IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p737-755.html

Lemons, Trade-Ins, and Certified Pre-Owned Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Ximin (Natalie) Huang

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454)

  • Atalay Atasu

    (Technology and Operations Management Area, INSEAD, Fontainebleau 77300, France)

  • Necati Tereyağoğlu

    (Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208)

  • L. Beril Toktay

    (Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308)

Abstract

Problem definition : We study the economic rationale for certified pre-owned (CPO) programs and characterize the mechanism through which they influence secondary markets to create value for durable goods firms and consumers. Academic/practical relevance : Our study on understanding the market impact of CPO programs is highly relevant for industry given their prevalence in practice. Our work also contributes to the adverse selection literature in the context of the “lemons problem” by uncovering the mechanism underpinning CPO programs and how they improve market efficiency. Methodology : We use a game-theoretic durable goods model that captures CPO program features to identify how CPO programs improve market efficiency. We further investigate how CPO program size, as determined by program qualification criteria, plays a role in improving market efficiency. Results : We show that the mechanism underpinning CPO programs consists of two mutually reinforcing effects: a more effective segmentation of used product buyers through high- and low-quality product differentiation and a higher trade-in discount to used product owners. The former effect generates a higher revenue, which, in turn, allows for a higher trade-in discount. This translates to more high-quality products being traded in, more new products being purchased, and more used products being sold in the secondary market (i.e., increased market efficiency). We also show that these two effects are strengthened as the CPO program size increases. Finally, we test hypotheses deriving from our theoretical results in the context of the U.S. automotive industry. Our empirical findings are consistent with the conclusions of our theoretical work. Managerial implications : Durable goods firms can proactively manage their CPO programs by appropriately setting trade-in discounts and managing price discrimination between CPO and non-CPO products. CPO program qualification criteria can be used to alter CPO program size and, hence, the level of market efficiency improvement induced by these choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & Necati Tereyağoğlu & L. Beril Toktay, 2023. "Lemons, Trade-Ins, and Certified Pre-Owned Programs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 737-755, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:737-755
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1176
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Ackere, Ann & Reyniers, Diane J., 1993. "A rationale for trade-ins," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Johnson, Justin P & Waldman, Michael, 2003. "Leasing, Lemons, and Buybacks," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(2), pages 247-265, Summer.
    3. Arif Sultan, 2010. "Lemons and certified pre-owned cars in the used car market," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 45-50, January.
    4. Grossman, Sanford J, 1981. "The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(3), pages 461-483, December.
    5. Wiener, Joshua Lyle, 1985. "Are Warranties Accurate Signals of Product Reliability?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 245-250, September.
    6. Robert H. Porter & Peter Sattler, 1999. "Patterns of Trade in the Market for Used Durables: Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 7149, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Yongbo Xiao & Sean X. Zhou, 2020. "Trade‐in for Cash or for Upgrade? Dynamic Pricing with Customer Choice," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 856-881, April.
    8. Leland, Hayne E, 1979. "Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(6), pages 1328-1346, December.
    9. Raghunath Singh Rao & Om Narasimhan & George John, 2009. "Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 950-967, 09-10.
    10. Alessandro Lizzeri, 1999. "Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 30(2), pages 214-231, Summer.
    11. S. Huang & Y. Yang & K. Anderson, 2001. "A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1515-1532, November.
    12. Michaël Dewally & Louis Ederington, 2006. "Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information as Remedies for Seller-Buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the Online Comic Book Market," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(2), pages 693-730, March.
    13. Klein, Benjamin & Leffler, Keith B, 1981. "The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(4), pages 615-641, August.
    14. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    15. Ann van Ackere & Diane J. Reyniers, 1995. "Trade-ins and Introductory Offers in a Monopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 26(1), pages 58-74, Spring.
    16. Michael Rothschild & Joseph Stiglitz, 1976. "Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(4), pages 629-649.
    17. Ayres, Ian & Siegelman, Peter, 1995. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 304-321, June.
