Arts policy research for the next 25 years: a trajectory after Patrons Despite Themselves
No abstract is available for this item.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:spr:compst:v:61:y:2005:i:2:p:345-346 is not listed on IDEAS
- Francesca Borgonovi & Michael O'Hare, 2004. "The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 21-36, February.
- Ruth Towse, 2008. "Why has cultural economics ignored copyright?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 243-259, December.
- R. Henrion, 2005. "Book Review," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 345-346, 06.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jculte:v:32:y:2008:i:4:p:281-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.