IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i5p1966-1983.html

Optimal Electricity Imbalance Pricing for the Emerging Penetration of Renewable and Low-Cost Generators

Author

Listed:
  • Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal

    (Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

  • Rodrigo Belo

    (Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de 2775-405 Carcavelos, Portugal)

  • Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Derek Bunn

    (London Business School, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Problem definition : With the rise of renewables and the decline of fossil fuels, electricity markets are shifting toward a capacity mix in which low-cost generators (LCGs) are dominant. Within this transition, policymakers have been considering whether current market designs are still fundamentally fit for purpose. This research analyses a key aspect: the design of real-time imbalance pricing mechanisms. Currently, markets mostly use either single pricing or dual pricing as their imbalance pricing mechanisms. Single-pricing mechanisms apply identical prices for buying and selling, whereas dual-pricing mechanisms use different prices. The recent harmonization initiative in Europe sets single pricing as the default and dual pricing as the exception. This leaves open the question of when dual pricing is advantageous. We compare the economic efficiency of two dual-pricing mechanisms in current practice with that of a single-pricing design and identify conditions under which dual pricing can be beneficial. We also prove the existence of an optimal pricing mechanism. Methodology/results : We first analytically compare the economic efficiency of single-pricing and dual-pricing mechanisms. Furthermore, we formulate an optimal pricing mechanism that can deter the potential exercise of market power by LCGs. Our analytical results characterize the conditions under which a dual pricing is advantageous over a single pricing. We further compare the economic efficiency of these mechanisms with respect to our proposed optimal mechanism through simulations. We show that the proposed pricing mechanism would be the most efficient in comparison with others and discuss its practicability. Managerial implications : Our analytical comparison reveals market conditions under which each pricing mechanism is a better fit and whether there is a need for a redesign. In particular, our results suggest that existing pricing mechanisms are adequate at low/moderate market shares of LCGs but not for the high levels currently envisaged by policymakers in the transition to decarbonization, where the optimal pricing mechanism will become more attractive.

