IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v44y2021i1p68-88.html

Can we afford the Green New Deal?

Author

Listed:
  • Yeva Nersisyan
  • L. Randall Wray

Abstract

The cost of the Green New Deal is usually estimated in financial terms, adding the projected costs of the various programs which leads to the conclusion that large tax hikes would be needed to pay for it. In this paper, we apply the methodology developed by J. M. Keynes in How to Pay for the War to offer a better approach for evaluating the affordability of the GND. We argue that the cost of the GND must be measured in terms of real resources, not financial costs. Affordability cannot be determined by adding up the financial costs and weighing them against prospective tax increases. What is required instead is a careful accounting of the resources the GND will require, weighing those against resources it will release plus what is already in excess supply. Only then can we determine whether a reduction of aggregate demand is needed, and consequently, whether we need counter-inflationary measures, such as tax hikes. While we acknowledge the major uncertainties involved in estimating real resource costs, we argue that our approach to affordability is much more relevant than the mainstream one.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeva Nersisyan & L. Randall Wray, 2021. "Can we afford the Green New Deal?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 68-88, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:44:y:2021:i:1:p:68-88
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2020.1835499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2020.1835499
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2020.1835499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esteban Cruz-Hidalgo & Stuart Medina-Miltimore & Agustín Mario, 2025. "Currencies Come and Go, But Employment Always Takes Root: Rethinking External Constraints and Monetary Sovereignty in the Periphery," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Giuliano Toshiro Yajima, 2021. "The Employer of Last Resort Scheme and the Energy Transition: A Stock-Flow Consistent Analysis," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_995, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Summa, Ricardo de Figueiredo, 2022. "Alternative uses of functional finance: Lerner, MMT and the Sraffiansh," IPE Working Papers 175/2021, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    4. Yeva Nersisyan, 2024. "Resource Constraints and Economic Policy," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1065, Levy Economics Institute.
    5. Olk, Christopher & Schneider, Colleen & Hickel, Jason, 2023. "How to pay for saving the world: Modern Monetary Theory for a degrowth transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Yeva Nersisyan & L. Randall Wray, 2024. "The Boy Who Cried Wolf About Government Debt," Economics Policy Note Archive 24-1, Levy Economics Institute.
    7. Olk, Christopher & Schneider, Colleen & Hickel, Jason, 2023. "How to pay for saving the world: Modern Monetary Theory for a degrowth transition," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120343, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-05000473 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Nikolaos Rodousakis & Giuliano Toshiro Yajima & George Soklis, 2024. "The Economic and Environmental Effects of a Green Employer of Last Resort: A Sectoral Multiplier Analysis for the United States," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 21-42, January.
    10. Yeva Nersisyan & L. Randall Wray, 2021. "Can Biden Build Back Better? Yes, If He Abandons Fiscal "Pay Fors"," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_155, Levy Economics Institute.
    11. Françoise Drumetz & Christian Pfister, 2021. "The Meaning of MMT," Working papers 833, Banque de France.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:44:y:2021:i:1:p:68-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.