IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v68y2026i2d10.1007_s10614-024-10574-9.html

Robust Prediction Intervals for Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities: A Comparative Study of Five Models

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Sun

    (Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)

  • Haoyuan Wang

    (Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)

  • Donglin Wang

    (Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)

Abstract

Valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities (VAs) is a well-researched area in the actuarial science field. However, the study of producing reliable prediction intervals for prices has received comparatively less attention. Compared to point prediction, the prediction interval can calculate a reasonable price range of VAs and help investors and insurance companies better manage risk to maintain profitability and sustainability. In this study, we address this gap by utilizing five different models in conjunction with bootstrapping techniques to generate robust prediction intervals for variable annuity prices. Our findings show that the Gradient Boosting regression (GBR) model provides the narrowest intervals compared to the other four models. While the Random sample consensus (RANSAC) model has the highest coverage rate, but it has the widest interval. In practical applications, considering the trade-off between coverage rate and interval width, the GBR model would be a preferred choice. Therefore, we recommend using the gradient boosting model with the bootstrap method to calculate the prediction interval of valuation for a large portfolio of variable annuity policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Sun & Haoyuan Wang & Donglin Wang, 2026. "Robust Prediction Intervals for Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities: A Comparative Study of Five Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 913-934, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:68:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10574-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le, Trung H., 2020. "Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall with mixed data sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1362-1379.
    2. Hejazi, Seyed Amir & Jackson, Kenneth R., 2016. "A neural network approach to efficient valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 169-181.
    3. Xiaoshan Su & Manying Bai, 2020. "Stochastic gradient boosting frequency-severity model of insurance claims," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-03532512 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Quan, Zhiyu & Gan, Guojun & Valdez, Emiliano, 2022. "Tree-based models for variable annuity valuation: parameter tuning and empirical analysis," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 95-118, March.
    6. Climent, Francisco & Momparler, Alexandre & Carmona, Pedro, 2019. "Anticipating bank distress in the Eurozone: An Extreme Gradient Boosting approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 885-896.
    7. Nawaz, Kishwar & Lahiani, Amine & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Natural resources as blessings and finance-growth nexus: A bootstrap ARDL approach in an emerging economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 277-287.
    8. Gweon, Hyukjun & Li, Shu & Mamon, Rogemar, 2020. "An Effective Bias-Corrected Bagging Method For The Valuation Of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 853-871, September.
    9. Xu, Wei & Chen, Yuehuan & Coleman, Conrad & Coleman, Thomas F., 2018. "Moment matching machine learning methods for risk management of large variable annuity portfolios," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-20.
    10. Guojun Gan & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2018. "Regression Modeling for the Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 40-54, January.
    11. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Muhammad Azhar Khan & Khalid Zaman & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Sameh E. Askar & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro & Ahmad Kabbani, 2021. "Financial development during COVID-19 pandemic: the role of coronavirus testing and functional labs," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Gan, Guojun, 2013. "Application of data clustering and machine learning in variable annuity valuation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 795-801.
    13. Ashok Mishra & Christine Wilson & Robert Williams, 2009. "Factors affecting financial performance of new and beginning farmers," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 69(2), pages 160-179, July.
    14. Ou Dang & Mingbin Feng & Mary R. Hardy, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation for Conditional Tail Expectation of Variable Annuities," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 187-210, April.
    15. Andrew Patton & Dimitris Politis & Halbert White, 2009. "Correction to “Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap” by D. Politis and H. White," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 372-375.
    16. Ben Mingbin Feng & Zhenni Tan & Jiayi Zheng, 2020. "Efficient Simulation Designs for Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 275-289, April.
    17. Seyed Amir Hejazi & Kenneth R. Jackson, 2016. "A Neural Network Approach to Efficient Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities," Papers 1606.07831, arXiv.org.