    18. Michael Spence, 1977. "Consumer Misperceptions, Product Failure and Producer Liability," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 44(3), pages 561-572.
    19. Teck-Hua Ho & I. P. L. Png & Sadat Reza, 2018. "Sunk Cost Fallacy in Driving the World’s Costliest Cars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1761-1778, April.
    20. Heese, Hans S. & Cattani, Kyle & Ferrer, Geraldo & Gilland, Wendell & Roth, Aleda V., 2005. "Competitive advantage through take-back of used products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 143-157, July.
    21. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen & Serguei Netessine, 2016. "Service Competition and Product Quality in the U.S. Automobile Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 1860-1877, July.
    22. Carl Shapiro, 1983. "Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(4), pages 659-679.
    23. Jiawei Chen & Susanna Esteban & Matthew Shum, 2013. "When Do Secondary Markets Harm Firms?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(7), pages 2911-2934, December.
    24. Zhu, Xiaoxi & Wang, Miaomiao & Chen, Guofu & Chen, Xiaoshan, 2016. "The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 856-868.
    25. Preyas Desai & Devavrat Purohit, 1998. "Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 19-34, November.
    26. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Shu & Zhu, Stuart X. & Fu, Ke, 2025. "The manufacturer’s resale strategy for trade-ins," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 583-598.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wayne Fu & Atalay Atasu & Necati Tereyağoğlu, 2022. "Warranty Length, Product Reliability, and Secondary Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2240-2255, July.
    2. Hu, Shu & Zhu, Stuart X. & Fu, Ke, 2023. "Optimal trade-in and refurbishment strategies for durable goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 133-151.
    3. Hu, Shu & Zhu, Stuart X. & Fu, Ke, 2025. "The manufacturer’s resale strategy for trade-ins," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 583-598.
    4. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.
    5. Raghunath Singh Rao & Om Narasimhan & George John, 2009. "Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 950-967, 09-10.
    6. Creane, Anthony & Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Sim, Kyoungbo, 2022. "Welfare effects of product certification under latent adverse selection," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Zu-Jun Ma & Qin Zhou & Ying Dai & Gao-Feng Guan, 2018. "To License or Not to License Remanufacturing Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. John G. Riley, 2001. "Silver Signals: Twenty-Five Years of Screening and Signaling," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 432-478, June.
    9. Aditya Vedantam & Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Trade‐In or Sell in My P2P Marketplace: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Profit and Environmental Impact," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 3923-3942, November.
    10. Lacourbe, Paul, 2016. "Durable goods leasing in the presence of exporting used products to an international secondary market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 448-456.
    11. Hu, Shu & Tang, Yanli, 2024. "Impact of product sharing and heterogeneous consumers on manufacturers offering trade-in programs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. W. Bentley MacLeod, 2006. "Reputations, Relationships and the Enforcement of Incomplete Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 1730, CESifo.
    13. Ma, Zu-Jun & Zhou, Qin & Dai, Ying & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2017. "Optimal pricing decisions under the coexistence of “trade old for new” and “trade old for remanufactured” programs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 337-352.
    14. Sungwook Yoon & Sukjae Jeong, 2017. "Investment Strategy in a Closed Loop Supply Chain: The Case of a Market with Competition between Two Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-32, September.
    15. Li, Sanxi & Peitz, Martin & Zhao, Xiaojian, 2010. "Worried about Adverse Product Effects? Information Disclosure and Consumer Awareness," TSE Working Papers 10-157, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Hackl, Franz & Kügler, Agnes & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2011. "Reputation and Certification in Online Shops," Economics Series 279, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    17. Quan, Yuting & Hong, Jiangtao & Song, Jingpu & Leng, Mingming, 2021. "Game-theoretic analysis of trade-in services in closed-loop supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Wang, Xuan & Ng, Chi To & Dong, Ciwei, 2020. "Implications of peer-to-peer product sharing when the selling firm joins the sharing market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 138-151.
    19. Born, Alexander & Kovachka, Nikoleta & Lessmann, Stefan & Seow, Hsin-Vonn, 2018. "Price Management in the Used-Car Market: An Evaluation of Survival Analysis," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-065, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    20. Li, Sijie & Jia, Dongfeng & Zheng, Bin, 2022. "The manufacturer’s trade-in partner choice and pricing in the presence of collection platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:737-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.