IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i3p903-920.html

Better Together! The Consumer Implications of Delivery Consolidation

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Wagner

    (Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics, University Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Eduard Calvo

    (IESE Business School, University of Navarra, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Pedro Amorim

    (INESC TEC, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Problem definition : Online retailers often receive customer orders comprising several products of differing origins. To fulfill these orders, retailers must ship multiple parcels from different locations and—unless they are grouped somewhere along the supply chain—these may reach the customer’s doorstep one by one. Academic/practical relevance : We conjecture here that receiving products sequentially instead of all together affects a consumer’s reaction to her purchases, possibly influencing—for good or ill—her decision to return products, as well as her overall service satisfaction. We use two-year granular data from an online fashion marketplace to test this hypothesis and characterize consumer behavioral responses to delivery consolidation and examine how it impacts supply chain stakeholders. Methodology : To achieve causal inference, we exploit the fact that the couriers used by the focal marketplace gather together certain parcels for reasons related more to the timing of their arrival than their actual customers, thereby exogenously consolidating the delivery of some orders. We construct a balanced sample of matched twin multiproduct orders that are alike in all respects except their delivery: consolidated (all parcels delivered jointly) versus otherwise (split). Results : We find that delivery consolidation benefits the marketplace and all its suppliers. By eliminating the stress associated with split deliveries, delivery consolidation pleases consumers as it leads to fewer returns and higher overall satisfaction. Managerial implications : Delivering all products in an order together, even if later, reduces the probability of a return, which improves the financial performance of the marketplace and its suppliers and reduces reverse logistics. Our results suggest that in our context, delivery speed matters less than the convenience of receiving all ordered goods in a single delivery, and we provide directions for adapting logistics strategies accordingly. Our empirical findings also imply that the return decisions of multiple products purchased at once should not be considered to be independent. Finding tractable ways of modeling this feature will be necessary in further driving retail practice through theoretical research that accounts for the behavioral implications of delivery consolidation when optimizing fulfillment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Wagner & Eduard Calvo & Pedro Amorim, 2023. "Better Together! The Consumer Implications of Delivery Consolidation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 903-920, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:903-920
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.1200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.1200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhi-Long Chen & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2005. "Integrated Scheduling of Production and Distribution Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 614-628, April.
    2. Ping Josephine Xu & Russell Allgor & Stephen C. Graves, 2009. "Benefits of Reevaluating Real-Time Order Fulfillment Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 340-355, January.
    3. Jason Acimovic & Stephen C. Graves, 2015. "Making Better Fulfillment Decisions on the Fly in an Online Retail Environment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 34-51, February.
    4. Martin, James & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Dawes, John & Tanusondjaja, Arry & Cohen, Justin & McColl, Bruce & Trinh, Giang, 2020. "Fundamental basket size patterns and their relation to retailer performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Jifeng Luo & Ying Rong & Huan Zheng, 2020. "Impacts of logistics information on sales: Evidence from Alibaba," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 646-669, December.
    6. John A. List, 2002. "Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1636-1643, December.
    7. Cassie Mogilner & Baba Shiv & Sheena S. Iyengar, 2013. "Eternal Quest for the Best: Sequential (vs. Simultaneous) Option Presentation Undermines Choice Commitment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1300-1312.
    8. Ho, Daniel E. & Imai, Kosuke & King, Gary & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2007. "Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 199-236, July.
    9. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jörg Claussen & Maria A. Halbinger & Lior Zalmanson, 2026. "Challenge Accepted: The Effects of Contest Participation on a User-Generated Content Community," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 421-439, March.
    2. Li, Zonghuo & Chen, Xiangfeng & Li, Shanliang, 2025. "Delivery timeliness disclosure strategy in platform-based instant retail industries: Understanding the effect of consumer loss aversion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Lu Zhen & Jiajing Gao & Shuaian Wang & Gilbert Laporte & Xiaohang Yue, 2025. "Optimizing an On-Demand Delivery Mode Based on Trucks and Drones," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1008-1031, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cappelletti, Matilde & Giuffrida, Leonardo M., 2022. "Targeted bidders in government tenders," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Credit, Kevin, 2025. "The Impact of Light Rail Construction on Regional On-Road CO2 Emissions Per Capita," OSF Preprints euyj6_v2, Center for Open Science.
    3. Xueqi Wu & Zhi‐Long Chen, 2022. "Fulfillment scheduling for buy‐online‐pickup‐in‐store orders," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2982-3003, July.
    4. Stefanus Jasin & Amitabh Sinha, 2015. "An LP-Based Correlated Rounding Scheme for Multi-Item Ecommerce Order Fulfillment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1336-1351, December.
    5. Ghosh Debashis & Wang Lei, 2026. "Generalized coarsened confounding for causal effects: a large-sample framework," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21.
    6. Goller, Daniel & Lechner, Michael & Moczall, Andreas & Wolff, Joachim, 2020. "Does the estimation of the propensity score by machine learning improve matching estimation? The case of Germany's programmes for long term unemployed," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Jordan Rickles, 2016. "A Review of Propensity Score Analysis: Fundamentals and Developments," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(1), pages 109-114, February.
    8. Lars Isenhardt & Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Tenant Favoritism and Right of First Refusals in Farmland Auctions: Competition and Price Effects," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 302-324.
    9. Gerhard Krug, 2017. "Augmenting propensity score equations to avoid misspecification bias – Evidence from a Monte Carlo simulation [Erweiterung der Propensity Score Gleichung zur Vermeidung von Fehlspezifikationen? Eine Monte Carlo Simulation]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 11(3), pages 205-231, December.
    10. Junho Choi, 2025. "On the role of the design phase in a linear regression," Papers 2509.01861, arXiv.org.
    11. Takasaki, Yoshito, 2020. "Impacts of disability on poverty: Quasi-experimental evidence from landmine amputees in Cambodia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 85-107.
    12. Yuri Ostrovsky & Garnett Picot, 2021. "Innovation in immigrant-owned firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1857-1874, December.
    13. Cheng, Lihong & Guo, Xiaolong & Li, Xiaoxiao & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Data-driven ordering and transshipment decisions for online retailers and logistics service providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Andre Rossi Oliveira, 2024. "Evaluating the Short-term Causal Effect of Early Alert on Student Performance," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(7), pages 1395-1419, November.
    15. Gary King & Christopher Lucas & Richard A. Nielsen, 2017. "The Balance‐Sample Size Frontier in Matching Methods for Causal Inference," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 473-489, April.
    16. Jiu, Song & Wang, Dan & Ma, Zujun, 2024. "Benders decomposition for robust distribution network design and operations in online retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1069-1082.
    17. España, F. & Arriagada, R. & Melo, O. & Foster, W., 2022. "Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. Mishra, Gouri Shankar & Clewlow, Regina R. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Widaman, Keith F., 2015. "The effect of carsharing on vehicle holdings and travel behavior: A propensity score and causal mediation analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 46-55.
    19. Yoshito Takasaki, 2019. "Disability and Poverty: Landmine Amputees in Cambodia," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1118, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    20. Fukui Hideki, 2023. "Evaluating Different Covariate Balancing Methods: A Monte Carlo Simulation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 205-326, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:903-920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.