IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v191y2024i2d10.1007_s10551-023-05488-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escaping the Scapegoat Trap: Using René Girard’s Framework for Workplace Bullying

Author

Listed:
  • Guglielmo Faldetta

    (Kore University of Enna, Cittadella Universitaria)

  • Deborah Gervasi

    (Kore University of Enna, Cittadella Universitaria)

Abstract

This study aims at developing a theoretical model for workplace bullying using René Girard’s scapegoating framework. Despite the wide range of labels and related constructs present in workplace bullying literature, the explanation of the phenomenon is often studied under theoretical frameworks that do not always capture the nature of the concept. Indeed, the need to find instruments and tools to reduce or solve workplace bullying overshadowed conceptual and theoretical matters, leaving the concept undertheorized. By broadening the spectrum of social sciences beyond managerial and organizational studies, we propose to use René Girard’s scapegoating framework to shed new light on workplace bullying. The scapegoating framework allows us to understand better some collective and social dimensions of workplace bullying, catching relevant elements that characterize this phenomenon, also those that are less evident from organizational studies. In a Girardian sense, scapegoating is like a trap that every human society falls into, and many aspects of workplace bullying recall its mechanism. For Girard, a human group or society can fall into a spiral of reciprocal violence because of the mimetic desire mechanism, risking a conflict escalation: violence begets more violence, putting at risk the stability or even the existence of this group or society. Scapegoating is a way to overcome reciprocal violence by uniting against a single victim who cannot reciprocate this violence. This study also proposes a tentative way to escape this trap: positive mimesis and gift-giving.

Suggested Citation

  • Guglielmo Faldetta & Deborah Gervasi, 2024. "Escaping the Scapegoat Trap: Using René Girard’s Framework for Workplace Bullying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 269-283, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:191:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05488-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05488-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-023-05488-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-023-05488-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elfi Baillien & Jeroen Camps & Anja Van den Broeck & Jeroen Stouten & Lode Godderis & Maarten Sercu & Hans De Witte, 2016. "An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Blind: Conflict Escalation into Workplace Bullying and the Role of Distributive Conflict Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 415-429, August.
    2. Irena Pilch & Elżbieta Turska, 2015. "Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 83-93, April.
    3. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    4. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.
    5. Elfi Baillien & Jeroen Camps & Anja Broeck & Jeroen Stouten & Lode Godderis & Maarten Sercu & Hans Witte, 2016. "Erratum to: An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Blind: Conflict Escalation into Workplace Bullying and the Role of Distributive Conflict Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 431-431, August.
    6. Mélia Djabi & Oriane Sitte de Longueval, 2020. "Scapegoating in the Organization: Which Regulation Modes?," Post-Print hal-03850768, HAL.
    7. Ståle Einarsen, 1999. "The nature and causes of bullying at work," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1/2), pages 16-27, February.
    8. Jeremy D. Mackey & Jeremy R. Brees & Charn P. McAllister & Michelle L. Zorn & Mark J. Martinko & Paul Harvey, 2018. "Victim and Culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 659-673, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascale Desrumaux & Nicolas Gillet & Caroline Nicolas, 2018. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Belief in a Just World and Supervisor Support on Burnout via Bullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Jeremy D. Mackey & Jeremy R. Brees & Charn P. McAllister & Michelle L. Zorn & Mark J. Martinko & Paul Harvey, 2018. "Victim and Culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 659-673, December.
    3. Omer Farooq Malik & Shaun Pichler, 2023. "Linking Perceived Organizational Politics to Workplace Cyberbullying Perpetration: The Role of Anger and Fear," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 445-463, August.
    4. Bénédicte de Peyrelongue & Olivier Masclef & Valérie Guillard, 2017. "The Need to Give Gratuitously: A Relevant Concept Anchored in Catholic Social Teaching to Envision the Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 739-755, November.
    5. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    6. Jeremy D. Mackey & Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander, 2021. "Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 755-775, February.
    7. Manuel Guillén & Ignacio Ferrero & W. Hoffman, 2015. "The Neglected Ethical and Spiritual Motivations in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(4), pages 803-816, June.
    8. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    9. Nikolaus Franke & Martin Schreier & Ulrike Kaiser, 2010. "The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 125-140, January.
    10. Pilar Rojas Gaviria, 2012. "Three essays on how sharing and consuming support home place reconnection in contemporary liquid times," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209597, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Lena Zahlquist & Jørn Hetland & Guy Notelaers & Michael Rosander & Ståle Valvatne Einarsen, 2023. "When the Going Gets Tough and the Environment Is Rough: The Role of Departmental Level Hostile Work Climate in the Relationships between Job Stressors and Workplace Bullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Compeau, Larry D. & Monroe, Kent B. & Grewal, Dhruv & Reynolds, Kristy, 2016. "Expressing and defining self and relationships through everyday shopping experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1035-1042.
    13. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    14. Domènec Melé & Joan Fontrodona, 2017. "Christian Ethics and Spirituality in Leading Business Organizations: Editorial Introduction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 671-679, November.
    15. Avner Offer, 2013. "Regard," Chapters, in: Luigino Bruni & Stefano Zamagni (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Reciprocity and Social Enterprise, chapter 29, pages 285-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    17. Cruz-Cárdenas, Jorge & del Val Núñez, M. Teresa, 2016. "Clothing disposition by gifting: Benefits for consumers and new consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4975-4979.
    18. Arpana Rai & Upasna A. Agarwal, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Exposure to Workplace Bullying," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(4), pages 1069-1087, August.
    19. Margaret Hodgins & Rhona Kane & Yariv Itzkovich & Declan Fahie, 2024. "Workplace Bullying and Harassment in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:191:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05488-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.