IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jis/ejistu/y2013i02id372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Policy Actors Seek for: Reciprocal Misunderstanding of Objectives of Participatory Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • MIKULSKIENE Birute
  • PITRĖNAITĖ-ŽILĖNIENĖ Birute

Abstract

The goal of this research is to explore different policy actors’ attitudes towards participation in public decision making. The paper examines objectives of external participants’ involvement and compares various participants’ judgements on the process and results of participation. We screened operation of formal networks of participatory decision making at the Lithuanian Ministries of Health and Education & Science. The research revealed the willingness of decision makers to allow different stakeholders to contribute to the solution of problems of diverse character. The results of interviews manifested reciprocal miscommunication towards objectives and results of participatory decision making. Public administrators demonstrated their high willingness to acquire expertise, while external participants sought to present specific interests and got them implemented as well. However, it has to be admitted that decision makers are not committed to the results generated by stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • MIKULSKIENE Birute & PITRĖNAITĖ-ŽILĖNIENĖ Birute, 2013. "What Policy Actors Seek for: Reciprocal Misunderstanding of Objectives of Participatory Decision Making," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2013:i:02:id:372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/files/pdf/372.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ejist.ro/abstract/372/What-Policy-Actors-Seek-for-Reciprocal-Misunderstanding-of-Objectives.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Driessen, Peter P. J. & Glasbergen, Pieter & Verdaas, Co, 2001. "Interactive policy-making - a model of management for public works," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 322-337, January.
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Measurement," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 77-96, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Governance and Governance Networks in Europe," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 505-525, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Kopia & Andreas Kompalla & Melanie Buchmüller & Bastian Heinemann, 2017. "Performance Measurement of Management System Standards Using the Balanced Scorecard," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 981-981.
    2. Onyema E. Ofoegbu, 2014. "The Role of Knowledge Management on Knowledge Management Perfomance: A Case Study of Some Nigerian Banks," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 53-62, May.
    3. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    4. Hideshi Itoh, 2006. "The Theories of International Outsourcing and Integration : A Theoretical Overview from the Perspective of Organizational Economics," Microeconomics Working Papers 21891, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    5. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    6. Duschl, Matthias & Schimke, Antje & Brenner, Thomas & Luxen, Dennis, 2011. "Firm growth and the spatial impact of geolocated external factors: Empirical evidence for German manufacturing firms," Working Paper Series in Economics 36, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    7. Fischer, Caroline, 2020. "Incentives can't buy me knowledge: The missing effects of appreciation and aligned performance appraisals on knowledge sharing of public employees," OSF Preprints u8hfy, Center for Open Science.
    8. Chad Patrizi & Phil Ice & Melissa Burgess, 2013. "Semantic Mapping Of Learning Assets To Align Curriculum And Evidence Learning Effectiveness In Business Education," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 117-128.
    9. Stigson, Peter & Dotzauer, Erik & Yan, Jinyue, 2009. "Improving policy making through government-industry policy learning: The case of a novel Swedish policy framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 399-406, April.
    10. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    11. Pietro Previtali & Eugenio Salvati, 2021. "Area Social Plans and Local Governance of Interorganizational Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Guilherme Frederico, 2017. "Supply Chain Management Maturity: A Comprehensive Framework Proposal from Literature Review and Case Studies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 68-76, January.
    14. Bourguignon, Annick & Saulpic, Olivier & Zarlowski, Philippe, 2006. "Management Accounting Change in the Public Sector: A French Case Study and a New Institutionalist Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 06018, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    15. Muhammad Niqab & Janet Hanson & Arthur Bangert & Sathiamoorthy Kannan & Sailesh Sharma & Abdul Ghaffar & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, 2020. "Measuring Intellectual Capital in Schools in the Developing Country of Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    16. Swaans, Kees & Broerse, Jacqueline & Meincke, Maylin & Mudhara, Maxwell & Bunders, Joske, 2009. "Promoting food security and well-being among poor and HIV/AIDS affected households: Lessons from an interactive and integrated approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 31-42, February.
    17. Foray, Dominique & Lissoni, Francesco, 2010. "University Research and Public–Private Interaction," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 275-314, Elsevier.
    18. Guowen Dai, 2015. "The impact of policy networks on the urbanisation around High-Speed Railway stations in China: the case of Wuhan," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(3), pages 533-551, June.
    19. Helen Lawton Smith, 2017. "Entrepreneurship policies and the development of regional innovation systems: theory, policy and practice," Working Papers 36, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2017.
    20. Claudio Vitari, 2009. "It Dynamic Capability Development In The Context Of Data Genesis Capability," Post-Print hal-00463282, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    interest representation; stakeholders; participatory framework; policy making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2013:i:02:id:372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Popescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.