Author
Listed:
- Tingting Sun
(Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)
- Haoyuan Wang
(Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)
- Donglin Wang
(Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program)
Abstract
Valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities (VAs) is a well-researched area in the actuarial science field. However, the study of producing reliable prediction intervals for prices has received comparatively less attention. Compared to point prediction, the prediction interval can calculate a reasonable price range of VAs and help investors and insurance companies better manage risk to maintain profitability and sustainability. In this study, we address this gap by utilizing five different models in conjunction with bootstrapping techniques to generate robust prediction intervals for variable annuity prices. Our findings show that the Gradient Boosting regression (GBR) model provides the narrowest intervals compared to the other four models. While the Random sample consensus (RANSAC) model has the highest coverage rate, but it has the widest interval. In practical applications, considering the trade-off between coverage rate and interval width, the GBR model would be a preferred choice. Therefore, we recommend using the gradient boosting model with the bootstrap method to calculate the prediction interval of valuation for a large portfolio of variable annuity policies.
Suggested Citation
Tingting Sun & Haoyuan Wang & Donglin Wang, 2026.
"Robust Prediction Intervals for Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities: A Comparative Study of Five Models,"
Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 913-934, August.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:compec:v:68:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10574-9
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:68:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10574-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.