IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v65y2025i6d10.1007_s10614-024-10682-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Bank Efficiency with Risk Management by Optimal Common Resource and Three-Parallel Two-Stage Dynamic DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Tu

    (Nankai University)

  • Bin Sheng

    (Nankai University)

  • Chien-Heng Tu

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

  • Yung-ho Chiu

    (Soochow University)

Abstract

Taking risk management as an independent department and comparable factor, we set up three parallel departments (credit, risk management, and investment) in a bank. To resolve the problem of common resource allocation, this study is the first to combine the three parallel departments and the optimal common resource allocation in the banking framework. The empirical results show the following. (1) The efficiency and ranking of banks with risk management are better than that without risk management. (2) Banks that share common resources in an optimal way have higher efficiency than banks that share resources in a non-optimal way.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Tu & Bin Sheng & Chien-Heng Tu & Yung-ho Chiu, 2025. "Evaluating Bank Efficiency with Risk Management by Optimal Common Resource and Three-Parallel Two-Stage Dynamic DEA Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(6), pages 3545-3571, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:65:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10682-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10682-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-024-10682-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-024-10682-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:65:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10682-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.