IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v95y2001i01p191-198_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Olsen, Johan P.

Abstract

Bendor, Moe, and Shotts want to rescue some of the ideas of the garbage can model and the new institutionalism. Their rescue program, however, is alien to the spirit of not only our work but also some recent developments that may promise a climate of dialogue between different approaches in political science. Bendor, Moe, and Shotts place themselves closer to a tradition of unproductive tribal warfare than to more recent attempts to explore the limits of and the alternatives to (means-end) rational interpretations of political actors, institutions, and change. By building on a narrow concept of what is valuable political science, they cut themselves off from key issues that have occupied political scientists for centuries.

Suggested Citation

  • Olsen, Johan P., 2001. "Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(1), pages 191-198, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:95:y:2001:i:01:p:191-198_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055401000120/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fritz Sager & Yvan Rielle, 2013. "Sorting through the garbage can: under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Guido Fioretti & Alessandro Lomi, 2010. "Passing the buck in the garbage can model of organizational choice," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 113-143, June.
    3. Weiqing Song, 2011. "Open method of coordination and the gloomy future of social Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 13-27, November.
    4. Alberto Asquer & Inna Krachkovskaya, 2021. "Uncertainty, institutions and regulatory responses to emerging technologies: CRISPR Gene editing in the US and the EU (2012–2019)," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1111-1127, October.
    5. Collantes, Gustavo, 2008. "The dimensions of the policy debate over transportation energy: The case of hydrogen in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1059-1073, March.
    6. Collantes, Gustavo Oscar, 2008. "The dimensions of the policy debate over transportation energy: The case of hydrogen in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt91f3d1ns, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Måns Nilsson & Andrew Jordan & John Turnpenny & Julia Hertin & Björn Nykvist & Duncan Russel, 2008. "The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 335-355, December.
    8. James Buthman, 2015. "Institutionalizing renewable electricity: the long-term potential for policy learning," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 526-536, December.
    9. Gesa Pflitsch & Verena Radinger-Peer, 2018. "Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions—A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Maldonado Alcudia Ana Virginia del Carmen & Maldonado Alcudia Cesar Miguel & Maldonado Alcudia Minerva Candelaria, 2015. "Employee involvement in hotel total quality management," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(4), pages 55-67, December.
    11. Collantes, Gustavo O, 2008. "The dimensions of the policy debate over transportation energy: The case of hydrogen in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt82j0z800, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Guido Fioretti & Alessandro Lomi, 2007. "An Agent-Based Representation of the Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1.
    13. Jeffrey T. Checkel & Andrew Moravcsik, 2001. "A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies?," European Union Politics, , vol. 2(2), pages 219-249, June.
    14. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:27-48 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:95:y:2001:i:01:p:191-198_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.