    18. Kai Liu & Ken Seng Tan, 2021. "Real-Time Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios: A Green Mesh Approach," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 313-333, July.
    19. Ahmed Samour & M. Mine Baskaya & Turgut Tursoy, 2022. "The Impact of Financial Development and FDI on Renewable Energy in the UAE: A Path towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Nusair, Salah A. & Olson, Dennis, 2019. "The effects of oil price shocks on Asian exchange rates: Evidence from quantile regression analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 44-63.
    21. Ashok Mishra & Christine Wilson & Robert Williams, 2009. "Factors affecting financial performance of new and beginning farmers," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 69(2), pages 160-179, July.
    22. Simon C. K. Lee & Sheldon Lin, 2018. "Delta Boosting Machine with Application to General Insurance," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 405-425, July.
    23. Gan, Guojun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2015. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 138-150.
    24. Guojun Gan, 2018. "Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios Using Linear Models with Interactions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wing Fung Chong & Haoen Cui & Yuxuan Li, 2021. "Pseudo-Model-Free Hedging for Variable Annuities via Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2107.03340, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    2. Lim, Hong Beng & Shyamalkumar, Nariankadu D. & Tao, Siyang, 2025. "Valuation of variable annuity portfolios using finite and infinite width neural networks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 269-284.
    3. Jiang, Ruihong & Saunders, David & Weng, Chengguo, 2023. "Two-phase selection of representative contracts for valuation of large variable annuity portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 293-309.
    4. Thorsten Moenig, 2021. "Efficient valuation of variable annuity portfolios with dynamic programming," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(4), pages 1023-1055, December.
    5. Nguyen, Hang & Sherris, Michael & Villegas, Andrés M. & Ziveyi, Jonathan, 2024. "Scenario selection with LASSO regression for the valuation of variable annuity portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 27-43.
    6. Guojun Gan & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2018. "Nested Stochastic Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios: Monte Carlo Simulation and Synthetic Datasets," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Guojun Gan, 2018. "Valuation of Large Variable Annuity Portfolios Using Linear Models with Interactions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Daniel Doyle & Chris Groendyke, 2018. "Using Neural Networks to Price and Hedge Variable Annuity Guarantees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Lin, X. Sheldon & Yang, Shuai, 2020. "Fast and efficient nested simulation for large variable annuity portfolios: A surrogate modeling approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 85-103.
    10. Li, Yuying & Forsyth, Peter A., 2019. "A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 189-204.
    11. Gan, Guojun & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2017. "Modeling partial Greeks of variable annuities with dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 118-134.
    12. Huang, Yiming & Mamon, Rogemar & Xiong, Heng, 2022. "Valuing guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits by a change of numéraire approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-26.
    13. Seyed Amir Hejazi & Kenneth R. Jackson, 2016. "Efficient Valuation of SCR via a Neural Network Approach," Papers 1610.01946, arXiv.org.
    14. Gan Guojun & Valdez Emiliano A., 2017. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios: Monte Carlo simulation and synthetic datasets," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 354-374, December.
    15. Wang, Gu & Zou, Bin, 2021. "Optimal fee structure of variable annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 587-601.
    16. Analena Bruce & Elise Neidecker & Luyue Zheng & Isaac Sohn Leslie & Alexa Wilhelm, 2025. "“A farm is viable if it can keep its head above water”: defining and measuring farm viability for small and mid-sized farms," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 625-641, June.
    17. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter Forsyth & Ray Carroll, 2020. "Optimal Asset Allocation For Outperforming A Stochastic Benchmark Target," Papers 2006.15384, arXiv.org.
    18. Massimo Costabile & Fabio Viviano, 2021. "Modeling the Future Value Distribution of a Life Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Michał Gazdecki & Kamila Grześkowiak, 2025. "Does Financial Power Lead Farmers to Focus More on the Behavioral Factors of Business Relationships with Input Suppliers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Gweon, Hyukjun & Li, Shu, 2021. "Batch mode active learning framework and its application on valuing large variable annuity portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 105-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:68:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10574-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.