Suggested Citation

  • Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal & Rodrigo Belo & Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh & Derek Bunn, 2023. "Optimal Electricity Imbalance Pricing for the Emerging Penetration of Renewable and Low-Cost Generators," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1966-1983, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:5:p:1966-1983
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0555
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Maqbool Dada, 1999. "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 183-194, April.
    2. Majid Al-Gwaiz & Xiuli Chao & Owen Q. Wu, 2017. "Understanding How Generation Flexibility and Renewable Energy Affect Power Market Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 114-131, February.
    3. Hesamzadeh, M.R. & Biggar, D.R. & Bunn, D.W. & Moiseeva, E., 2020. "The impact of generator market power on the electricity hedge market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Heikki Peura & Derek W. Bunn, 2021. "Renewable Power and Electricity Prices: The Impact of Forward Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4772-4788, August.
    5. Yao, Jian & Oren, Shmuel S. & Adler, Ilan, 2007. "Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and Cournot generation firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1279-1296, September.
    6. Clò, Stefano & Fumagalli, Elena, 2019. "The effect of price regulation on energy imbalances: A Difference in Differences design," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 754-764.
    7. Vandezande, Leen & Meeus, Leonardo & Belmans, Ronnie & Saguan, Marcelo & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2010. "Well-functioning balancing markets: A prerequisite for wind power integration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3146-3154, July.
    8. Akshaya Jha & Frank A. Wolak, 2019. "Can Financial Participants Improve Price Discovery and Efficiency in Multi-Settlement Markets with Trading Costs?," NBER Working Papers 25851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Fares, Robert L. & Webber, Michael E., 2014. "A flexible model for economic operational management of grid battery energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 768-776.
    10. Celebi, Metin & Hajos, Attila & Hanser, Philip Q, 2010. "Virtual Bidding: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 16-25, June.
    11. van der Veen, Reinier A.C. & Abbasy, Alireza & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2012. "Agent-based analysis of the impact of the imbalance pricing mechanism on market behavior in electricity balancing markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 874-881.
    12. Jae Ho Kim & Warren B. Powell, 2011. "Optimal Energy Commitments with Storage and Intermittent Supply," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1347-1360, December.
    13. Francesco Lisi & Enrico Edoli, 2018. "Analyzing and Forecasting Zonal Imbalance Signs in the Italian Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(5), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Koichiro Ito & Mar Reguant, 2016. "Sequential Markets, Market Power, and Arbitrage," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1921-1957, July.
    15. Rajnish Kamat & Shmuel Oren, 2004. "Two-settlement Systems for Electricity Markets under Network Uncertainty and Market Power," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-37, January.
    16. Allaz, Blaise, 1992. "Oligopoly, uncertainty and strategic forward transactions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 297-308, June.
    17. Severin Borenstein, 2002. "The Trouble With Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 191-211, Winter.
    18. Daniel R. Jiang & Warren B. Powell, 2015. "Optimal Hour-Ahead Bidding in the Real-Time Electricity Market with Battery Storage Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 525-543, August.
    19. Blaise Allaz, 1992. "Oligopoly, uncertainty and strategic forward transactions," Post-Print hal-00511812, HAL.
    20. Nicola Secomandi, 2010. "Optimal Commodity Trading with a Capacitated Storage Asset," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 449-467, March.
    21. Juan M. Morales & Antonio J. Conejo & Henrik Madsen & Pierre Pinson & Marco Zugno, 2014. "Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-9411-9, May.
    22. Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2014. "When energy storage reduces social welfare," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 106-116.
    23. repec:aen:journl:ej42-5-bunn is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Owen Q. Wu & Roman Kapuscinski, 2013. "Curtailing Intermittent Generation in Electrical Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 578-595, October.
    25. George Liberopoulos & Panagiotis Andrianesis, 2016. "Critical Review of Pricing Schemes in Markets with Non-Convex Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 17-31, February.
    26. Blaise Allaz & Jean-Luc Vila, 1993. "Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency," Post-Print hal-00511806, HAL.
    27. John R. Birge & Ali Hortaçsu & J. Michael Pavlin, 2017. "Inverse Optimization for the Recovery of Market Structure from Market Outcomes: An Application to the MISO Electricity Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 837-855, August.
    28. Weber, Christoph, 2010. "Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3155-3163, July.
    29. repec:aen:journl:ej39-5-lisi is not listed on IDEAS
    30. Nur Sunar & John R. Birge, 2019. "Strategic Commitment to a Production Schedule with Uncertain Supply and Demand: Renewable Energy in Day-Ahead Electricity Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 714-734, February.
    31. Derek W. Bunn & Stefan O.E. Kermer, 2021. "Statistical Arbitrage and Information Flow in an Electricity Balancing Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(5), pages 19-40, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikseresht, Ali, 2025. "Dynamic hydrogen demand forecasting using hybrid time series models: Insights for renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Rui Huang & Qinglong Gou & Juzhi Zhang, 2026. "Participation of Variable Renewable Generators in Forward Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis," The Energy Journal, , vol. 47(1), pages 165-192, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoshan Peng & Owen Q. Wu & Gilvan C. Souza, 2024. "Renewable, Flexible, and Storage Capacities: Friends or Foes?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1730-1749, September.
    2. Zuguang Gao & Khaled Alshehri & John R. Birge, 2024. "Aggregating Distributed Energy Resources: Efficiency and Market Power," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 834-852, May.
    3. Lingchunzi Li & Haijun Wang & Xin Yan & Yiwen Bian, 2026. "Forward contracting and spot trading in electricity markets," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 509-553, April.
    4. Heikki Peura & Derek W. Bunn, 2021. "Renewable Power and Electricity Prices: The Impact of Forward Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4772-4788, August.
    5. Yao, Jian & Oren, Shmuel S. & Adler, Ilan, 2007. "Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and Cournot generation firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1279-1296, September.
    6. Dana G. Popescu & Sridhar Seshadri, 2013. "Demand Uncertainty and Excess Supply in Commodity Contracting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(9), pages 2135-2152, September.
    7. Javad Khazaei & Golbon Zakeri & Shmuel S. Oren, 2017. "Single and Multisettlement Approaches to Market Clearing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1147-1164, October.
    8. Yangfang (Helen) Zhou & Alan Scheller‐Wolf & Nicola Secomandi & Stephen Smith, 2019. "Managing Wind‐Based Electricity Generation in the Presence of Storage and Transmission Capacity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 970-989, April.
    9. Jerry Anunrojwong & Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Bolun Xu, 2024. "Battery Operations in Electricity Markets: Strategic Behavior and Distortions," Papers 2406.18685, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    10. Frederic H. Murphy & Yves Smeers, 2005. "Generation Capacity Expansion in Imperfectly Competitive Restructured Electricity Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 646-661, August.
    11. Jian Yao & Ilan Adler & Shmuel S. Oren, 2008. "Modeling and Computing Two-Settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 34-47, February.
    12. Alessio Trivella & Danial Mohseni-Taheri & Selvaprabu Nadarajah, 2023. "Meeting Corporate Renewable Power Targets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 491-512, January.
    13. Arega Getaneh Abate & Rossana Riccardi & Carlos Ruiz, 2022. "Contract design in electricity markets with high penetration of renewables: A two-stage approach," Papers 2201.09927, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    14. Miguel Vazquez, 2012. "Analysis of the strategic use of forward contracting in electricity markets," RSCAS Working Papers 2012/13, European University Institute.
    15. Lina Silva-Rodriguez & Anibal Sanjab & Elena Fumagalli & Ana Virag & Madeleine Gibescu, 2020. "Short Term Electricity Market Designs: Identified Challenges and Promising Solutions," Papers 2011.04587, arXiv.org.
    16. Biswas, Subhojit & Çavdar, Bahar & Garcia, Alfredo & Geunes, Joseph, 2025. "The price of flexibility in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Hesamzadeh, M.R. & Biggar, D.R. & Bunn, D.W. & Moiseeva, E., 2020. "The impact of generator market power on the electricity hedge market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Karakoyun, Ece Cigdem & Avci, Harun & Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Nadar, Emre, 2023. "Deviations from commitments: Markov decision process formulations for the role of energy storage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Agostino Capponi & Garud Iyengar & Bo Yang & Daniel Bienstock, 2025. "Virtual Trading in Multi-Settlement Electricity Markets," Papers 2508.11979, arXiv.org.
    20. Ekaterina Abramova & Derek Bunn, 2021. "Optimal Daily Trading of Battery Operations Using Arbitrage Spreads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:5:p:1966-1983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.