IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v50y2016i2p424-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Lucio Bianco

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata,” 00133 Roma, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Caramia

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata,” 00133 Roma, Italy)

  • Stefano Giordani

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata,” 00133 Roma, Italy)

  • Veronica Piccialli

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ingegneria Informatica, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata,” 00133 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

In this paper, we study a novel toll setting policy to regulate hazardous material (hazmat) transportation, where the regulator (e.g., a government authority) aims at minimizing not only the network total risk but also at spreading the risk in an equitable way over a given road network. The idea is to use a toll setting policy to discourage carriers transporting hazmat from overloading portions of the network with the consequent increase of the risk exposure of the population involved. Specifically, we assume that the toll paid by a carrier on a network link depends on the usage of that link by all carriers. Therefore the route choices of each carrier depend on the other carrier’s choices, and the tolls deter the carriers from using links with a high total risk. The resulting model is a mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) problem, where the inner problem is a Nash equilibrium problem (game) having as players the carriers, each one wishing to minimize his or her travel cost (including tolls); the outer problem is addressed by the government authority, whose aim is finding the link tolls that induce the carriers to choose route plans that minimize both the network total risk and the maximum link total risk among the network links (to address risk equity). To guarantee the stability of the solution, we study conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium, and propose a local search heuristic for the MPEC problem. Computational results are carried out on a real road network, comparing the performance of our toll setting policy with the toll setting approach proposed in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Veronica Piccialli, 2016. "A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 424-438, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:424-438
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2015.0592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. C. Hu & Andrew B. Kahng & Chung-Wen Albert Tsao, 1995. "Old Bachelor Acceptance: A New Class of Non-Monotone Threshold Accepting Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 417-425, November.
    2. Patrice Marcotte & Anne Mercier & Gilles Savard & Vedat Verter, 2009. "Toll Policies for Mitigating Hazardous Materials Transport Risk," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 228-243, May.
    3. Hanif D. Sherali & Allen L. Soyster & Frederic H. Murphy, 1983. "Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot Equilibria: Characterizations and Computations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 253-276, April.
    4. Akgun, Vedat & Erkut, Erhan & Batta, Rajan, 2000. "On finding dissimilar paths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 232-246, March.
    5. Ram Gopalan & Krishna S. Kolluri & Rajan Batta & Mark H. Karwan, 1990. "Modeling Equity of Risk in the Transportation of Hazardous Materials," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 961-973, December.
    6. Jiashan Wang & Yingying Kang & Changhyun Kwon & Rajan Batta, 2012. "Dual Toll Pricing for Hazardous Materials Transport with Linear Delay," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 147-165, March.
    7. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    8. Laurel Lindner-Dutton & Rajan Batta & Mark H. Karwan, 1991. "Equitable Sequencing of a Given Set of Hazardous Materials Shipments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 124-137, May.
    9. Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani, 2009. "On the selection of k efficient paths by clustering techniques," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 237-260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2018. "Benders decomposition for the Hazmat Transport Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 996-1002.
    2. Xiaoyan Jia & Ruichun He & Chunmin Zhang & Huo Chai, 2018. "A Bi-Level Programming Model of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transportation Operation for Urban Road Network by Period-Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Bhavsar, Nishit & Verma, Manish, 2022. "A subsidy policy to managing hazmat risk in railroad transportation network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 633-646.
    4. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    5. Tolou Esfandeh & Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon, 2018. "Time-Dependent Hazardous-Materials Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 454-473, March.
    6. Fang, Kan & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2017. "A routing and scheduling approach to rail transportation of hazardous materials with demand due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 154-168.
    7. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    8. Liping Liu & Jiaming Li & Lei Zhou & Tijun Fan & Shuxia Li, 2021. "Research on Route Optimization of Hazardous Materials Transportation Considering Risk Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 316-333.
    2. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    3. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    5. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2015. "The maximin HAZMAT routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 15-27.
    6. Fang, Kan & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2017. "A routing and scheduling approach to rail transportation of hazardous materials with demand due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 154-168.
    7. Liping Liu & Jiaming Li & Lei Zhou & Tijun Fan & Shuxia Li, 2021. "Research on Route Optimization of Hazardous Materials Transportation Considering Risk Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    9. Magnus Hoffmann & Grégoire Rota‐Graziosi, 2020. "Endogenous timing in the presence of non‐monotonicities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 359-402, February.
    10. Lina Mallozzi & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Entropic Regularization in Hierarchical Games," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Paul Berglund & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Robust Facility Location Problem for Hazardous Waste Transportation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 91-116, March.
    12. Onur Tavaslıoğlu & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2019. "Solving Stochastic and Bilevel Mixed-Integer Programs via a Generalized Value Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1659-1677, November.
    13. Lv, Chengwei & Xu, Jiuping & Xie, Heping & Zeng, Ziqiang & Wu, Yimin, 2016. "Equilibrium strategy based coal blending method for combined carbon and PM10 emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1035-1052.
    14. Ditta, A. & Figueroa, O. & Galindo, G. & Yie-Pinedo, R., 2019. "A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    16. Juan S. Borrero & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Denis Sauré, 2019. "Sequential Interdiction with Incomplete Information and Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 72-89, January.
    17. Bhavsar, Nishit & Verma, Manish, 2022. "A subsidy policy to managing hazmat risk in railroad transportation network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 633-646.
    18. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2018. "Benders decomposition for the Hazmat Transport Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 996-1002.
    19. Talarico, L. & Sörensen, K. & Springael, J., 2015. "The k-dissimilar vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 129-140.
    20. Esfandeh, Tolou & Kwon, Changhyun & Batta, Rajan, 2016. "Regulating hazardous materials transportation by dual toll pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 20-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:424-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.