IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v29y2023i3d10.1007_s11294-023-09874-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficient to Measure the Population Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Fazley K. Siddiq

    (University of New Brunswick)

  • Halyna Klymentieva

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Taylor J. C. Lee

    (University of New Brunswick)

Abstract

The population distribution in Canada across subnational jurisdictions exhibits significant inequality. Precipitous growth within concentrated urban agglomerations, culminating in severe rural depopulation, has perpetuated existing subnational population growth disparities. More densely populated metropolitan areas are experiencing an increasing proportion of the aggregate population, while ruralized jurisdictions succumb to a dramatic population exodus. Accordingly, the geographic dispersion of the Canadian population has become increasingly skewed, and thus a substantial proportion of the national populace is concentrated within a handful of metropolitan jurisdictions. The localization of growth within urbanized zones renders the geography of the population distribution increasingly volatile, thereby carving a fault line into the landscape of the national economy. Using census data from 1991 to the most recent (2021), this study formulates a novel quantification of the unequal distribution of population in Canada over time, utilizing an adaptation of the Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient. The findings exhibit significant and growing inequality in the population distribution with a substantial proportion of the national populace concentrated within a few metropolitan areas. Rising rent and real estate prices have led to increasing gentrification, fundamentally altering the economic and social reality of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Fazley K. Siddiq & Halyna Klymentieva & Taylor J. C. Lee, 2023. "Applying the Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficient to Measure the Population Distribution," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(3), pages 177-192, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:29:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11294-023-09874-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11294-023-09874-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11294-023-09874-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11294-023-09874-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moritz Kuhn & Moritz Schularick & Ulrike I. Steins, 2020. "Income and Wealth Inequality in America, 1949–2016," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(9), pages 3469-3519.
    2. Andrew Chesher & Christian Schluter, 2002. "Welfare Measurement and Measurement Error," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(2), pages 357-378.
    3. Jess Benhabib & Alberto Bisin & Shenghao Zhu, 2011. "The Distribution of Wealth and Fiscal Policy in Economies With Finitely Lived Agents," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 123-157, January.
    4. Lars Osberg, 2017. "On the Limitations of Some Current Usages of the Gini Index," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(3), pages 574-584, September.
    5. Fazley K. Siddiq, 2020. "The Extraordinary Decline of Non-Metropolitan Areas in Canada and the United States," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 189-191, May.
    6. Jean-Yves Duclos & Joan Esteban & Debraj Ray, 2004. "Polarization: Concepts, Measurement, Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(6), pages 1737-1772, November.
    7. Junnan Xiong & Chongchong Ye & Tiancai Zhou & Weiming Cheng, 2019. "Health Risk and Resilience Assessment with Respect to the Main Air Pollutants in Sichuan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Wolff, Edward N, 1992. "Changing Inequality of Wealth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 552-558, May.
    9. Corrado Gini, 2005. "On the measurement of concentration and variability of characters," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 1-38.
    10. Jens Peter Kristensen, 2022. "The Gini coefficient and discontinuity," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2072451-207, December.
    11. Lerman, Robert I. & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1984. "A note on the calculation and interpretation of the Gini index," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 15(3-4), pages 363-368.
    12. Danziger, Sheldon & Gottschalk, Peter, 1987. "Earnings Inequality, the Spatial Concentration of Poverty, and the Underclass," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(2), pages 211-215, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Blanchet, 2022. "Uncovering the Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution," Working Papers hal-03865295, HAL.
    2. Carsten Schröder & Yolanda Golan & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2014. "Inequality and the time structure of earnings: evidence from Germany," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(3), pages 393-409, September.
    3. Mariacristina De Nardi & Giulio Fella, 2017. "Saving and Wealth Inequality," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 26, pages 280-300, October.
    4. Mariacristina De Nardi, 2015. "Quantitative Models of Wealth Inequality: A Survey," NBER Working Papers 21106, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Roberto Brunetti & Carl Gaigné & Fabien Moizeau, 2023. "Land, Wealth, and Taxation," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 2023-06, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    6. Kovač Rijad & Verbič Miroslav, 2023. "Wealth Inequality and Institutional Development: Macroeconometric Evidence from a Global Sample," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 100-114, June.
    7. Edna Schechtman & Gideon Schechtman, 2019. "The relationship between Gini terminology and the ROC curve," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(3), pages 171-178, December.
    8. Amit Shelef & Edna Schechtman, 2019. "A Gini-based time series analysis and test for reversibility," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 687-716, June.
    9. I. Josa & A. Aguado, 2020. "Measuring Unidimensional Inequality: Practical Framework for the Choice of an Appropriate Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 541-570, June.
    10. Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2010. "Is There Room For Polarization?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(1), pages 7-22, March.
    11. Quentin Wodon, 2000. "Microdeterminants of consumption, poverty, growth, and inequality in Bangladesh," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1337-1352.
    12. Stavros Panageas & Nicolae Garleanu, 2008. "Yooung, Old, Conservative and Bold: The implications of finite lives and heterogeneity for asset prices," 2008 Meeting Papers 409, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    13. Grossmann, Volker & Larin, Benjamin & Löfflad, Hans Torben & Steger, Thomas, 2021. "Distributional consequences of surging housing rents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Alisdair McKay, 2011. "Household Saving Behavior and Social Security Privatization," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2011-027, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    15. Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Thomas Piketty, 2016. "Accounting for Wealth Inequality Dynamics: Methods, Estimates and Simulations for France (1800-2014)," World Inequality Lab Working Papers halshs-02794339, HAL.
    16. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    17. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    18. Koen Decancq, 2020. "Measuring cumulative deprivation and affluence based on the diagonal dependence diagram," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(2), pages 103-117, August.
    19. Esmeralda Ramalho, 2004. "Covariate Measurement Error in Endogenous Stratified Samples," Economics Working Papers 2_2004, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    20. Thomas Blanchet & Juliette Fournier & Thomas Piketty, 2022. "Generalized Pareto Curves: Theory and Applications," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 263-288, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:29:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11294-023-09874-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.