IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lpe/efijnl/202410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Problem, Partnership, and Training Effect on Productivity and Export: Evidence from Micro and Small Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Rifai Afin

    (Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, East Java, Indonesia)

Abstract

The primary objectives of this study are threefold: first, to investigate whether the challenges faced by micro and small industries motivate them to enter into partnerships; second, to assess the impact of partnerships on company productivity; and third, to explore the causal relationship between productivity and exports. We aim to determine whether productivity influences exports and vice versa or if a two-way relationship exists. The data used in this study consists of annual survey data from micro and small manufacturing companies, randomly collected by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) in 2015, with a total sample of 58,290 observations. The methodologies employed include Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to address endogeneity and selection bias issues when measuring the impact of partnerships on productivity. In addition, the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework involves logit regression estimation to assess whether perceived problems influence decisions regarding partnerships and training. The second stage of our analysis employs Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) estimation to investigate the simultaneity of productivity and exports. The results indicate that issues related to capital and raw materials significantly motivate companies to engage in partnerships, both in a general context and specific concerning capital and raw materials. Conversely, marketing issues do not significantly influence on marketing partnerships, although they do play a significant role in fostering general partnerships. Meanwhile, issues related to workforce skills do not appear to impact a company’s decision to engage in partnerships or conduct training programs. In terms of production and export estimation, general and specific partnerships demonstrated significantly higher positive impacts on productivity for companies that engage in these collaborative efforts. The 2SLS estimates support the findings from the PSM analysis, confirming that general and specific partnerships improve productivity. Furthermore, the simultaneous relationship estimation reveals a bidirectional relationship between productivity and exports.

Suggested Citation

  • Rifai Afin, 2024. "Perceived Problem, Partnership, and Training Effect on Productivity and Export: Evidence from Micro and Small Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 70, pages 147-171, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lpe:efijnl:202410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lpem.org/repec/lpe/efijnl/202410.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew C. Harvey, 1990. "The Econometric Analysis of Time Series, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 026208189x, December.
    2. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    3. Youssouf KIENDREBEOGO, 2012. "Export Activity and Productivity: New Evidence from the Egyptian Manufacturing Industry," Working Papers 201220, CERDI.
    4. Nile W. Hatch & Jeffrey H. Dyer, 2004. "Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(12), pages 1155-1178, December.
    5. Jamal Ouenniche & Aristotelis Boukouras & Mohammad Rajabi, 2016. "An Ordinal Game Theory Approach to the Analysis and Selection of Partners in Public–Private Partnership Projects," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 314-343, April.
    6. Morgan, Robert E. & Katsikeas, Constantine S., 1997. "Export stimuli: Export intention compared with export activity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 477-499, October.
    7. Zhiang (John) Lin & Haibin Yang & Bindu Arya, 2009. "Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(9), pages 921-940, September.
    8. Giovannetti, Emanuele & Piga, Claudio A., 2017. "The contrasting effects of active and passive cooperation on innovation and productivity: Evidence from British local innovation networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 102-112.
    9. Shahidur R. Khandker & Gayatri B. Koolwal & Hussain A. Samad, 2010. "Handbook on Impact Evaluation : Quantitative Methods and Practices," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2693, April.
    10. Pedrini, Giulio & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2022. "The impact of training on labour productivity in the European utilities sector: An empirical analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Sinking or swimming in the cluster labour pool? A firm-specific analysis of the effect of specialized labour," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Harsh W. Mishra, 2012. "Book Review: Catherine A. Maritan and Margaret A. Peteraf (Eds), Competitive Strategy, Vols I and II," Vision, , vol. 16(3), pages 222-226, September.
    3. Nuria Calvo & Flora Calvo, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and multiple agency theory: A case study of internal stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1223-1230, November.
    4. Ajay Bhaskarabhatla & Luis Cabral & Deepak Hegde & Thomas Peeters, 2021. "Are Inventors or Firms the Engines of Innovation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3899-3920, June.
    5. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Sebastian Kot & Armenia Androniceanu & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Anne Norheim-Hansen, 2018. "The Virtues of Green Strategies: Some Empirical Support from the Alliance Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1161-1173, September.
    7. Hwan Jin Kim, 2016. "The Comparative Effects of Transaction Cost Economics and Resource Based View: A Technological Alliance Motivational Perspective," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(5), pages 64-75, May.
    8. Zybura, Jan & Zybura, Nora & Ahrens, Jan-Philipp & Woywode, Michael, 2021. "Innovation in the post-succession phase of family firms: Family CEO successors and leadership constellations as resources," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2).
    9. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. W. David Allen & Donald J. Schepker & Clint Chadwick, 2022. "Firms' responses to changes in frictions in related human capital factor markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1347-1373, July.
    11. Bo-Xiang Hsu & Yi-Min Chen, 2019. "Industrial policy, social capital, human capital, and firm-level competitive advantage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 883-903, September.
    12. Malisić, Bojana & Tinaj, Sandra & Popović, Jovana & Lukovac, Lidija & Vlačić, Božidar, 2025. "Internal dynamics and innovation: A cross-disciplinary review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Ru Guo & Xiaodong Qiu & Yiyi He, 2021. "Research on Agricultural Cooperation Potential between China and CEE Countries Based on Resource Complementarity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Ibrahim Yazici & Omer Faruk Beyca & Omer Faruk Gurcan & Halil Zaim & Dursun Delen & Selim Zaim, 2022. "A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine the tacit knowledge criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 753-776, January.
    15. Naknok, Sakchai, 2016. "The Labour Attributes of Demand in the ASEAN Economic Community," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 23(2), December.
    16. Pan, Mengyang & Chen, Qiong & Xiao, Wenli, 2024. "Antecedents of radical innovation speed from a knowledge network perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    17. Elia, Stefano & Giuffrida, Maria & Mariani, Marcello M. & Bresciani, Stefano, 2021. "Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 158-169.
    18. Orly Carvache-Franco & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & Miguel A. Bustamante-Ubilla, 2022. "The Relationship between Human-Capital Variables and Innovative Performance: Evidence from Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Nayak, Bishwajit & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar & Krishnamoorthy, Bala, 2022. "Exploring the black box of competitive advantage – An integrated bibliometric and chronological literature review approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 964-982.
    20. Gueler, Melike Sarah & Schneider, Sabrina, 2021. "The resource-based view in business ecosystems: A perspective on the determinants of a valuable resource and capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-169.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lpe:efijnl:202410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Halley Yudhistira The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Muhammad Halley Yudhistira to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuinid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.