IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v19y2019i3d10.1007_s11115-018-0403-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Strategic Planning and Stakeholder Analysis: Suggesting a Dynamic Performance Management Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Noto

    (Institute of Management)

  • Lidia Noto

    (University of Palermo)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the contribution provided by stakeholder analysis to local strategic planning. The aim of the paper is to deal with the issue, emerging from both literature and practice, of linking stakeholders’ activities to the performance of the local area. Starting from the analysis of relevant studies on performance management in the public sector, strategic planning, and stakeholder theory, this work suggests the adoption of dynamic performance management as an instrumental approach to guide stakeholder analysis in local strategic planning processes. The study was conducted through an extensive literature review and is based on the re-framing of the real case of an Italian city’s strategic planning experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Noto & Lidia Noto, 2019. "Local Strategic Planning and Stakeholder Analysis: Suggesting a Dynamic Performance Management Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 293-310, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:19:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-018-0403-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-018-0403-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-018-0403-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-018-0403-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Aligica, 2006. "Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 79-90, March.
    2. Michael E. Porter, 1996. "Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 19(1-2), pages 85-90, April.
    3. Wang, Wei & Liu, Wenbin & Mingers, John, 2015. "A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 562-574.
    4. Krystyna A. Stave, 2002. "Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 139-167, June.
    5. Carmine Bianchi & Salvatore Tomaselli, 2015. "A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 370-385, October.
    6. Carmine Bianchi & Federico Cosenz & Milica Marinković, 2015. "Designing dynamic performance management systems to foster SME competitiveness according to a sustainable development perspective: empirical evidences from a case-study," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 84-108.
    7. Iain Begg, 1999. "Cities and Competitiveness," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 795-809, May.
    8. Louis Albrechts, 2004. "Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(5), pages 743-758, October.
    9. John Thomas & Theodore Poister, 2009. "Thinking About Stakeholders of Public Agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation Stakeholder Audit," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 67-82, March.
    10. Federico COSENZ, 2010. "A System Dynamics Approach to Analysing the Effect of Clientelism on Public Organizations Performance in Italy," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(2), pages 325-337, May.
    11. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2017. "Managerial Networking and Stakeholder Support in Public Service Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 237-254, June.
    12. Barry Richmond, 1993. "Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 113-133, June.
    13. Duggan, Deirdre E. & Farnsworth, Keith D. & Kraak, Sarah B.M., 2013. "Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 56-67.
    14. John Halligan & Cláudia S. Sarrico & Mary Lee Rhodes, 2012. "On the road to performance governance in the public domain?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 224-234, March.
    15. Pouloudi, Athanasia & Whitley, Edgar A., 1997. "Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27187, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Federico Cosenz & Guido Noto, 2016. "Applying System Dynamics Modelling to Strategic Management: A Literature Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 703-741, November.
    17. John M Bryson, 2004. "What to do when Stakeholders matter," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 21-53, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Salman & Mastura Jaafar & Diana Mohamad & Mana Khoshkam, 2023. "Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10261-10284, September.
    2. Amina Amari & Mohamed Mousa & Walid Chaouali & Zohra Ghali-Zinoubi & Narjess Aloui, 2023. "Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? Unpacking the Effects of Flexitime and Flexiplace: a Study on MENA Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1333-1352, December.
    3. Aneta Wysokinska-Senkus, 2020. "Improving the Organization in the Context of Building Sustainable Value for Stakeholders: A Polish Company Experience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 996-1010.
    4. Ruth Zárate-Rueda & Juan Sebastian Bautista-Zárate & Yolima Ivonne Beltrán-Villamizar, 2021. "Stakeholders within the framework of Corporate Social Responsibility: A systematic review," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 37(160), pages 460-471, August.
    5. Klayson Sesana Bonatto & Fábio Yoshio Suguri Motoki & João Eudes Bezerra Filho & Emerson Wagner Mainardes, 2022. "Social Accountability: E-Monitoring Public Management in an Emerging Economy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 155-172, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime Sobrino, 2014. "Urban competitiveness and industrial clusters in Mexico," Chapters, in: Pengfei Ni & Zheng Qiongjie (ed.), Urban Competitiveness and Innovation, chapter 15, pages 252-274, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Federico Cosenz & Vinicius Picanço Rodrigues & Francesco Rosati, 2020. "Dynamic business modeling for sustainability: Exploring a system dynamics perspective to develop sustainable business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 651-664, February.
    3. Schaller, Lena & Ehmeier, V & Kapfer, Martin & Kantelhardt, J., 2014. "Agricultural landscape as a driver of regional competitiveness - The role of stakeholder networks in landscape valorisation," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 174944, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:06a09 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pengfei Ni & Zheng Qiongjie (ed.), 2014. "Urban Competitiveness and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15020.
    6. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2019. "Framing the Sources of Image of a Local Area through Outcome-Based Dynamic Performance Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 249-271, June.
    7. Aima Khan & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Pål Ingebrigt Davidsen, 2020. "How do oil prices and investments impact the dynamics of firm value?," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 74-100, January.
    8. Wang, Wei & Liu, Wenbin & Mingers, John, 2015. "A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 562-574.
    9. Boonstra, Albert, 2006. "Stakeholder Management in IOS projects: Lessons from a case study," Research Report 06A09, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Adam C. Davis & Mirella L. Stroink, 2016. "The Relationship between Systems Thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 575-586, July.
    11. Bert George, 2017. "Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 527-530, November.
    12. Wajdi Abushabab & Reza Abdi, 2017. "Strategic Management Practices: An Investigation of Public Sector Organizations in the Kingdom of Bahrain," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 9(3), pages 47-60.
    13. Martin Luštický & Martin Musil, 2016. "Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Tourism Policy Priorities: The Case of the South Bohemian Region," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 3-23.
    14. Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Amadou Sidibé, 2023. "Observations from a system dynamics modeling field school in Mali," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(1), pages 80-94, January.
    15. Jolanta MAJ, 2015. "Diversity Management’S Stakeholders And Stakeholders Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 780-793, November.
    16. Khalid Saeed, 2014. "Jay Forrester's operational approach to economics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(4), pages 233-261, October.
    17. Carl Deschamps & Jan Mattijs, 2015. "Anatomy of a performance management system: the elusive path from targets to productivity," Working Papers CEB 15-037, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.
    19. Amrullah Rosadi & Paul Dargusch & Taryono Taryono, 2022. "Understanding How Marine Protected Areas Influence Local Prosperity—A Case Study of Gili Matra, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    21. Jesus R. Gastelum & Ganesh Krishnamurthy & Nemesciano Ochoa & Shane Sibbett & Margie Armstrong & Parag Kalaria, 2018. "The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2247-2260, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:19:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-018-0403-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.