IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v15y2015i3p399-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leadership Orientations of Russian Working Adults: Do Age, Gender, Education, and Government Work Experience Make a Difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Lam Nguyen
  • Natalia Ermasova
  • Victoria Geyfman
  • Bahaudin Mujtaba

Abstract

Working people often have different notions and attitudes toward leadership based on cultural background and context as well as various demographic traits. This study examines the leadership orientations of 519 Russian working adults based on age, gender, education, and government work experience. It appears that they are more relationship-oriented than task-oriented. Task-oriented leadership is the preferred style in government sector. Age and gender appear to be significant factors in determining the difference of task-oriented traits as older Russian people tend to be more task-oriented than younger Russian people and Russian males are more task-oriented than Russian females. Education appears to make a difference in the relationship but not in the task scores. In this paper, Russian history, culture and leadership, as well as the behavioral approach to leadership are presented along with practical implications and suggestions for managers, practitioners and future studies. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Lam Nguyen & Natalia Ermasova & Victoria Geyfman & Bahaudin Mujtaba, 2015. "Leadership Orientations of Russian Working Adults: Do Age, Gender, Education, and Government Work Experience Make a Difference?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 399-413, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:399-413
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-014-0279-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11115-014-0279-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-014-0279-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. House, Robert & Javidan, Mansour & Hanges, Paul & Dorfman, Peter, 2002. "Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 3-10, April.
    2. Ageev, Alexander I & Gratchev, Mikhail V & Hisrich, Robert D, 1995. "Entrepreneurship in the Soviet Union and Post-Socialist Russia," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 7(5), pages 365-376, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lam D. Nguyen & Natalia Ermasova & Loan N. T. Pham, 2018. "Leadership and Stress Orientation of Japanese and Russian Working Adults," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 968-987, August.
    2. Quan H N Tran, 2021. "Stress, Task, and Relationship Orientations of Vietnamese Working Adults: Do Age, Gender, and Government Work Experience Make a Difference?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 85-101, March.
    3. Natalia Ermasova & Lam Nguyen & Dina Clark & Sergey Ermasov, 2018. "The Management Skills of Russians: Do Work, Management, and Government Experiences Matter?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 299-312, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lam D. Nguyen & Natalia Ermasova & Loan N. T. Pham, 2018. "Leadership and Stress Orientation of Japanese and Russian Working Adults," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 968-987, August.
    2. Radziszewska Aleksandra, 2014. "Intercultural dimensions of entrepreneurship," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 35-47, April.
    3. Catana Gheorghe Alexandru & Catana Doina, 2012. "Societal Culture: A Comparison Of Romanian, Austrian And German Students Perspective," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1008-1013, July.
    4. Elenkov, Detelin S. & Manev, Ivan M., 2009. "Senior expatriate leadership's effects on innovation and the role of cultural intelligence," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 357-369, October.
    5. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.
    6. Victor Oltra & Jaime Bonache & Chris Brewster, 2013. "A New Framework for Understanding Inequalities Between Expatriates and Host Country Nationals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 291-310, June.
    7. Chong, Eric, 2013. "Managerial competencies and career advancement: A comparative study of managers in two countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 345-353.
    8. Elango, B. & Talluri, Srinivas (Sri), 2023. "A study of the impact of cultural dimensions on the operational orientation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2022. "The effect of cultural values on the strength of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational workplace deviance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 760-771.
    10. Kaasa, Anneli, 2016. "Culture, religion and productivity: Evidence from European regions," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 12(1), pages 1-18.
    11. Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan & Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Vishal K. Gupta & Gizem Atav & Dev K. Dutta, 2019. "Market orientation research: a qualitative synthesis and future research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 649-670, August.
    13. Reade, Carol & Lee, Hyun-Jung, 2012. "Organizational Commitment in Time of War: Assessing the Impact and Attenuation of Employee Sensitivity to Ethnopolitical Conflict," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 85-101.
    14. Laspita, Stavroula & Breugst, Nicola & Heblich, Stephan & Patzelt, Holger, 2012. "Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 414-435.
    15. Diana M. Hechavarría & Steven A. Brieger, 2022. "Practice rather than preach: cultural practices and female social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1131-1151, February.
    16. Shi, Yani & Sia, Choon Ling & Chen, Huaping, 2013. "Leveraging social grouping for trust building in foreign electronic commerce firms: An exploratory study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 419-428.
    17. Tom Thomas & Eric Lamm, 2012. "Legitimacy and Organizational Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 191-203, October.
    18. Catana Gheorghe Alexandru & Catana Doina, 2010. "Prospective Romanian Leaders' View On Leadership Dimensions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 645-650, July.
    19. David A. Griffith & Hannah S. Lee & Goksel Yalcinkaya, 2023. "Understanding the relationship between advertising spending and happiness at the country level," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 128-150, February.
    20. Anneli Kaasa, 2018. "Intangible factors and productivity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(2), pages 300-325, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:399-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.