IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev11d/v26y2020ip227-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ofelimità and Its Impact in Economy and Society

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Trifu

    (Professor Ph. D., "Petre Andrei" University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The concept was introduced by Vilfredo F. D. Pareto, a leading representative of the Lausanne School of Economic thought. Ophelimity comes from Greek, meaning something useful, advantageous for people. And in these challenging and bad days, it is a good landmark to refer to. The term is the expression of the ordinal preference-ranking indicator of the utility. That is, the setting of preferences in a certain order and the purchase of the goods/services depending on the intensity and urgency of the needs, now and on short-run. Therefore, using a survey of the literature in the field, we can deduce the tendencies of the human life and social-economic activities on short-run and, even, on medium-run, altogether with the elements of the Maslow Hierarchy Needs. The term utility of goods and services, even ophelimity is necessary towards regaining the basic needs of people and the re-birth of economies and of social life.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Trifu, 2020. "Ofelimità and Its Impact in Economy and Society," Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Scien, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 26, pages 227-233, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:26:y:2020:i::p:227-233
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/upa-sw/article/view/4071
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/61?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Peter P. Wakker & Rakesh Sarin, 1997. "Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 375-406.
    2. White,Lawrence H., 2012. "The Clash of Economic Ideas," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107621336.
    3. Aldo Montesano, 2006. "The Paretian Theory of Ophelimity in Closed and Open Cycles," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 14(3), pages 77-100.
    4. White,Lawrence H., 2012. "The Clash of Economic Ideas," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107012424.
    5. Read, Daniel, 2004. "Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 22750, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter J. Boettke & Liya Palagashvili, 2015. "Taming Leviathan," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 279-303.
    2. Paul D. Mueller, 2016. "Public and Private Institutions in the Federal Reserve," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 31(Fall 2016), pages 49-68.
    3. Richard Wagner, 2013. "What kind of state in our future? Fact and Conjecture in Vito Tanzi’s Government versus Markets," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 93-104, March.
    4. Lawrence White, 2014. "“Austerian” economics: Does the Vienna school favor fiscal deficit reduction even in a subpar economy?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 351-358, December.
    5. Stefan Kolev & Nils Goldschmidt & Jan-Otmar Hesse, 2020. "Debating liberalism: Walter Eucken, F. A. Hayek and the early history of the Mont Pèlerin Society," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 433-463, December.
    6. Scott Burns, 2018. "Human Capital and Its Structure," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 33(Summer 20), pages 33-51.
    7. Johnson, Noel D. & Koyama, Mark, 2017. "States and economic growth: Capacity and constraints," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Anthony J. Evans & Nicolás Cachanosky & Robert Thorpe, 2022. "The upper turning point in the Austrian business cycle theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 89-97, March.
    9. Ferlito, Carmelo, 2013. "Bruno Leoni and the Socialist Economic Calculation Debate," MPRA Paper 67745, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Khudokormov, Alexander G. (Худокормов, Александр) & Nevskiy, Sergey I. (Невский, Сергей), 2017. "National Schools of Economic Thought in Germany and the Theory of Social Market Economy [Национальные Экономические Школы В Германии И Теория Социального Рыночного Хозяйства]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 204-249, August.
    11. Kontek, Krzysztof, 2010. "Decision Utility Theory: Back to von Neumann, Morgenstern, and Markowitz," MPRA Paper 27141, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Giandomenica Becchio, 2018. "Austrian economics and development: The case of Sudha Shenoy’s analysis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 439-455, December.
    13. Hogan, Thomas L., 2015. "Has the Fed improved U.S. economic performance?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 257-266.
    14. Duarte Pablo, 2018. "Monetary Policy, Privileges and Economic Development: Ordoliberal Lessons for the EMU," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 135-152, July.
    15. Oláh, Dániel, 2018. "Neoliberalism as a Political Programme and Elements of its Implementation – A Narrative in Theoretical History," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 63(1), pages 96-112.
    16. Emilio Ocampo, 2020. "The Populist Economic Policy Paradigm: Early Peronism as an Archetype," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 731, Universidad del CEMA.
    17. Kolev, Stefan & Goldschmidt, Nils & Hesse, Jan-Otmar, 2014. "Walter Eucken's role in the early history of the Mont Pèlerin Society," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 14/02, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    18. Edward Lopez, 2015. "Introduction to the Public Choice Society at 50 years symposium," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 1-5, April.
    19. Constantinos Repapis, 2014. "J.M. Keynes, F.A. Hayek and the Common Reader," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-1, September.
    20. Leonidas Zelmanovitz & Carlos Newland & Juan Carlos Rosiello, 2022. "The great depression as a global currency crisis: An Argentine perspective," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 99-114, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ofelimità ; utilitarism; hierarchy of needs; satisfaction; functionality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:26:y:2020:i::p:227-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.