IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union


  • Måns Nilsson


  • Andrew Jordan
  • John Turnpenny
  • Julia Hertin
  • Björn Nykvist
  • Duncan Russel


No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Måns Nilsson & Andrew Jordan & John Turnpenny & Julia Hertin & Björn Nykvist & Duncan Russel, 2008. "The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 335-355, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:41:y:2008:i:4:p:335-355
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-008-9071-1

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. repec:cup:apsrev:v:95:y:2001:i:01:p:169-190_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Pearce, David, 1998. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 84-100, Winter.
    3. Nick Hanley, 2001. "Cost - benefit analysis and environmental policymaking," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 19(1), pages 103-118, February.
    4. Morgenstern, Richard & Harrington, Winston, 2004. "Evaluating Regulatory Impact Analyses," Discussion Papers dp-04-04, Resources For the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Kupiec Tomasz, 2015. "Regulatory Impact Analysis Practice in New Zealand in the Light of Models of Evaluation Use – Inspiration for the Polish Government," Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, De Gruyter Open, vol. 23(2), pages 109-128, June.
    2. Vigren , Andreas & Ljungberg , Anders, 2017. "Public transport authorities’ use of cost-benefit analysis in practice," Working papers in Transport Economics 2017:8, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    3. Daniel Antony Kolkman & Paolo Campo & Tina Balke-Visser & Nigel Gilbert, 2016. "How to build models for government: criteria driving model acceptance in policymaking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 489-504, December.
    4. Hyder, Kieran & Rossberg, Axel G. & Allen, J. Icarus & Austen, Melanie C. & Barciela, Rosa M. & Bannister, Hayley J. & Blackwell, Paul G. & Blanchard, Julia L. & Burrows, Michael T. & Defriez, Emma & , 2015. "Making modelling count - increasing the contribution of shelf-seas community and ecosystem models to policy development and management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 291-302.
    5. repec:eee:rensus:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:110-127 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dave Huitema & Andrew Jordan & Eric Massey & Tim Rayner & Harro Asselt & Constanze Haug & Roger Hildingsson & Suvi Monni & Johannes Stripple, 2011. "The evaluation of climate policy: theory and emerging practice in Europe," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(2), pages 179-198, June.
    7. Uba, Katrin, 2010. "Who formulates renewable-energy policy? A Swedish example," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6674-6683, November.
    8. repec:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:5:p:411:d:68948 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Nicole Herweg, 2016. "Explaining European agenda-setting using the multiple streams framework: the case of European natural gas regulation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(1), pages 13-33, March.
    10. Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Ola Eriksson & Anna Björklund & Göran Östblom & Tomas Ekvall & Göran Finnveden & Yevgeniya Arushanyan & Jan-Olov Sundqvist, 2016. "Integrated Economic and Environmental Assessment of Waste Policy Instruments," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Saujot, Mathieu & de Lapparent, Matthieu & Arnaud, Elise & Prados, Emmanuel, 2016. "Making land use – Transport models operational tools for planning: From a top-down to an end-user approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 20-29.
    12. Radchenko, Tatiana & Parshina, Elena, 2014. "Regulatory Impact Assessment in Russia: Practical Applications and conclusions of the theory," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    13. Ferreira, Joaquim & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Brito, Jorge de, 2013. "Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1453-1460.
    14. repec:kap:policy:v:50:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s11077-017-9302-4 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:41:y:2008:i:4:p:335-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.