IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/netspa/v18y2018i1d10.1007_s11067-018-9384-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retail Equilibrium with Switching Consumers in Electricity Markets

Author

Listed:
  • C. Ruiz

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)

  • F. J. Nogales

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    UC3M-BS Institute of Financial Big Data)

  • F. J. Prieto

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    UC3M-BS Institute of Financial Big Data)

Abstract

The ongoing transformations of power systems worldwide pose important challenges, both economic and technical, for their appropriate planning and operation. A key approach to improve the efficiency of these systems is through demand-side management, i.e., to promote the active involvement of consumers in the system. In particular, the current trend is to conceive systems where electricity consumers can vary their load according to real-time price incentives, offered by retailing companies. Under this setting, retail competition plays an important role as inadequate prices or services may entail consumers switching to a rival retailer. In this work we consider a game theoretical model where asymmetric retailers compete in prices to increase their profits by accounting for the utility function of consumers. Consumer preferences for retailers are uncertain and distributed within a Hotelling line. We analytically characterize the equilibrium of a retailer duopoly, establishing its existence and uniqueness conditions for a wide class of utility functions. Furthermore, sensitivities of the equilibrium prices with respect to relevant model parameters are also provided. The duopoly model is extended to a network that includes multiple retailers with capacity constraints for which we perform static and dynamic numerical simulations. Results indicate that, depending on the retailer costs, loyalty rewards and initial market shares, the resulting equilibrium can range from complete competition to one in which a retailer has a leading or even a dominant position in the market, decreasing the consumers’ utility significantly. Moreover, the retailer network configuration also plays an important role in the competitiveness of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Ruiz & F. J. Nogales & F. J. Prieto, 2018. "Retail Equilibrium with Switching Consumers in Electricity Markets," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 145-180, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:18:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11067-018-9384-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11067-018-9384-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11067-018-9384-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11067-018-9384-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Joskow & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Retail electricity competition," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 799-815, December.
    2. Di Giorgio, Alessandro & Liberati, Francesco, 2014. "Near real time load shifting control for residential electricity prosumers under designed and market indexed pricing models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 119-132.
    3. Paulo Somaini & Liran Einav, 2013. "A Model of Market Power in Customer Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 938-986, December.
    4. Greg Shaffer & Z. John Zhang, 1995. "Competitive Coupon Targeting," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 395-416.
    5. Andrew Rhodes, 2014. "Re-examining the effects of switching costs," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(1), pages 161-194, September.
    6. Waterson, Michael, 2003. "The role of consumers in competition and competition policy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 129-150, February.
    7. Paul Joskow & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Retail electricity competition," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 799-815, December.
    8. Alessandro Acquisti & Hal R. Varian, 2005. "Conditioning Prices on Purchase History," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 367-381, May.
    9. Toker Doganoglu, 2010. "Switching costs, experience goods and dynamic price competition," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 167-205, June.
    10. Armstrong, Mark, 1998. "Network Interconnection in Telecommunications," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(448), pages 545-564, May.
    11. Farrell, Joseph & Klemperer, Paul, 2007. "Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 31, pages 1967-2072, Elsevier.
    12. Shaffer, G. & Zhang, Z.J., 1994. "Competitive Coupon Targeting," Papers 94-02, Michigan - Center for Research on Economic & Social Theory.
    13. Chris M. Wilson & Catherine Waddams Price, 2010. "Do consumers switch to the best supplier?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 647-668, October.
    14. Pedro A. Neto & Terry L. Friesz & Ke Han, 2016. "Electric Power Network Oligopoly as a Dynamic Stackelberg Game," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1211-1241, December.
    15. Waterson, Michael, 2003. "Consumers and Competition," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 679, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    16. Gallay, Olivier & Hongler, Max-Olivier, 2008. "Market sharing dynamics between two service providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 241-254, October.
    17. Dávid Csercsik, 2016. "Competition and Cooperation in a Bidding Model of Electrical Energy Trade," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1043-1073, December.
    18. Jean-Jacques Laffont & Patrick Rey & Jean Tirole, 1998. "Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 29(1), pages 1-37, Spring.
