IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2022v13p148-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A composite indicator for economic integration maturity: the case of Western Balkan countries

Author

Listed:
  • Viktória ENDRÅ DI-KOVà CS

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Oleg TANKOVSKI

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Montenegro and Serbia are on track to join the EU, followed by other Western Balkan countries. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate these countries' economic integration maturity. The analysis covers the period between 2006 and 2019. The main questions concern the evolution of Western Balkan countries during the last 15 years, the results that have already been achieved, and the weakest points of their potential accession. The paper suggests that, although these countries are about to fulfil the economic criteria, they are not fully prepared to join the EU from an economic perspective as they face significant challenges in terms of integration maturity. To endorse this suggestion, the paper forms a new composite indicator to provide a comprehensive understanding of the recent development of these countries' functioning market economy, competitiveness, macroeconomic stability, convergence, and financing ability. Results can contribute to the integration theory and enlargement decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktória ENDRÅ DI-KOVà CS & Oleg TANKOVSKI, 2022. "A composite indicator for economic integration maturity: the case of Western Balkan countries," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 148-166, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2022:v:13:p:148-166
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2022-0107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2022_1301_END.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2022-0107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viner, Jacob, 2014. "The Customs Union Issue," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199756124 edited by Oslington, Paul.
    2. Alberto Alesina & Roberto Perotti, 2004. "The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 27-48, Fall.
    3. Dzenita Siljak & Sándor Gyula Nagy, 2018. "The Effects of the Crisis on the Convergence Process of the Western Balkan Countries towards the European Union," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 40(1), pages 105-124, March.
    4. Aneta Krstevska, 2018. "Real Convergence of Western Balkan Countries to European Union in view of Macroeconomic Policy Mix," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 7(2), pages 187-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria V. Sokolova, 2016. "Trade Re(Im)Balanced: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements," IHEID Working Papers 06-2016, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    2. Floriana Cerniglia & Laura Pagani, 2007. "The allocation of competences between the European Union and the Member States: an analysis of the determinants of Europeans’ preferences," Working Papers 118, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 2007.
    3. Benner, Joachim & Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Scheide, Joachim, 2005. "Euroland: Recovery is slowly gaining momentum," Kiel Economic Policy Papers 3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Alberto Alesina & Silvia Ardagna & Vincenzo Galasso, 2011. "The Euro and Structural Reforms," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 2(1).
    5. Cem Saatcioglu & Kaan Celikok, 2023. "European Regional Integration and its Partnership with T rkiye: An Assessment of the Specific Customs Union," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 184-198, January.
    6. Sjef Ederveen & George Gelauff & Jacques Pelkmans, 2008. "Assessing Subsidiarity," Springer Books, in: George Gelauff & Isabel Grilo & Arjan Lejour (ed.), Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe, chapter 2, pages 19-40, Springer.
    7. My Duong & Mark J. Holmes & Anna Strutt & Steven Lim, 2019. "Effects of Trade Agreements and Foreign Direct Investment on Trade: Evidence from Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 116-126.
    8. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5101 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Meixing Dai & Claire Mainguy & Jamel Saadaoui & Moïse Sidiropoulos & Isabelle Terraz & Jamel Trabelsi, 2021. "Towards a more resilient European Union after the COVID-19 crisis," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 321-348, June.
    10. Aleberto Alesina & Guido Tabellini & Francesco Trebbi, 2017. "Is Europe an Optimal Political Area?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 169-234.
    11. Campoy Juan Cristóbal & Negrete Juan C., 2010. "Structural Reforms and Budget Deficits in a Monetary Union: A Strategic Approach," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Alberto Alesina & Ignazio Angeloni & Federico Etro, 2005. "International Unions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(3), pages 602-615, June.
    13. Muhammad Ibrahim Shah, 2021. "Investigating the Role of Regional Economic Integration on Growth: Fresh Insights from South Asia," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 13(1), pages 35-57, January.
    14. Godefroy Dang Nguyen & Maya Jollès, 2005. "Does the European Union Create the Foundations of an Information Society for All?," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 11, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5284 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2008. "How to Deal with Economic Divergences in the EMU?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Jesús Ferreiro & Giuseppe Fontana & Felipe Serrano (ed.), Fiscal Policy in the European Union, chapter 7, pages 157-183, Palgrave Macmillan.
    17. Granville, Brigitte & Mallick, Sushanta, 2009. "Monetary and financial stability in the euro area: Pro-cyclicality versus trade-off," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 662-674, October.
    18. Takumi Naito, 2021. "Trade diversion is reversed in the long run," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 39, pages 202-219, January.
    19. Gács, János, 2005. "A lisszaboni folyamat - egy hosszú távú stratégia rejtélyei, elméleti problémái és gyakorlati nehézségei [The Lisbon Process: puzzles, theoretical problems and practical difficulties of a long-term," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 205-230.
    20. Enrico Spolaore, 2013. "What Is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 125-144, Summer.
    21. Enrico Spolaore, 2013. "What Is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 125-144, Summer.
    22. Enn Lun Yong, 2019. "Unemployment and the European Union, 2000–2017: structural exploration of distant past economic experience and future prosperity," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2022:v:13:p:148-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.