IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i6p2233-2248.html

The Basic Core of a Parallel Machines Scheduling Game

Author

Listed:
  • Tzvi Alon

    (Department of Statistics and Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501 Jerusalem, Israel)

  • Shoshana Anily

    (Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider the parallel machine scheduling (PMS) under job-splitting game defined by a set of manufacturers where each holds uniform parallel machines and each is committed to produce some jobs submitted to her by her clients while bearing the cost of the sum of completion times of her jobs on her machines. An efficient algorithm for this scheduling problem is well known. We consider the corresponding cooperative game, where the manufacturers are players that want to join forces. We show that collaboration is profitable. Yet, the stability of the cooperation depends on the cost allocation scheme; we focus on the core of the game. Methodology/results : We prove that the PMS game is totally balanced and its core is infinitely large, by developing a sophisticated methodology of linear complexity that finds a line segment in its symmetric core. We call this segment the basic core of the game. Managerial implications : This PMS game has the potential for various applications both in traditional industry and in distributed computing systems in the hi-tech industry. The formation of a partnership among entrepreneurs, companies, or manufacturers necessitates not only a plan for joining forces toward the achievement of the ultimate goals, but also an acceptable agreement regarding the cost allocation among the partners. Core allocations guarantee the stability of the partnership as no subset of players can gain by defecting from the grand coalition.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzvi Alon & Shoshana Anily, 2023. "The Basic Core of a Parallel Machines Scheduling Game," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2233-2248, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2233-2248
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curiel, I. & Potters, J.A.M. & Rajendra Prasad, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Veltman, B., 1994. "Sequencing and cooperation," Other publications TiSEM be67f9e9-7a4a-47f1-9fb9-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Hervé Moulin, 2007. "On Scheduling Fees to Prevent Merging, Splitting, and Transferring of Jobs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 266-283, May.
    3. Slikker, Marco, 2006. "Balancedness of multiple machine sequencing games revisited," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1944-1949, November.
    4. Jiawei Zhang, 2009. "Cost Allocation for Joint Replenishment Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 146-156, February.
    5. Paolo Serafini, 1996. "Scheduling Jobs on Several Machines with the Job Splitting Property," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 617-628, August.
    6. Imma Curiel & Jos Potters & Rajendra Prasad & Stef Tijs & Bart Veltman, 1994. "Sequencing and Cooperation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 566-568, June.
    7. Hamers, Herbert & Suijs, Jeroen & Tijs, Stef & Borm, Peter, 1996. "The Split Core for Sequencing Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 165-176, August.
    8. Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Suijs, Jeroen, 1999. "On the balancedness of multiple machine sequencing games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 678-691, December.
    9. Wayne E. Smith, 1956. "Various optimizers for single‐stage production," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 59-66, March.
    10. Yimin Yu & Saif Benjaafar & Yigal Gerchak, 2015. "Capacity Sharing and Cost Allocation among Independent Firms with Congestion," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1285-1310, August.
    11. Moulin, Hervé, 2008. "Proportional scheduling, split-proofness, and merge-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 567-587, July.
    12. Nait Tahar, Djamel & Yalaoui, Farouk & Chu, Chengbin & Amodeo, Lionel, 2006. "A linear programming approach for identical parallel machine scheduling with job splitting and sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 63-73, February.
    13. Shoshana Anily & Moshe Haviv, 2010. "Cooperation in Service Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 660-673, June.
    14. Shoshana Anily, 2018. "Full characterization of the nonnegative core of some cooperative games," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(4), pages 303-316, June.
    15. Shoshana Anily & Moshe Haviv, 2007. "The Cost Allocation Problem for the First Order Interaction Joint Replenishment Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 292-302, April.
    16. Tijs, S.H. & Parthasarathy, T. & Potters, J.A.M. & Rajendra Prasad, V., 1984. "Permutation games : Another class of totally balanced games," Other publications TiSEM a7edfa18-6224-4be3-b677-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atay, Ata & Trudeau, Christian, 2026. "Optimistic and pessimistic approaches for cooperative games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(2), pages 725-733.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Velzen, S. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2002. "On the Balancedness of Relaxed Sequencing Games," Discussion Paper 2002-49, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. van Velzen, S. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2002. "On the Balancedness of Relaxed Sequencing Games," Other publications TiSEM 14e21ac6-26af-438e-943b-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Bas Velzen, 2005. "On the Convexity of Precedence Sequencing Games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 161-175, July.
    4. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Bas van Velzen, 2002. "On Games corresponding to Sequencing Situations with Precedence Relations," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 553.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    5. Atay, Ata & Trudeau, Christian, 2024. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 104-125.
    6. Imma Curiel, 2010. "Multi-stage sequencing situations," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 39(1), pages 151-162, March.
    7. Slikker, Marco, 2023. "The stable gain splitting rule for sequencing situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 902-913.
    8. Schouten, Jop & Saavedra-Nieves, Alejandro & Fiestras-Janeiro, G., 2020. "Sequencing Situations and Games with Non-Linear Cost Functions," Other publications TiSEM 3e1db5c9-0f77-4f91-a075-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Schouten, Jop & Saavedra-Nieves, Alejandro & Fiestras-Janeiro, G., 2020. "Sequencing Situations and Games with Non-Linear Cost Functions," Discussion Paper 2020-006, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Sreoshi Banerjee & Christian Trudeau, 2025. "The accountable function: a new approach to scheduling problems," Working Papers 2507, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    11. Hanlin Liu & Yimin Yu & Saif Benjaafar & Huihui Wang, 2022. "Price-Directed Cost Sharing and Demand Allocation Among Service Providers with Multiple Demand Sources and Multiple Facilities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 647-663, January.
    12. Fragnelli, V. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Tijs, S.H., 2006. "Convex Games with Countable Number of Players and Sequencing Situations," Discussion Paper 2006-119, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Banerjee, Sreoshi & Trudeau, Christian, 2026. "Queueing and Scheduling Problems with Multiple Servers," MPRA Paper 128053, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pedro Calleja & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2002. "On a New Class of Parallel Sequencing Situations and Related Games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 265-277, January.
    15. Min Ji & Sai Liu & Xiaolin Zhang & Keke Cao & T. C. E. Cheng, 2017. "Sequencing Games with Slack Due Windows and Group Technology Considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 121-133, February.
    16. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    17. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Discussion Paper 2007-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Atay, Ata & Calleja, Pedro & Soteras, Sergio, 2021. "Open shop scheduling games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 12-21.
    19. Jennifer K. Ryan & Lusheng Shao & Daewon Sun, 2022. "Contracting Mechanisms for Stable Sourcing Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2558-2576, September.
    20. Davila-Pena, Laura & Borm, Peter & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & Schouten, Jop, 2023. "An Allocation Rule for Graph Machine Scheduling Problems," Discussion Paper 2023-009, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2233-2248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.