IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/bmsmti/v11y2020i2p55-78.html

Impact of Bricolage on Organizational Innovation Through Recognition of Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Shoaib Ali
  • Farooq Azam
  • Hafiz Muhammad Naveed
  • Muneeba Qayyum
  • Naveed Ahmed

Abstract

Although several studies have presented bricolage as a method in the context of new projects to address resource limitations, none have specifically explored the effects of bricolage to find potential on organizational innovation prospects within the context of recognition of opportunity. The purpose of this research is to identify how the bricolage effect on organization innovation through the recognition of opportunities. The prior study was adopted a causal and comparative design of a quantitative approach while a cross-sectional survey technique is determined to gather data by questionnaire. A simple random sampling technique is adopted to select 242 employees of various Chinese organizations who are working in Pakistan. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and simple linear regression is regressed to analyze the data through inferential statistical techniques. The results of the study showed there is no substantial change of bricolage on organizational innovation by recognition of opportunities based on the number of staff, year of initiation, and position of the employee. However, it is suggested that organizations should hold training and conferences to raise awareness among workers about the recognition of opportunities and their benefits. This study could be useful to decision-makers, Chinese, and resident investors who plan to invest in Pakistan. Investors can take benefit from understanding the local economy and organization innovation by recognition of opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoaib Ali & Farooq Azam & Hafiz Muhammad Naveed & Muneeba Qayyum & Naveed Ahmed, 2020. "Impact of Bricolage on Organizational Innovation Through Recognition of Opportunities," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 55-78, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:55-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/17739/13707
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/17739
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Arentz & Frederic Sautet & Virgil Storr, 2013. "Prior-knowledge and opportunity identification," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 461-478, August.
    2. MariaLaura Di Domenico & Helen Haugh & Paul Tracey, 2010. "Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 681-703, July.
    3. Scott Shane, 2000. "Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 448-469, August.
    4. Zahra, Shaker A., 1993. "Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 319-340, July.
    5. Daphne W Yiu & ChungMing Lau & Garry D Bruton, 2007. "International venturing by emerging economy firms: the effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(4), pages 519-540, July.
    6. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    7. Danny Miller, 1987. "The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 55-76, January.
    8. Ho Chea Hooi & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Azlan Amran & Syed Abidur Rahman, 2016. "The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(12), pages 1616-1638, December.
    9. Geoffrey Desa, 2012. "Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 727-751, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reypens, Lina & Bacq, Sophie & Milanov, Hana, 2021. "Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    2. Mengmeng Meng & Jiasu Lei & Jie Jiao & Qiuyan Tao, 2020. "How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Jing Xia & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Guodong Li & Chien-Chi Chu & Kai Wang, 2018. "A System Dynamics Framework for Academic Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Veronica, Scuotto & Alexeis, Garcia-Perez & Valentina, Cillo & Elisa, Giacosa, 2020. "Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 131-141.
    5. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    6. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    7. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Mantok, Stanzin, 2021. "Mitigating the tension in pursuit of operational ambidexterity: The roles of knowledge development and bricolage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    9. Petra Andries & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2014. "Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 21-38, June.
    10. Rodrigo-Alarcón, Job & García-Villaverde, Pedro M. & Ruiz-Ortega, María J. & Parra-Requena, Gloria, 2018. "From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-209.
    11. Pamela Adams & Roberto Fontana & Franco Malerba, 2022. "Knowledge resources and the acquisition of spinouts," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(2), pages 277-313, June.
    12. Maria Glinyanova & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Victor Tiberius & Antonio C. Cuenca Ballester, 2021. "Five decades of corporate entrepreneurship research: measuring and mapping the field," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1731-1757, December.
    13. Xiaoyu Yu & Yajie Li & Zhongfeng Su & Yida Tao & Bang Nguyen & Fan Xia, 2020. "Entrepreneurial bricolage and its effects on new venture growth and adaptiveness in an emerging economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1141-1163, December.
    14. Svante Andersson & Natasha Evers, 2015. "International opportunity recognition in international new ventures—a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 260-276, September.
    15. Rui Baptista & Murat Karaöz & João Correia Leitão, 2020. "Diversification by young, small firms: the role of pre-entry resources and entry mistakes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-122, June.
    16. Maref M. F. Alokshe & Muri Wole Adedokun & Kolawole Iyiola, 2025. "Advanced manufacturing technologies, strategic agility, business network and sustained competitive performance: an empirical evidence from an emerging economy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Chase, Sarah R. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2025. "Waves and rips: Abalone, entrepreneurial variants, and community functioning," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4).
    18. Babita Bhati & Rashmi Maini & Raj K. Kovid & Ashwani Mohan, 2025. "Unveiling the moderating effect of environmental turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial competencies: a study from Indian SMEs," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(3), pages 1301-1312, March.
    19. Jianyu Zhao & Yining Huang & Xi Xi & Shanshan Wang, 2021. "How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 889-919, June.
    20. Jason P. Davis & Vikas A. Aggarwal, 2020. "Knowledge mobilization in the face of imitation: Microfoundations of knowledge aggregation and firm‐level innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 1983-2014, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:55-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.