IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v202y2025i1d10.1007_s10551-025-05977-z.html

The Preference for Unsolicited Advice: When We Have to Make a Trade-Off Between Self-interest and Morality

Author

Listed:
  • Huanmeng Tian

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xinni Wei

    (Wuhan University)

  • Feng Yu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Liying Xu

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

When faced with important decisions, individuals often receive advice from others. While previous research suggests that unsolicited advice is typically met with more negative reactions due to perceived threats to personal agency, little attention has been given to contexts in which individuals willingly relinquish their decision-making agency. This study explores decision-making in trade-off scenarios, where individuals must balance conflicting moral and self-interest goals. We hypothesize and find that unsolicited advice promoting self-serving choices facilitates the transfer of decision responsibility more effectively than solicited advice, leading to a preference for unsolicited advice. Furthermore, we show that this preference is moderated by the extent to which individuals emphasize moral identity symbolization and by the content of the advice. Our findings underscore the crucial role of the motivation to transfer decision responsibility in shaping responses to different forms of advice solicitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanmeng Tian & Xinni Wei & Feng Yu & Liying Xu, 2025. "The Preference for Unsolicited Advice: When We Have to Make a Trade-Off Between Self-interest and Morality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 35-53, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:202:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-025-05977-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-025-05977-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-025-05977-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-025-05977-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez & Cass R. Sunstein & Tali Sharot, 2017. "The intrinsic value of choice: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 187-202, June.
    2. Mary Steffel & Elanor F Williams & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Andrea MoralesAssociate Editor, 2018. "Delegating Decisions: Recruiting Others to Make Choices We Might Regret," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1015-1032.
    3. repec:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2021:i:5:p:716-736. is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sara Kim & Rocky Peng Chen & Ke Zhang, 2016. "Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 282-302.
    5. Zheshuai Yang & Yan Zhang, 2024. "Easy to Be Selfish: When and Why Is One Individual as Influential as Multiple Individuals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(3), pages 595-615.
    6. Margarita Leib & Nils Köbis & Rainer Michael Rilke & Marloes Hagens & Bernd Irlenbusch, 2024. "Corrupted by Algorithms? How AI-generated and Human-written Advice Shape (Dis)honesty," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(658), pages 766-784.
    7. Hristina Nikolova & Cait Lamberton & Nicole Verrochi Coleman & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Stijn van OsselaerAssociate Editor, 2018. "Stranger Danger: When and Why Consumer Dyads Behave Less Ethically Than Individuals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 90-108.
    8. Ritov, Ilana & Baron, Jonathan, 1992. "Status-Quo and Omission Biases," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 49-61, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Yuhong & Blayac, Thierry & Willinger, Marc, 2025. "Delegating moral dilemmas in autonomous vehicles evidence from an online experiment in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 721-752.
    2. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    3. Ertac, Seda & Gumren, Mert & Gurdal, Mehmet Y., 2020. "Demand for decision autonomy and the desire to avoid responsibility in risky environments: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.
    5. Arlen, Jennifer H. & Tontrup, Stephan, 2015. "Strategic Bias Shifting: Herding as a Behaviorally Rational Response to Regret Aversion," EconStor Preprints 335573, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Antonides, Gerrit & Kroft, Maaike, 2005. "Fairness judgments in household decision making," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 902-913, December.
    7. Yao Lu & Junqi Wang & Chunxiu Zhang & Qin Xiao & Ailian Wang, 2025. "Impact of anthropomorphism on consumer emotions and satisfaction in product failure: behavioral and event-related potentials evidence," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Erica Mina Okada, 2010. "Uncertainty, Risk Aversion, and WTA vs. WTP," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 75-84, 01-02.
    9. Deeksha Singh & Sambashiva Rao Kunja, 2026. "Escaping the reality with humanized brands: Examining the role of anthropomorphized brands in fostering continued engagement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1071-1090, April.
    10. Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak & Lukasz Skowron & Lachezar Ivanov, 2020. "“I Will Start Saving Natural Resources, Only When You Show Me the Planet as a Person in Danger”: The Effects of Message Framing and Anthropomorphism on Pro-Environmental Behaviors that are Viewed as Effortful," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Fildes, Robert & Goodwin, Paul & Onkal, Dilek, 2015. "Information use in supply chain forecasting," MPRA Paper 66034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Rachel Croson & James Sundali, 2005. "The Gambler’s Fallacy and the Hot Hand: Empirical Data from Casinos," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 195-209, May.
    13. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Michele Garagnani, 2023. "Part-Time Bayesians: Incentives and Behavioral Heterogeneity in Belief Updating," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5523-5542, September.
    14. Christina Gravert, 2024. "From Intent to Inertia: Experimental Evidence from the Retail Electricity Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 11139, CESifo.
    15. Han, Jie & Wang, Desheng & Yang, Zhihao, 2023. "Acting like an interpersonal relationship: Cobrand anthropomorphism increases product evaluation and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Inman, J.J. & Zeelenberg, M., 2002. "Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions : The attenuating role of decision justifiability," Other publications TiSEM 44060120-bd30-40e0-a97f-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. James C. Cox & Maroš Servátka & Radovan Vadovic, 2012. "Status Quo Effects in Fairness Games: Reciprocal Responses to Acts of Commission vs. Acts of Omission," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2012-03, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, revised Mar 2016.
    18. Huang, Jingya & Wang, Liangyan & Chan, Eugene, 2024. "When does anthropomorphism hurt? How tool anthropomorphism negatively affects consumers' rewards for tool users," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Ert, Eyal & Erev, Ido, 2008. "The rejection of attractive gambles, loss aversion, and the lemon avoidance heuristic," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 715-723, November.
    20. Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:202:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-025-05977-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.