    19. Muller, Moritz & Sensfu[ss], Frank & Wietschel, Martin, 2007. "Simulation of current pricing-tendencies in the German electricity market for private consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4283-4294, August.
    20. Xia, Yu, 2011. "Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 194-203, April.
    21. Oliveira, Fernando S. & Ruiz, Carlos & Conejo, Antonio J., 2013. "Contract design and supply chain coordination in the electricity industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 527-537.
    22. Alexander Zerrahn & Daniel Huppmann, 2017. "Network Expansion to Mitigate Market Power," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 611-644, June.
    23. Juan Jiménez & Jordi Perdiguero, 2011. "Does Accessibility Affect Retail Prices and Competition? An Empirical Application," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 677-699, December.
    24. Yongmin Chen & Michael H. Riordan, 2007. "Price and Variety in the Spokes Model," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(522), pages 897-921, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgi N. Todorov & Andrey I. Vlasov & Elena E. Volkova & Marina A. Osintseva, 2020. "Sustainability in Local Power Supply Systems of Production Facilities Where There Is the Compensatory Use of Renewable Energy Sources," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 14-23.
    2. Oggioni, Giorgia & Schwartz, Alexandra & Wiertz, Ann-Kathrin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2024. "Dynamic pricing and strategic retailers in the energy sector: A multi-leader-follower approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 255-272.
    3. Arega Getaneh Abate & Rosana Riccardi & Carlos Ruiz, 2021. "Dynamic tariff-based demand response in retail electricity market under uncertainty," Papers 2105.03405, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cte:wsrepe:ws1522 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Xuejuan Su, 2015. "Have customers benefited from electricity retail competition?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 146-182, April.
    3. Mark Armstrong & David E.M. Sappington, 2006. "Regulation, Competition and Liberalization," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 325-366, June.
    4. Andrew Rhodes, 2014. "Re-examining the effects of switching costs," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(1), pages 161-194, September.
    5. Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr & Petter Vegard Hansen, 2010. "Electricity Retailing in Norway," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1), pages 25-46, January.
    6. Tulabandhula, Theja & Ouksel, Aris M. & Nguyen, Son The, 2023. "Impact of customer loyalty and differing firm costs on price discrimination in an infinite horizon setting," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 344-377.
    7. Guillem Roig, 2021. "Collusive equilibria with switching costs: The effect of consumer concentration," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 100-121, February.
    8. Guillem Roig, 2017. "Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs," Documentos de Trabajo 15621, Universidad del Rosario.
    9. Dávid Csercsik & László Á. Kóczy, 2017. "Efficiency and Stability in Electrical Power Transmission Networks: a Partition Function Form Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1161-1184, December.
    10. Lam, W., 2015. "Switching Costs in Two-sided Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Wilson, Chris M, 2009. "Market Frictions: A Unified Model of Search and Switching Costs," MPRA Paper 13672, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Papadopoulos, Alexandros & McGowan, Féidhlim & McGinnity, Frances & Timmons, Shane & Lunn, Pete, 2023. "Switching activity in retail financial markets in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS161.
    13. Irene Maria Buso & John Hey, 2021. "Why do consumers not switch? An experimental investigation of a search and switch model," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 445-476, November.
    14. Evens Salies, 2012. "Product Innovation when Consumers have Switching Costs," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Evens Salies, 2008. "Mergers in the GB electricity market: effects on retail charges," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(11), pages 1483-1490.
    16. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6143 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lach, Saul & Moraga-González, José-Luis, 2009. "Heterogeneous Price Information and the Effect of Competition," CEPR Discussion Papers 7319, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hc03jc5h8 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/7068 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Haitao Xiang & Ying Kong & Wai Kin Victor Chan & Sum Wai Chiang, 2019. "Impact of Price–Quantity Uncertainties and Risk Aversion on Energy Retailer’s Pricing and Hedging Behaviors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    21. Luis López, Ángel, 2011. "Mobile termination rates and the receiver-pays regime," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 171-181, June.
    22. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6143 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Tingting He & Dmitri Kuksov & Chakravarthi Narasimhan, 2017. "Free in-network pricing as an entry-deterrence strategy," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 279-303, September.
    24. Lee, Dongyeol, 2015. "Regulating termination charges in asymmetric oligopolies," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 16-28.
    25. Yoonhee Tina Chang & Catherine Waddams Price, 2008. "Gain or Pain: Does Consumer Activity Reflect Utility Maximisation?," Working Papers 08-15, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:18:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11067-018-9384-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.