henrique Campelo & James Purser Pitts & Guarino Rinaldi Colli, 2017. "Spatial-temporal dynamics of neotropical velvet ant (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) communities along a forest-savanna gradient," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Michael Greenacre & Paul Lewi, 2009. "Distributional Equivalence and Subcompositional Coherence in the Analysis of Compositional Data, Contingency Tables and Ratio-Scale Measurements," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 26(1), pages 29-54, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2013061041191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.