IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ajfa88/v9y2017i2p330351.html

Do Firms' Characteristics Make a Difference of the Choice of Capital Budgeting Practices? Evidence from Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Lingesiya Kengatharan

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the differences of the choice of capital budgeting practices in terms of firms’ characteristics of Sri Lankan companies. The primary data were garnered from 186 financial officers using self-administered questionnaires. Collected data were then analysed using independent sample t- test. The Results of the study revealed that the use of simple capital budgeting practices were mostly preferred by small sized firms and mainly managed by finance professionals with non-MBA educational qualifications and short tenure. Sophisticated and advanced capital budgeting practices were used mostly by large firms; and were mainly managed by finance professionals with master of business administration qualification and long tenure. According to the industry differences, accounting rate of return was primarily applied by non-MBA qualified financial officers and was also preferred by non-manufacturing firms. None of the other methods made any significant differences in terms of type of industry. Sophisticated capital budgeting practices were determined by the size of the capital budget, advanced capital budgeting practices were determined by both the size of the capital budget and the educational qualifications of the finance professionals. In a similar vein, simple capital budgeting practices were determined by the size of the capital budget, the educational qualifications of the financial officers, and type of industry. Overall, this study has made parametric contributions to the choice of capital budgeting practices in terms of firms’ characteristics of Sri Lankan companies. The findings of the study are useful to the investment decision makers when they are appraising investment projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingesiya Kengatharan, 2017. "Do Firms' Characteristics Make a Difference of the Choice of Capital Budgeting Practices? Evidence from Sri Lanka," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 330351-3303, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:330351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa/article/download/11161/9845
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa/article/view/11161
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haka, Susan F., 1987. "Capital budgeting techniques and firm specific contingencies: A correlational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 31-48, January.
    2. Sandahl, Gert & Sjogren, Stefan, 2003. "Capital budgeting methods among Sweden's largest groups of companies. The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 51-69, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    2. Alpenberg, Jan & Hansson, Frida & Svensson, Lotten & Wnuk-Pel, Tomasz, 2025. "Beyond financial metrics: An integrated framework for capital investment decisions in the Swedish forest industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Segelod, Esbjorn, 1996. "Corporate control of investments and management styles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 227-237, June.
    4. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    5. Süreyya YILMAZ ÖZEKENCİ & Hatice DÜZAKIN, 2023. "Capital Budgeting Methods Used in Investment Project Evaluation: The Example of Top 500 Industrial Enterprises of Turkey," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 3.
    6. Magni, Carlo Alberto & Marchioni, Andrea, 2020. "Average rates of return, working capital, and NPV-consistency in project appraisal: A sensitivity analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Zahirul Hoque & Trevor Hopper, 1997. "Political and Industrial Relations Turbulence, Competition and Budgeting in the Nationalised Jute Mills of Bangladesh," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 125-143.
    8. Siziba, Simiso & Hall, John Henry, 2021. "The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    9. Peter Markovič & Michal Šinský, 2009. "Trends in application of capital budgeting methods for investment projects evaluation," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1).
    10. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    11. Littkemann, Jörn, 1997. "Erfolgreiche Gestaltung unternehmensinterner Abrechnungssysteme," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 436, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Warren, Liz & Jack, Lisa, 2018. "The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - A strategic conduct analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 481-496.
    13. Tor Brunzell & Eva Liljeblom & Mika Vaihekoski, 2013. "Determinants of capital budgeting methods and hurdle rates in Nordic firms," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(1), pages 85-110, March.
    14. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2015. "ROI and profitability index: A note on managerial performance," Department of Economics 0048, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    15. Sureka, Riya & Kumar, Satish & Colombage, Sisira & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2022. "Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    16. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Aggregate Return On Investment for investments under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 29-37.
    17. Dimitar Blagoev & Radostin Boyadzhiev, 2020. "Methodological Aspects of Management of Portfolios of Investment Projects for Real Assets of Business Organizations," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 71-90.
    18. Liljeblom, Eva & Vaihekoski, Mika, 2009. "Corporate ownership and managerial short-termism: Results from a Finnish study of management perceptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 427-438, February.
    19. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    20. Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov & Hartwig, Fredrik, 2012. "What Determines the Use of Capital Budgeting Methods? Evidence from Swedish listed companies," HUI Working Papers 57, HUI Research.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:330351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.